I've also tested last snapshot with my main app and everything seems ok. On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 7:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm happy with all latest changes (being continuously tested using our main > app) > I can address all Martin comments regarding #262-#264 and merge them > > Would it be OK? > Can we start release process after this merging? > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 5:12 AM, Tobias Soloschenko < > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Yes it is a very short description. > > > > So what I meant is that the client side uses the dynamic proxy which > > executes a rest action against the server and hand over class / > parameters > > to the endpoint. The repsonse is automatically transfered into the > business > > object with JSON. The server however accept the rest call and delegate > > everything to a given service by class / parameters. The response is sent > > to the client. RESTRPC. :-) > > > > And I mixed up CRUD with feign client: > > > > https://projects.spring.io/spring-cloud/spring-cloud. > > html#spring-cloud-feign > > > > kind regards > > > > Tobias > > > > > Am 06.02.2018 um 21:50 schrieb Martin Grigorov < > > martin.grigo...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > On Feb 6, 2018 21:45, "Tobias Soloschenko" < > > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I also like REST in combination with type safe interfaces. > > > > > > So what to do: > > > > > > 1. Put the type safe interfaces and transfer objects into a shared > > project > > > > > > 2. Build a rest call within a dynamic proxy (https://docs.oracle.com/ > > > javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/reflection/proxy.html) with all > required > > > handlings at one place - JSON can be used as serializer / deserializer > to > > > the transfer objects > > > > > > 3. Invoke and have fun ;-) > > > > > > I think that is basically all what the spring framework CRUD > > > implementations are (of course with a bit more spring magic) > > > > > > > > > Which Spring CRUD implementations do you mean? > > > > > > Your explanation above is closer to RPC than to REST. > > > But the explanation is too short so I might have misunderstood you. > > > > > > > > > kind regards > > > > > > Tobias > > > > > >> Am 05.02.2018 um 11:39 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com > >: > > >> > > >> Another interesting source for official statements/answers is the > > article > > > I > > >> linked at the bottom of this message. It contains some good (and > funny) > > >> critics to REST and what it promises to deliver. > > >> > > >> https://medium.freecodecamp.org/rest-is-the-new-soap-97ff6c09896d > > >> > > >> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Korbinian Bachl < > > >> korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hello Kamil, > > >>> > > >>> be careful when using this feature in production as there is a race > > >>> condition meaning it depends on network, browser and client thread > > count > > > if > > >>> it works or not. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > > >>>> Von: "Kamil Paśko" <kamil.pa...@solsoft.pl> > > >>>> An: dev@wicket.apache.org > > >>>> Gesendet: Samstag, 3. Februar 2018 21:31:43 > > >>>> Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers > > >>> > > >>>> +1 > > >>>> > > >>>> I could test this "deferred javascript" issue on real application > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> I'm for a new release too. We have a lot of fixes to release also > for > > >>> 7.x > > >>>>> branch. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Feb 3, 2018 11:50 AM, "Martin Grigorov" < > > martin.grigo...@gmail.com> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> On Feb 3, 2018 09:03, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Thanks a lot Andrea! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Not sure if I can do more for the site update :( > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> @Martijn maybe you can provide text for the upcoming release? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> @All, I'm not real fan of it, but maybe it worth to release > another > > >>> "M"? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I think it would be better to release another M or RC because > there > > >>> were > > >>>>>> some bigger changes lately. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> WBR, Maxim > > >>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018, 16:25 Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I've updated copyright year. You don't see 2018 post because it > > has a > > >>>>>>> future date, but you can use flag future:true to show it. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:23 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < > > >>> solomax...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Hello All, > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I have question regarding site generation. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I have added following file: 2018/_posts/2018-02-12-wicket- > > >>>>>>>> 8.0.0-released.md > > >>>>>>>> But news for 2018 are not being generated > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Is there any debugger I can use? > > >>>>>>>> Or maybe I miss something? > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Copyright year is also 2017 :( > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:09 AM, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> > > > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Korbinian, > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> no problem at all! > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> With the new JavaScriptFilteredHeaderResponse we can continue > to > > >>>>>>> improve > > >>>>>>>>> deferred loading, without having to change anything in Wicket's > > > core > > >>>>>>> Ajax > > >>>>>>>>> handling. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Sven > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Am 01.02.2018 um 17:39 schrieb Korbinian Bachl: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Im really sorry Sven but I broke your defer patch :/ > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> see comment here: > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6498 > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> A solution to it is provided :) > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Von: "Sven Meier" <s...@meiers.net> > > >>>>>>>>>>> An: dev@wicket.apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Februar 2018 14:15:11 > > >>>>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Am I right thinking Wicket 1.5 will be discontinued and > Wicket6 > > >>>>>> will > > >>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>>> moved to "security updates only" mode? > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Yes I think so. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sven > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet mit Blue > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Am 1. Feb. 2018, 14:00, um 14:00, Maxim Solodovnik < > > >>>>>>>> solomax...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>>>>> schrieb: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I have created wicket-8 branch in wicket-site repository. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I believe the main work should be done in 2018/_posts/ > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2018-02-12-wicket-8.0.0-released.md file (I optimistically > > >>>>>> "guess" > > >>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>>>> date to be 2018-02-12 :)) > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Weanwhile I'll update quickstart generator so it will work > > with > > >>>>>>>>>>>> "archetype:generate" 3.0.0+ and snapshot builds > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Am I right thinking Wicket 1.5 will be discontinued and > > Wicket6 > > >>>>>> will > > >>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>>>> moved to "security updates only" mode? > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Andrea Del Bene < > > >>>>>>>> an.delb...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've updated Confluence page to elaborate an answer to > "Not > > >>>>>>> blocking > > >>>>>>>>>>>> but > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> really important" TODOs for Wicket 8. The page is here > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/ToDo+ > > >>>>>>>>>>>> before+GA+release. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please consider to work directly on my comment > > >>>>>> integrating/changing > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> content of my post. This should help to come out with a > final > > >>>>>>> version > > >>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> our official announcement. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:10 PM, Andrea Del Bene > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <an.delb...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Just seen it :-) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2018 20:21, Martin Grigorov wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> https://dzone.com/articles/would-you-use-jsf-for-your- > next-project > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This might be used for inspiration for possible > questions. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Andrea Del Bene > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <an.delb...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've created a Confluence page to collect some ideas on > the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-technical > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tasks we should accomplish before going to roll out Wicket > > 8. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> started > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with some personal thoughts on topic 'JS vs Wicket'. > > Please > > >>>>>> take > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> as > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> raw sketch, something to use for further and better > > exposed > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considerations > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/ > ToDo+ > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before+GA+release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Andrea Del Bene > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <an.delb...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uh sorry, I'm already able to create/edit pages. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Andrea Del Bene < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an.delb...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd rather use Confluence but I think I don't have > enough > > >>>>>>> rights > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> create a page. Who can grant them? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Martin Grigorov < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mgrigo...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can use JIRA for this too. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Andrea Del Bene < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an.delb...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could it be a good idea to create a shared document > > (for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> example on > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Google > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Docs) to start working on non-technical questions? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not blocking but really important: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - have a story to answer "Why not just use XXX.js?" > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - have a story to answer "Isn't Java Server Side > > >>>>>> frameworks > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dead?" > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - have a story to answer "Isn't Java dead" > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a call list for when a reporter wants to have > > >>>>>> contact > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket 8 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and its future (esp. related to questions above) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other things to consider: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://wicketinaction.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>>>> WBR > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>> WBR > > >>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > > >>> > > > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax >
