Re: Board report for Wednesday morning

2006-11-11 Thread Nathan Bubna
Sure. let's see... Velocity Tools is working through a short backlog of patch contributions and bugs hoping to get a 1.3 version released before Velocity 1.5 goes final. It's also the plan to test VelocityStruts 1.3 against Struts 1.3 for compatibility. VelocityTools 1.3 is likely to be the

Re: is Texen orphaned?

2006-11-25 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 11/25/06, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Apparently, the main example in the Texen docs in Velocity 1.4 is broken. Geir broke it in early 2002, and Shinobu found and fixed the problem in early 2005. So while this has been fixed for 1.5, for the past couple of years the docs

Re: svn commit: r480868 -

2006-11-30 Thread Nathan Bubna
In 1.3, i've been on something of a push to simplify the syntax and readability of how tools are used in templates. The idea is to make an elegant, simple VTL interface for these tools, even if it looks odd from a java perspective. Given the choice between: $context.context and

Re: svn commit: r480849 -

2006-11-30 Thread Nathan Bubna
technically, it would be an empty map not empty list, but even so, i'm not sure about this. if we can say for sure that no one (especially us) will ever want to tell the difference between an empty toolbox and no toolbox being set, then it would be marginally simpler to ensure that toolbox is

Veltools 1.3 - Showcase Example

2006-12-08 Thread Nathan Bubna
hey folks, you probably noticed that i just checked in a new example app for VelocityTools to replace the layout example. this is something i've been thinking of doing for years, and finally got around to doing. basically, it provides demonstrations (most of which are interactive) of all the

Re: Veltools 1.3 - Showcase Example

2006-12-11 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 12/11/06, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le lundi 11 décembre 2006 à 09:45 -0800, Nathan Bubna a écrit : On 12/9/06, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks very cool. That's a lot of work! Some remarks: - Alternator: we'd like the hand-made examples to return

Re: Veltools 1.3 - Showcase Example

2006-12-11 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 12/10/06, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: p.s. VelocityView and the Generic Tools are largely ready for a 1.3 release. if anyone wants to help me get 1.3 out the door, i'd love some help updating the VelocityStruts dependencies

Re: Veltools 1.3 - Showcase Example

2006-12-11 Thread Nathan Bubna
of an application, where it is more natural to present the human month value rather than the machine one. On 12/11/06, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le lundi 11 décembre 2006 à 12:47 -0800, Nathan Bubna a écrit : so basically, there's plenty of capability in DateTool, but only limited

Re: Veltools 1.3 - Showcase Example

2006-12-12 Thread Nathan Bubna
Ok. Make sure you move it to the Struts 1.x head, and not Struts 2.x. They are entirely different frameworks. On 12/11/06, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: velocity-tools builds again (see http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/velocity

Re: Velocity Site - Preview

2006-12-12 Thread Nathan Bubna
I like the direction this is heading, especially as laid out here: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-velocity/VelocitySite I'll help with the Tools docs at least. But it might be a week or so. I've gotta get some other work done first. On 12/11/06, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Velocity ImportTool Question

2006-12-14 Thread Nathan Bubna
, Nathan Bubna a écrit : On 12/14/06, Tod Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan Bubna wrote: and what does your web.xml have? Sorry, plain vanilla: !-- Define Velocity template compiler -- servlet servlet-namevelocity/servlet-name servlet-class

Re: Velocity Site - Preview

2006-12-18 Thread Nathan Bubna
First, general thoughts I would like to see our web site reflect our charter in the sense that the Velocity Engine is always prominent and pre-eminent. It is a requirement that the other subprojects be dependent on that core center pole, otherwise the umbrella will become a mere sack. I'm

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.3-beta1

2006-12-18 Thread Nathan Bubna
best to do that now... Claude Le lundi 18 décembre 2006 à 12:06 -0800, Nathan Bubna a écrit : Ok, i've got all the dependencies upgraded. The ant build system seems to be working great. I've attempted to get the Gump build working again, but that shouldn't hold up a release anyway. So

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.3-beta1

2006-12-21 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 12/21/06, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ok, i've got all the dependencies upgraded. The ant build system seems to be working great. I've attempted to get the Gump build working again, but that shouldn't hold up a release anyway

Re: docs / javadocs in the tools svn?

2006-12-22 Thread Nathan Bubna
The reasons for this are primarily historical at this point. I believe the original motivation was to make it easy to update the public site by just doing svn update. At this point, i guess i'm +0.1 on removing the generated documentation from version control in this version. Once we have

Re: [jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-502) Skip jar verification unless force.jar.loading is true

2006-12-23 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 12/23/06, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le samedi 23 décembre 2006 à 15:45 -0800, Nathan Bubna (JIRA) a écrit : I don't really care. Both have advantages, both will work fine. If you're going to do the work, i say you should get to decide. :) That's the new commiter syndrom

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.3-beta1

2007-01-03 Thread Nathan Bubna
: Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (First: Happy new year, Velocity folks!) Hi Nathan, I somehow missed that you have put the 1.3 beta-1 release archives onto www.apache.org/dist. As this is a beta version and not a release, the location is a bit unfortunate. I'd very much prefer if you could

Re: #evaluate

2007-01-03 Thread Nathan Bubna
The more canonical example for an evaluate tool (or directive) is being ably to dynamically decide what method to call on a particular reference. So, something along the lines of: #if( $this $that ) #set( $method = $foo ) #else #set( $method = $bar ) #end $render.eval( \${someRef}.${method}

Re: JIRA issues - resolve or close

2007-01-11 Thread Nathan Bubna
I can see some value in this process, but not enough that i really care either way for myself. I'll do whatever pleases. :) On 1/11/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I just reopened and resolved some issues. Reason for this is: I'd like to follow the proposed status

Re: Tiles mailing list Was: Re: [jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-64) Geronimo 1.1.1 with Tomcat install fails to render links correctly

2007-01-16 Thread Nathan Bubna
there :-) Claude Le mardi 16 janvier 2007 à 13:37 -0800, Nathan Bubna a écrit : That's an odd question. Not sure what far means when we're talking about mailing lists, but i am subscribed to all the newly created Tiles TLP mailing lists. On 1/16/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just

[veltools] 1.3 freeze soon...

2007-01-18 Thread Nathan Bubna
Just giving fair warning to anyone planning/hoping to make any further changes to VelocityTools before 1.3 is released... My current plan is to call for a vote to release 1.3-rc1 on Monday. At that time, it would be rather unhelpful for further changes to be made, since that would require a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project velocity-tools (in module velocity-tools) failed

2007-01-19 Thread Nathan Bubna
VelocityTools is getting a Gump failure because we recently upgraded our Validator tool to use the org.struts.validator.Resources.getVarValue(Var,ServletContext,HttpServletRequest,boolean) method (to mirror the same change in JavascriptValidatorTag). The problem appears to be that the

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.3-beta1

2007-01-25 Thread Nathan Bubna
The vote has passed! I'll tag the release today and try to upload it tonight or tomorrow. Announcement should follow once the release is mirrored. PMC +1 Nathan Bubna Will Glass-Husain Henning Schmiedehausen Committer +1 Claude Brisson User/Contributor +1 Malcolm Edgar On 12/18/06, Nathan

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.3-beta1

2007-01-25 Thread Nathan Bubna
Sorry, wrong thread. let's try that again... On 1/25/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The vote has passed! I'll tag the release today and try to upload it tonight or tomorrow. Announcement should follow once the release is mirrored. PMC +1 Nathan Bubna Will Glass-Husain Henning

Re: Release dist directory structure

2007-01-27 Thread Nathan Bubna
just need to use Maven 2.0.5-SNAPSHOT, would you point me to a build? i'd rather not have to build it myself this weekend. On 1/27/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :) Great! Well, since our chair was so enthusiastic and he and i have been doing the recent releases, i'm going to go

Re: [VOTE]: Release Velocity 1.5

2007-01-27 Thread Nathan Bubna
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Been waiting for this day for a while now :) +1 On 1/25/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 On 1/24/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's do it. The list of changes (http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? version

Re: Release dist directory structure

2007-01-27 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 1/27/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Henning, i've updated all the relevant stuff in velocity/site that i can think of, but i have not been able to successfully build it locally, much less deploy it. Would you mind deploying

Re: Release dist directory structure

2007-01-27 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 1/27/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/27/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Henning, i've updated all the relevant stuff in velocity/site that i can think of, but i have not been able to successfully build

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity 1.5 (again, this time for real. :-) )

2007-01-29 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 On 1/28/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Due to a misunderstanding in the vote procedure, we actually have to repeat the release vote, because we should vote only on really rolled releases. The candidate for the Apache Velocity 1.5 release is available from

[ANNOUNCE] VelocityTools 1.3 Release Candidate 1

2007-01-29 Thread Nathan Bubna
The Apache Velocity project is pleased to announce the first release candidate for VelocityTools 1.3. You may download this release from: http://velocity.apache.org/download.cgi Significant changes since VelocityTools 1.2 are: - New tools: ContextTool for accessing context data, ResourceTool

Re: svn commit: r500648 - /velocity/engine/branches/Velocity_1.5_BRANCH/

2007-01-29 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 1/29/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, all other branches are also named VEL_something_BRANCH (yes, I know that comes semi-automatically from CVS). I wanted to keep in tune. I actually didn't think much about it. I believe

Re: Automatic Site rebuild

2007-01-29 Thread Nathan Bubna
I'd rather not leave something running that is out of our control for a month unless there is very clear need for it, which i don't see at this point. As long as Will's concerns are addressed in the announcement emails and news blurb on the web site, we should be fine until you get back.

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity 1.5 (again, this time for real. :-) )

2007-01-30 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 1/30/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Reluctantly, I vote -1. :( I tested the release. It compiled fine, ant test ran fine under JDK 1.5 and 1.6, worked with Velocity Tools 1.2. But when I checked all the hyperlinks, the anakia page was missing. There's an error

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity 1.5 (again, this time for real. :-) )

2007-01-30 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 1/30/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... I did discuss this in some depth with Will on IRC. He explained me his reasons for the vote in depth I respect them. Here is my response: - The problem with the anakia.html file is apparent and obvious. So we have a single file

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity 1.5 (again, this time for real. :-) )

2007-01-30 Thread Nathan Bubna
could call this Velocity 1.5rc1. But given the historic significance of this release, I urge us to release Velocity 1.5 in a professional distro without obvious errors.(no need to immediately issue Velocity 1.5.1). best, WILL On 1/30/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/30/07

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity 1.5 (again, this time for real. :-) )

2007-01-30 Thread Nathan Bubna
to immediately issue Velocity 1.5.1). best, WILL On 1/30/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/30/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Reluctantly, I vote -1. :( I tested the release. It compiled fine, ant test ran fine under JDK 1.5 and 1.6, worked

Release/Voting processes

2007-01-30 Thread Nathan Bubna
ok, there seems to be some confusion about the different ways to prepare, label, and vote on releases. here's my understanding of the two most common options. 1) How we used to do it. We would put the quality/status of the release in the release name. These would typically go something

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity 1.5 (again, this time for real. :-) )

2007-01-31 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 1/31/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 31, 2007, at 5:54 AM, Nathan Bubna wrote: On 1/30/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Why is he the only one that can do the site? because Maven2 has issues and that's what the current site is being built

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity 1.5 (again, this time for real. :-) )

2007-01-31 Thread Nathan Bubna
. Claude has agreed to be the European contact for the press and I'll be listed as the US contact. that's great! perhaps we could put out a request for commercial soundbites on the user list? WILL On 1/31/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you're willing to do the release, go

[VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.3 Final

2007-02-05 Thread Nathan Bubna
No problems new problems have been reported since the release of 1.3-rc1, and i've made another, more thorough pass through the docs and build scripts, so i think we are ready to release 1.3 final. Changes since VelocityTools 1.3-rc1 are as follow: - Improved publish target in build.xml - Added

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.3 Final

2007-02-08 Thread Nathan Bubna
The vote has passed! +1's from Nathan Bubna Claude Brisson Will Glass-Husain Daniel Rall I'll move the release to the dist folders for mirroring and work on getting the site updated so we can announce this release broadly. On 2/5/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No problems new

Re: update on site issues

2007-02-08 Thread Nathan Bubna
thanks! On 2/8/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I fixed the group. You should be good to go. If not, bellow again... geir On Feb 8, 2007, at 5:50 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote: I've made some progress with building the site. I've managed to get maven (2.0.6-snapshot) to build

Re: update on site issues

2007-02-09 Thread Nathan Bubna
logging in with SSH keys. WILL On 2/9/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't get too excited yet. So, i gave up on trying to get the site plugin to generate the index.html page with the news macro. Instead, i commented out the news macro and manually added the latest news. So now i

