Re: release & commiters

[Thomas Draier]

Hi all,

I submit Unomi 1.1.0-incubating release to your vote.

Staging Repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1005/

Git tag:
unomi-root-1.1.0-incubating

Release Notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12335442==12319220

Please vote to approve this release:

[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Regards
thomas


On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:04 PM Chris Laprun  wrote:

> Done as well, only kept documentation one as we probably need to update
> the documentation with all the recent changes.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> > On 20 Sep 2016, at 11:41, Quentin Lamerand  wrote:
> >
> > Done as well.
> > Regards,
> > Q
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Serge Huber  wrote:
> >
> >> Done from my side.
> >>
> >> cheers,
> >>  Serge…
> >>
> >>> On 20 sept. 2016, at 10:29, Thomas Draier  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ok,
> >>>
> >>> If everybody's ok for the release, I'll start the process asap. Can you
> >>> please review all resolved tickets you opened and close them if it's
> ok ?
> >>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
> >> 3D%20UNOMI%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20AND%20reporter%20in%20(
> >> currentUser())
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>>
> >>> thomas
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:29 PM Thomas Draier 
> wrote:
> >>>
>  We could probably go for a 2.0 when we upgrade ES and karaf . And
> yes, a
>  possibility to use a non-embedded ES would be nice, but then we'll
> have
> >> to
>  handle the cluster by ourself (which should not be a big deal).
> 
> 
>  On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:20 PM Serge Huber  wrote:
> 
> > +1 for release
> >
> > +1 for Abdelkader
> >
> > +1 for Damien
> >
> > After the release it would be great if we could merge my pull request
> >> to
> > upgrade to ElasticSearch 2.4.0. I’ve been testing it more and more
> and
> >> it
> > seems functional from my side. We should also upgrade to Karaf 4 once
> >> JB
> > has time to send us his modifications :)
> >
> > After that there are more things I’d like to improve (such as making
> it
> > possible to use a non-embedded ElasticSearch) but I think that’s a
> >> topic
> > for another mail :)
> >
> > cheers,
> > Serge…
> >
> >> On 14 sept. 2016, at 14:53, Thomas Draier 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> What would you think of starting a release 1.1.0 ? There have been a
> > lot of
> >> bug fixes, and some improvements on the API (privacy, user profile,
> > ability
> >> to post conditions, ..), and also a long time since the last
> release.
> >>
> >> And also, I would like to propose Abdelkader Midani and Damien
> >> Gaillard
> > as
> >> committers . Abdelakader already did  a lot of fixes, and Damien
> > started to
> >> contribute just one month ago but already did some interesting
> patches
> > too.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> thomas
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
>
>

Re: release & commiters

[Chris Laprun]

Done as well, only kept documentation one as we probably need to update the 
documentation with all the recent changes.

Cheers,
Chris

> On 20 Sep 2016, at 11:41, Quentin Lamerand  wrote:
> 
> Done as well.
> Regards,
> Q
> 
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Serge Huber  wrote:
> 
>> Done from my side.
>> 
>> cheers,
>>  Serge…
>> 
>>> On 20 sept. 2016, at 10:29, Thomas Draier  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Ok,
>>> 
>>> If everybody's ok for the release, I'll start the process asap. Can you
>>> please review all resolved tickets you opened and close them if it's ok ?
>>> 
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>> 3D%20UNOMI%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20AND%20reporter%20in%20(
>> currentUser())
>>> 
>>> thanks,
>>> 
>>> thomas
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:29 PM Thomas Draier  wrote:
>>> 
 We could probably go for a 2.0 when we upgrade ES and karaf . And yes, a
 possibility to use a non-embedded ES would be nice, but then we'll have
>> to
 handle the cluster by ourself (which should not be a big deal).
 
 
 On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:20 PM Serge Huber  wrote:
 
> +1 for release
> 
> +1 for Abdelkader
> 
> +1 for Damien
> 
> After the release it would be great if we could merge my pull request
>> to
> upgrade to ElasticSearch 2.4.0. I’ve been testing it more and more and
>> it
> seems functional from my side. We should also upgrade to Karaf 4 once
>> JB
> has time to send us his modifications :)
> 
> After that there are more things I’d like to improve (such as making it
> possible to use a non-embedded ElasticSearch) but I think that’s a
>> topic
> for another mail :)
> 
> cheers,
> Serge…
> 
>> On 14 sept. 2016, at 14:53, Thomas Draier  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi there,
>> 
>> What would you think of starting a release 1.1.0 ? There have been a
> lot of
>> bug fixes, and some improvements on the API (privacy, user profile,
> ability
>> to post conditions, ..), and also a long time since the last release.
>> 
>> And also, I would like to propose Abdelkader Midani and Damien
>> Gaillard
> as
>> committers . Abdelakader already did  a lot of fixes, and Damien
> started to
>> contribute just one month ago but already did some interesting patches
> too.
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> thomas
> 
> 
>> 
>> 

Re: release & commiters

[Quentin Lamerand]

Done as well.
Regards,
Q

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Serge Huber  wrote:

