On 5/16/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mercredi 16 mai 2007 à 15:41 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
i don't know if anyone else has taken the time to try out Tools 2.x or
cares about it yet, but i thought i'd give an update anyway...
For now I just followed your updates. I'll
On 5/16/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mercredi 16 mai 2007 à 17:24 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
I just tried a drop-in replacement, just to see what would happen. It
failed in my case due to the fact that the ViewTool interface
disappeared - after all the efforts you made
Le mercredi 16 mai 2007 à 19:50 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
On the next test I made, I ran into the first real problem, I think: the
init(Object) method seems to not be called at all on an old request
tool. If you've got an idea about this symptome, well tant
mieux (don't know the
On 5/16/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mercredi 16 mai 2007 à 19:50 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
On the next test I made, I ran into the first real problem, I think: the
init(Object) method seems to not be called at all on an old request
tool. If you've got an idea about
Ok, the problem with init() not being called is fixed.
also, i changed VelocityView to not load the default tool configs when
an old toolbox.xml is in use. this means that people using the old
toolbox.xml can drop in the full jar (including VelocityStruts) and
not have configuration exceptions
hey folks,
so, i thought i'd give a heads up that VelocityTools 2.x has come
along quickly. at this point, the new code can be used to build apps
with much less configuration and much greater flexibility and power
than the previous version. it is also almost completely backwards
compatible.