Re: [ANN] tuc 1.0a1 - URLConnection unit testing framework built for VELTOOLS

2007-02-13 Thread Nathan Bubna
nice! i'll try to take a look at it this week. On 2/12/07, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All, In writing unit tests for velocity tools, I needed a component like this and it didn't already seem to exist. So, I created a formal

Re: update on site issues

2007-02-13 Thread Nathan Bubna
permissions right on the public key and containing folder? That always trips me up when logging in with SSH keys. WILL On 2/9/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't get too excited yet. So, i gave up on trying to get the site plugin to generate the index.html page with the news macro

[ANNOUNCE] VelocityTools 1.3 released

2007-02-14 Thread Nathan Bubna
://velocity.apache.org/tools/devel/changes.html VelocityTools 1.3 is available in either source or binary form at: http://velocity.apache.org/download.cgi#tools For more information about VelocityTools go to: http://velocity.apache.org/tools/devel/index.html Nathan Bubna, on behalf of the Velocity

Re: svn commit: r509094 - in /velocity/engine/trunk/src: java/org/apache/velocity/util/introspection/SecureIntrospectorImpl.java test/org/apache/velocity/test/SecureIntrospectionTestCase.java

2007-02-19 Thread Nathan Bubna
Awful lot of formatting changes mixed in here, makes it hard to tell what changed. :( On 2/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: wglass Date: Sun Feb 18 21:17:09 2007 New Revision: 509094 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=509094 Log: Allow SecureUberspector to

Re: update on site issues

2007-02-19 Thread Nathan Bubna
weeks lately due to work deadlines. When that hits 8, I'll have a little free time to address this :-) Give me till this weekend to do the right thing here... WILL On 2/13/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: finally got it working. the updated site has been uploaded and should

[VOTE] Release Velocity Engine 1.5

2007-02-22 Thread Nathan Bubna
Ok, Will has fixed the doc issues that made him -1 the last test build, as well as a minor bug in the new SecureUberspect. All the tests pass, the build looks solid to me, and the included velocity-1.5.jar works just dandy with the VelocityTools example apps. The test build for this release is

Re: [Tools] Some proposals for Tools 2.0

2007-02-26 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 2/25/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there! Here are some structural evolutions I'd like to discuss before any coding. I'm pretty sure that the first one is a good option - the second one is more prospective. 1. On-demand tools loading: instead of a standard HashMap, the idea

Re: update on site issues

2007-03-05 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 3/5/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Anyone out there got that karma? Geir? Or does anyone know who i should talk to? I'm guessing the infrastructure people, but i thought i'd ask here first. Hm. Are you not in Jakarta? You

Re: Velocity 1.5 Release - SVN Revision?

2007-03-06 Thread Nathan Bubna
I've got to rush out the door to a meeting, but i'll be back in an hour or so. Then i'll comment further, tally the votes and get things moving. And yes, i'm all for a 1.5.1. no shame in that. On 3/6/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

Re: Velocity 1.5 Release - SVN Revision?

2007-03-06 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 3/6/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My vote is reluctantly +1, because the I want to get it out weights more for me than the issues that I have found: BTW: Strictly spoken are the references in the POM wrong because they should

Re: Releasing it (was: Re: Velocity 1.5 Release - SVN Revision?)

2007-03-06 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 3/6/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 10:09 -0800, Nathan Bubna wrote: If you'd prefer, i'd be happy to cede the update of the web site to you or at least enlist your help. I've got things working adequately, but not splendidly. Things left

Re: Releasing it (was: Re: Velocity 1.5 Release - SVN Revision?)

2007-03-06 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 3/6/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/6/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 10:09 -0800, Nathan Bubna wrote: If you'd prefer, i'd be happy to cede the update of the web site to you or at least enlist your help. I've got things working

Re: Releasing it (was: Re: Velocity 1.5 Release - SVN Revision?)

2007-03-06 Thread Nathan Bubna
this tonight. WILL On 3/6/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/6/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/6/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 10:09 -0800, Nathan Bubna wrote: If you'd prefer, i'd be happy to cede the update of the web

Re: Releasing it (was: Re: Velocity 1.5 Release - SVN Revision?)

