Re: general@velocity mailing list

2015-06-09 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Well, it's been 10 days, so I'll assume lazy consensus for the rest of the velocity team. Our first step is to remove the mailing list information from our web site. This is a good excuse to figure out how the web site is generated and published, so I'll take a look at this one, as I understand

Re: general@velocity mailing list

2015-06-09 Thread Nathan Bubna
Sounds great, thanks! On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote: Well, it's been 10 days, so I'll assume lazy consensus for the rest of the velocity team. Our first step is to remove the mailing list information from our web site. This is a good excuse to

Re: general@velocity mailing list

2015-05-30 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Frederick N. Brier fnbr...@gmail.com wrote: Sounds good to me :). On 05/30/2015 04:11 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: And while we're at it, why have a general@apache mailing list? Something inherited from Jakarta? It's not archived or publicly visible

Re: general@velocity mailing list

2015-05-30 Thread Frederick N. Brier
Sounds good to me :). On 05/30/2015 04:11 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: And while we're at it, why have a general@apache mailing list? Something inherited from Jakarta? It's not archived or publicly visible on nabble or mail-archive.com. Users have a difficult enough time determining whether