+1 to release for M9
IMHO a warning should be added with regards to WICKET-6498 as it is not yet
working in a reliable way but may break depending on client specifics;
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Von: "Andrea Del Bene"
> An: dev@wicket.apache.org
> Gesendet: Sonntag,
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote
lasts for 72 hours minimum.
[ ] Yes, release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9
[ ] No, don't release
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 7.10.0
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote
lasts for 72 hours minimum.
[ ] Yes, release Apache Wicket 7.10.0
[ ] No, don't release Apache
Good point. We should also underline that WICKET-6498 breaks custom
response decoration that might be used to place JavaScript inside body tag.
On 11/02/2018 18:16, Korbinian Bachl wrote:
+1 to release for M9
IMHO a warning should be added with regards to WICKET-6498 as it is not yet
Hi,
JavaScriptDeferHeaderResponse is an *alternative* to
JavaScriptFilteredIntoFooterHeaderResponse, it doesn't break anything -
but even if you wanted to, you could use both simultaneously.
Regarding WICKET-6498's experimental status - I've added the following
to the JavaDoc:
* Note:
+1
kind regards
Tobias
> Am 11.02.2018 um 19:11 schrieb Andrea Del Bene :
>
> This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 7.10.0
>
> Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
> linked below.
>
> I have included the signatures for both the source
+1
kind regards
Tobias
> Am 11.02.2018 um 21:24 schrieb Sven Meier :
>
> Hi,
>
> JavaScriptDeferHeaderResponse is an *alternative* to
> JavaScriptFilteredIntoFooterHeaderResponse, it doesn't break anything - but
> even if you wanted to, you could use both simultaneously.
>