2007-03-07 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 3/7/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i noticed that there weren't many there, but i couldn't remember if there were a lot beforehand. (i.e. i didn't know if my update introduced that or not). I've deployed both sites again

Re: svn commit: r517553 [1/2] - in

2007-03-13 Thread Nathan Bubna
I agree that this is not part of the public API, and i'm ok with the change. However, we need to make sure this is very well-documented, so that those who do more heavy hacking on Velocity get warning of the change. And, if it's easy/trivial to add a deprecation path, that wouldn't hurt

Re: Google Summer of Code project idea request

2007-03-22 Thread Nathan Bubna
There are some grammatical/spelling issues*, but on the whole it looks good to me. *On spelling, change cashing to caching. If you want grammar corrections let me know, and i can go through it again and send you a list later today. On 3/21/07, Supun Kamburugamuva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,

Re: [Tools] Some proposals for Tools 2.0

2007-03-22 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 2/26/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/25/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there! Here are some structural evolutions I'd like to discuss before any coding. I'm pretty sure that the first one is a good option - the second one is more prospective. 1. On-demand

Re: [Tools] Some proposals for Tools 2.0

2007-03-22 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 3/22/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le jeudi 22 mars 2007 à 09:26 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit : snip/ Oh, responding to one of your previous points: i don't see why we need a filter or to constitute the three toolboxes at all. It's a need I frequently encountered. Quite

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity DocBook Framework 1.0

2007-03-23 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 On 3/21/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Let's say, it will not get better and I'm already bored out of my mind again tinkering with XSL and XML.] This is the CfV for the first release of the Velocity DocBook Framework. It is intended for creating and maintaining high

Re: Google Summer of Code project idea request

2007-03-23 Thread Nathan Bubna
, Thanks for the effort. I have corrected most of the spelling issues and grammatical issues. If you have time please go thought it. Thanks, Supun.. On 3/22/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are some grammatical/spelling issues*, but on the whole it looks good to me. *On spelling

Re: [Tools] Some proposals for Tools 2.0

2007-03-23 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 3/23/07, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nathan, Nathan Bubna wrote: The VelocityView class can be easily used in a filter as it is, and once we have the toolboxes in the request/session/application attributes, then we can access

Re: Google Summer of Code project idea request

2007-03-24 Thread Nathan Bubna
this all the time (generating a syntax error). $Tool.someMethod($velocityCount - 1) or similar. WILL On 3/24/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/24/07, Supun Kamburugamuva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Thanks for the feedback. I'll add those additions and corrections. I think

Re: whither 1.6?

2007-03-26 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 3/25/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Colleagues, What should we aim for with Velocity 1.6? I feel that we've cleaned up most urgent bugs and pressing issues with the 1.5 release. Given the sporadic nature of our development efforts, timelines are a little risky. Still, I

Re: whither 1.6?

2007-03-26 Thread Nathan Bubna
new features. For completeness, I'd like to see us do a release of DVSL as well. I'll help with all this. The treat arrays like lists, support iterables, support vararg also seem good improvements on usability. Are all these items in JIRA? they are now. WILL On 3/26/07, Nathan Bubna

Re: svn commit: r523108 - /velocity/engine/trunk/src/java/org/apache/velocity/runtime/parser/node/ASTIntegerRange.java

2007-03-28 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 3/27/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does this mean a decimal number is supported in an integer range? yeah, it just takes the intValue(). i was a little surprised at this at first, until i realized it basically makes it so that template authors needn't care about the

moving LogChutes from Tools to Engine

2007-04-02 Thread Nathan Bubna
Hey folks, So, the only reason CommonsLogLogSystem ever went into VelocityTools was that that was the path of least resistance for me at the time. I wanted it to be released soon, and Velocity releases didn't happen soon. Now that we are up to speed, more or less, the reality is that

Re: any comments pre-vote?

2007-04-04 Thread Nathan Bubna
Just looked through Texen, and it appears to be using the Engine versions of its own classes internally. (e.g. org.apache.velocity.texen.Generator instead of org.apache.texen.Generator) I briefly tried to fix that, but was getting Ant build errors as a result. Not sure yet what the deal

Re: any comments pre-vote?

