Re: Macro arguments

2016-09-24 Thread Will Glass-Husain
That's great! That sounds like the best approach. Configuration on such a specific matter is icky. Just makes it all more confusing. Better to pick the best convention and run with it. WILL On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Claude Brisson wrote: > The sharing convention is already in place s

Re: Macro arguments

2016-09-21 Thread Claude Brisson
The sharing convention is already in place since I applied Jarkko's patch from VELOCITY-841 (which I applied in commit 1753788). You're right, I think we don't need to go further. So I guess we're ready for the release! Claude On 13/09/2016 23:40, Nathan Bubna wrote: Since you're solicit

Re: Macro arguments

2016-09-13 Thread Nathan Bubna
Since you're soliciting opinions, i have to say that we should probably just fully adopt Java's call-by-sharing semantics and not bother with a configurable argument evaluation strategy for macros. I suspect that a shift to call-by-sharing would not break the 90% of macros out there. I don't have e