> Done from my side.
>
> cheers,
>   Serge…
>
> > On 20 sept. 2016, at 10:29, Thomas Draier  wrote:
> >
> > Ok,
> >
> > If everybody's ok for the release, I'll start the process asap. Can you
> > please review all resolved tickets you opened and close them if it's ok ?
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
> 3D%20UNOMI%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20AND%20reporter%20in%20(
> currentUser())
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > thomas
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:29 PM Thomas Draier  wrote:
> >
> >> We could probably go for a 2.0 when we upgrade ES and karaf . And yes, a
> >> possibility to use a non-embedded ES would be nice, but then we'll have
> to
> >> handle the cluster by ourself (which should not be a big deal).
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:20 PM Serge Huber  wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 for release
> >>>
> >>> +1 for Abdelkader
> >>>
> >>> +1 for Damien
> >>>
> >>> After the release it would be great if we could merge my pull request
> to
> >>> upgrade to ElasticSearch 2.4.0. I’ve been testing it more and more and
> it
> >>> seems functional from my side. We should also upgrade to Karaf 4 once
> JB
> >>> has time to send us his modifications :)
> >>>
> >>> After that there are more things I’d like to improve (such as making it
> >>> possible to use a non-embedded ElasticSearch) but I think that’s a
> topic
> >>> for another mail :)
> >>>
> >>> cheers,
> >>>  Serge…
> >>>
>  On 14 sept. 2016, at 14:53, Thomas Draier  wrote:
> 
>  Hi there,
> 
>  What would you think of starting a release 1.1.0 ? There have been a
> >>> lot of
>  bug fixes, and some improvements on the API (privacy, user profile,
> >>> ability
>  to post conditions, ..), and also a long time since the last release.
> 
>  And also, I would like to propose Abdelkader Midani and Damien
> Gaillard
> >>> as
>  committers . Abdelakader already did  a lot of fixes, and Damien
> >>> started to
>  contribute just one month ago but already did some interesting patches
> >>> too.
> 
>  Regards
> 
>  thomas
> >>>
> >>>
>
>

Re: release & commiters

[Serge Huber]

Done from my side. 

cheers,  
  Serge… 

> On 20 sept. 2016, at 10:29, Thomas Draier  wrote:
> 
> Ok,
> 
> If everybody's ok for the release, I'll start the process asap. Can you
> please review all resolved tickets you opened and close them if it's ok ?
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UNOMI%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20AND%20reporter%20in%20(currentUser())
> 
> thanks,
> 
> thomas
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:29 PM Thomas Draier  wrote:
> 
>> We could probably go for a 2.0 when we upgrade ES and karaf . And yes, a
>> possibility to use a non-embedded ES would be nice, but then we'll have to
>> handle the cluster by ourself (which should not be a big deal).
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:20 PM Serge Huber  wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 for release
>>> 
>>> +1 for Abdelkader
>>> 
>>> +1 for Damien
>>> 
>>> After the release it would be great if we could merge my pull request to
>>> upgrade to ElasticSearch 2.4.0. I’ve been testing it more and more and it
>>> seems functional from my side. We should also upgrade to Karaf 4 once JB
>>> has time to send us his modifications :)
>>> 
>>> After that there are more things I’d like to improve (such as making it
>>> possible to use a non-embedded ElasticSearch) but I think that’s a topic
>>> for another mail :)
>>> 
>>> cheers,
>>>  Serge…
>>> 
 On 14 sept. 2016, at 14:53, Thomas Draier  wrote:
 
 Hi there,
 
 What would you think of starting a release 1.1.0 ? There have been a
>>> lot of
 bug fixes, and some improvements on the API (privacy, user profile,
>>> ability
 to post conditions, ..), and also a long time since the last release.
 
 And also, I would like to propose Abdelkader Midani and Damien Gaillard
>>> as
 committers . Abdelakader already did  a lot of fixes, and Damien
>>> started to
 contribute just one month ago but already did some interesting patches
>>> too.
 
 Regards
 
 thomas
>>> 
>>> 

Re: Unomi 2 roadmap (was Re: release & commiters)

[Chris Laprun]

> On 14 Sep 2016, at 15:30, Serge Huber  wrote:
> 
> I’m hoping we can use Karaf Cellar for direct clustering of Apache Unomi 
> nodes :) 

I would argue that we should use semantic versioning for Unomi and unless, we 
have API-breaking changes, we probably should stick with v1.x for the ES / 
Karaf upgrade. 2.x should probably be reserved for when we finally have a CXS 
spec to implement.


> cheers,
>  Serge… 
> 
>> On 14 sept. 2016, at 15:29, Thomas Draier  wrote:
>> 
>> We could probably go for a 2.0 when we upgrade ES and karaf . And yes, a
>> possibility to use a non-embedded ES would be nice, but then we'll have to
>> handle the cluster by ourself (which should not be a big deal).
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:20 PM Serge Huber  wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 for release
>>> 
>>> +1 for Abdelkader
>>> 
>>> +1 for Damien
>>> 
>>> After the release it would be great if we could merge my pull request to
>>> upgrade to ElasticSearch 2.4.0. I’ve been testing it more and more and it
>>> seems functional from my side. We should also upgrade to Karaf 4 once JB
>>> has time to send us his modifications :)
>>> 
>>> After that there are more things I’d like to improve (such as making it
>>> possible to use a non-embedded ElasticSearch) but I think that’s a topic
>>> for another mail :)
>>> 
>>> cheers,
>>> Serge…
>>> 
 On 14 sept. 2016, at 14:53, Thomas Draier  wrote:
 
 Hi there,
 
 What would you think of starting a release 1.1.0 ? There have been a lot
>>> of
 bug fixes, and some improvements on the API (privacy, user profile,
>>> ability
 to post conditions, ..), and also a long time since the last release.
 
 And also, I would like to propose Abdelkader Midani and Damien Gaillard
>>> as
 committers . Abdelakader already did  a lot of fixes, and Damien started
>>> to
 contribute just one month ago but already did some interesting patches
>>> too.
 
 Regards
 
 thomas
>>> 
>>> 
>