2007-04-04 Thread Nathan Bubna
Fixed a few in the Anakia docs too. Everything looks fine and works fine for me. I think we should go ahead with the 1.0 votes. On 4/4/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ah. there were org.apache.velocity.texen packages in some of the props for testcases. all is fixed and checked

Re: svn commit: r525698 - in /velocity/engine/trunk/src:

2007-04-09 Thread Nathan Bubna
size(), isEmpty(), get(int), and set(int,Object) are + * supported. Later, support may be added for other read-only methods + * such as contains(Object) or subList(int,int). Patches are welcome! :) + * + * @author Nathan Bubna + * @version $Id: VelArrayMethod.java 440740 2006-09-06 15:37:44Z

Re: svn commit: r524893 - in /velocity/engine/trunk: build/build.properties

2007-04-09 Thread Nathan Bubna
See r524894 On 4/8/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Author: nbubna Date: Mon Apr 2 12:27:29 2007 New Revision: 524893 [...] # Needs to be configured with system location of javacc for parser task -javacc.home= *unset* +javacc.home=

Re: svn commit: r525698 - in /velocity/engine/trunk/src:

2007-04-10 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 4/10/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 4/8/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: While I hope to grasp the intention of this patch; why can't you wrap the Array into Arrays.asList

Re: welcome!

2007-04-13 Thread Nathan Bubna
Congrats on getting your application accepted! On 4/13/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Supun, Welcome to the Velocity community! You've probably already heard that your application for Google Summer of Code 2007 has been accepted. As your official mentor I'm sending you a

Re: Changing Header.vm file on Locale change

2007-04-17 Thread Nathan Bubna
Please don't cross-post. This is a user list question. Wait a few days to get a reply there before you try this list. On 4/16/07, santas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi What i want to do is that whenever i change Locale of my application depending on that locale i want to change my

Re: Changing Header.vm file on Locale change

2007-04-17 Thread Nathan Bubna
This looks like it might be a good situation to use the MultiViewsTool to find the appropriate header.vm file: http://velocity.apache.org/tools/devel/javadoc/org/apache/velocity/tools/view/i18n/MultiViewsTool.html I haven't used it myself, but my understanding is that you use it to find the

Re: Changing Header.vm file on Locale change

2007-04-19 Thread Nathan Bubna
, rather than asking on the Velocity list. Thanks Nathan Bubna wrote: This looks like it might be a good situation to use the MultiViewsTool to find the appropriate header.vm file: http://velocity.apache.org/tools/devel/javadoc/org/apache/velocity/tools/view/i18n/MultiViewsTool.html I

Re: svn commit: r525698 - in /velocity/engine/trunk/src:

2007-04-23 Thread Nathan Bubna
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-533 On 4/23/07, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Henning, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd be happy to attach this code to a Jira isssue

Re: svn commit: r532551 [1/2] - /velocity/docs/src/docbook/userguide/VelocityUsersGuide.xml

2007-04-25 Thread Nathan Bubna
Ah, it was in the next email. weird. On 4/25/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why is there no diff for this? On 4/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: henning Date: Wed Apr 25 17:16:22 2007 New Revision: 532551 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev

Re: Need a clarifcation about some issues

2007-04-27 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 4/27/07, Supun Kamburugamuva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have been playing with Velocity in the past few days. By doing so I encountered couple of problems. I'm not sure weather these are the documented behavior so I thought I should ask the list. 1.I couldn't set a property after I

[veltools] status of 2.x branch

2007-04-27 Thread Nathan Bubna
hey folks, so, i thought i'd give a heads up that VelocityTools 2.x has come along quickly. at this point, the new code can be used to build apps with much less configuration and much greater flexibility and power than the previous version. it is also almost completely backwards compatible.

Re: Need a clarifcation about some issues

2007-04-29 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 4/28/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Supun Kamburugamuva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2.I couldn't call inner class methods. I put an inner class object in to Velocity context and then tried to call its methods from the template. But it didn't work. Velocity just outputs

Re: Need a clarifcation about some issues

2007-04-29 Thread Nathan Bubna
should not be accessible within a template. No need to open an issue for this. Thanks, Supun. On 4/29/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/28/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Supun Kamburugamuva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2.I couldn't call inner class methods

Re: Remove Author tags?

2007-05-03 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 5/3/07, Ahmed Mohombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Basically removing all the @author tags from the velocity code base and docs and replacing it with 'Velocity development community' and a link to the dev-list. How about doing this? -1 from me as a user. In a lot of projects when I had

Re: [VELTOOLS] StrutsLinkTag.setForward

2007-05-08 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 5/8/07, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nathan, Nathan Bubna wrote: I'm not sure. Have you tried it? Of course! ;) just didn't want to assume... :) It doesn't work :( StrutsLinkTool.setForward() basically just hands things

Re: [VELTOOLS] StrutsLinkTag.setForward

2007-05-08 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 5/8/07, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All, Okay, so I needed to change my code just a hair to make it work, but it does work. I'm going to file a JIRA issue and attach a patch. We can discuss any implications of applying said

Re: DVSL logo

2007-05-14 Thread Nathan Bubna
looks nice! On 5/14/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To my knowledge, DVSL hasn't any logo yet. I tweaked under Inkskape a little ambigram (à la Douglas Hofstadter): http://people.apache.org/~cbrisson/dvsl.png Tell me what you think about it. Plus, if anyone wants to modify it,

Re: [veltools] status of 2.x branch

2007-05-16 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 5/16/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le mercredi 16 mai 2007 à 15:41 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit : i don't know if anyone else has taken the time to try out Tools 2.x or cares about it yet, but i thought i'd give an update anyway... For now I just followed your updates. I'll

Re: [veltools] status of 2.x branch

2007-05-16 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 5/16/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le mercredi 16 mai 2007 à 17:24 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit : I just tried a drop-in replacement, just to see what would happen. It failed in my case due to the fact that the ViewTool interface disappeared - after all the efforts you made

Re: [veltools] status of 2.x branch

2007-05-16 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 5/16/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le mercredi 16 mai 2007 à 19:50 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit : On the next test I made, I ran into the first real problem, I think: the init(Object) method seems to not be called at all on an old request tool. If you've got an idea about

Re: [veltools] status of 2.x branch

2007-05-16 Thread Nathan Bubna
ways to do that or make it optional, but it's looking like quite the challenge at the moment. On 5/16/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/16/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le mercredi 16 mai 2007 à 19:50 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit : On the next test I made, I ran

Re: [VELTOOLS2] access to some VelocityView methods

2007-05-28 Thread Nathan Bubna
Sure, go for it! On 5/28/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I propose to relax the access to the three following methods in VelocityView.java : -protected Template getTemplate(HttpServletRequest request) +public Template getTemplate(HttpServletRequest request) -protected

Re: macros - max recursion depth

2007-06-01 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 6/1/07, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nathan, Nathan Bubna wrote: 2. Throw another exception (MacroDepthExceededException?) The way I see it, neither of these options is any better than simply allowing the stack overflow

Re: [anakia] discussion of recent refactoring

2007-06-01 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 6/1/07, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/1/07, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi--you will find me to be a complete novice to Velocity and Anakia; nevertheless I have come to spoil the fun. ;) Actually I feel like my timing

Re: [anakia] discussion of recent refactoring

2007-06-04 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 6/3/07, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ The last thing that might be handy to know is that you can also feed an already instantiated ResourceLoader into the system (rather than have it be loaded and instantiated by class name

Re: Problem with multi-line comments in 1.5..

2007-06-05 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 6/5/07, Erlend Simonsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm in the process of upgading our install of Velocity 1.3.1 to 1.5, but I'm running into a problem with multi-line comments. Basically, in a few cases, I'm getting the *# end marker of a multi-line comment printed into my HTML output. This

Re: echo messages from Sergio Reais

2007-06-08 Thread Nathan Bubna
Me too. And it's worse than that. A couple of Sergio's emails have been empty replys to his own replys to a commit message. Who's the moderator for our lists anyway? Can we shut these down? On 6/8/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/8/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: how to use I18N in macros

2007-06-25 Thread Nathan Bubna
This is a question for the Struts2 user list. They are the ones who created and maintain the #ssubmit directive. You may get an answer here, but it is not likely. I'm not aware of any Struts2 users or developers who are active on this list. On 6/25/07, sudhitekkala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: web site question: tag vs branch.

2007-06-27 Thread Nathan Bubna
we need to find some way to get a Wendy Smoak-type person interested in helping out around here. she has far more expertise and patience for build and doc issues than i could ever dream of having... :) anyway, here's my thoughts: - whoever's ready and willing to jump in and do work on the

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >