On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Gwyn Evans wrote:
We should have a vote on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-983
(Merge the portlet support branch into the trunk)
to decide whether we want this in core now or later.
Choices:
[X ] 1) Merge now and accept the (small but
non-zero)
Let it be IClusterable. please.
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ivaynberg
Date: Fri Nov 2 08:37:31 2007
New Revision: 591368
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=591368view=rev
Log:
make ipageable serializable because we keep direct references to it
Modified:
Frank Bille wrote:
Hey all,
I have build the 1.3.0 final release, and would like everyone to help
testing and approving it. This is the big one, the one that will be talked
about for years to come. So I would like if we could get as many people to
try it out on different platforms/browsers and
Ahmed Al-Obaidy wrote:
Hi Korbinian,
If we take the core of Drupal without its CMS modules, it is more a Web
applications framework than anything. Look at Form, Theme and Data Access APIs.
It is really amazing!
Plus, I'm not talking about porting Drupal to Java, I'm talking about learning
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 15:20 -0800, Jonathan Locke wrote:
almost all of the root form classes and validation are also not specific to
html. while it would be possible to cut and paste this, i wonder if we
shouldn't extract an abstraction here too.
+1
Jonathan Locke wrote:
i'm
[X] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
Martin
[] remove the map and the method for 1.3
[X] remove the map and the method for 1.4
Non-binding
On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 08:01 -0700, Jonathan Locke wrote:
i spent a few hours last night documenting and cleaning up the kitten auth
component i wrote at thoof (thanks to thoof and ian clarke for permission to
open source this). i also wrote an example for it. anyway, was thinking
this
There is a ticket for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1426
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 13:47 +0200, Thijs wrote:
Hi,
The commit on wicket-ajax.js
---
Revision: 628015
Author: jcompagner
Date: 12:20:39, vrijdag 15 februari 2008
Message:
fix for FF that
Spring DM (web.extender) creates a compound ClassLoader from all
imported bundles/libraries and set this loader as context class loader.
So it should see these classes.
I don't see much value of these annotations that Doug proposes (actually
this idea was already discussed before). What's better
Hi,
Browsing the Wicket code I saw that o.a.w.Component has readObject and
writeObject methods which in their current implementation actually do
some specific serialization if the current instance is a Page.
Is there any specific reason to put this code in Component but in Page ?
Currently it
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 20:38 -0700, wch2001 wrote:
Dear all,
I will use the image for button, that means click image to submit side.
add( new ImageButton(submitButton){
@Override
public void onSubmit() {
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 20:41 -0700, Adib Saikali wrote:
Hello Wicket Developers,
Thanks for a great framework. I am studying the source code for Wicket and
have some questions about some parts of the code that are not obvious to me.
I have spent many hours stepping through the code and have
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 20:52 -0700, Adib Saikali wrote:
Hi,
What is the key distinction between RequestParameters and PageParamters why
are two classes needed?
Thakns
Adib
PageParameters is OO representation of the query string. It provides
convenient methods like
El jue, 27-11-2008 a las 15:54 -0600, Jeremy Thomerson escribió:
I am beginning the WS reorg as noted in previous emails. You can monitor
progress here:
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-core/
As we move projects into the wicketstuff-core, I
I had the same problem when I tried to use log4j ver. 1.2.15
Using v. 1.2.14 is ok.
El jue, 04-12-2008 a las 10:11 -0600, Jeremy Thomerson escribió:
It shouldn't be - the only dependency that the core pom gives every project
is wicket (core). Everything else should be optional dependencies.
+1
Currently I use it explicitly in DEV mode
El mié, 04-02-2009 a las 00:23 +0100, Matej Knopp escribió:
in trunk of course..
Hi Loic,
The label could be i18n-ized by using NavigatorLabel.
The last String parameter to StringResourceModel is the default which
will be used if there is nothing in the bundles
Use users@ mailing list for such kind of questions.
El jue, 19-02-2009 a las 15:23 +0100, Loic Descotte escribió:
+1
Additional candidate for this sub-project:
- org.apache.wicket.markup.html.debug.PageView (wicket sub-project)
(maybe you wont be able to move it for 1.4)
El vie, 27-03-2009 a las 23:17 -0500, Jeremy Thomerson escribió:
Please review WICKET-670 [1] and give your input. The idea is
Maybe the idea of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2084
could be incorporated too.
El mar, 31-03-2009 a las 13:13 -0500, Jeremy Thomerson escribió:
That's one of the next things I want to work on later this week. Here's
what I'm thinking:
- Make it so that any debug
[X] Yes release 1.4-rc4
See WebErrorCodeResponseTarget
@devs: why the name of this class is *Response*Target while actually it
is an implementation of I*Request*Target ?
It is a bit confusing/inconsistent.
El dom, 28-06-2009 a las 13:40 +0200, Michael Mosmann escribió:
Hi,
can we extends RedirectRequestTarget
[x] Yes release 1.4-rc7
El vie, 10-07-2009 a las 11:25 -0700, Igor Vaynberg escribió:
I've created a release for Wicket 1.4-rc7. Until it is officially
released, you can download from the following locations:
SVN Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/releases/wicket-1.4-rc7/
M2 Repo:
[X] Yes release 1.4.0
[ ] No, don't release it
Hi Juergen,
I see SVN conflicts in org/apache/wicket/markup/Markup.java committed.
They are in the comments though.
El jue, 17-09-2009 a las 07:46 +0200, Juergen Donnerstag escribió:
I just committed IMarkupFragment to 1.5 trunk. Via
Component.getMarkup() is allows you to get the component's
There is no way to do that with .properties file.
You still may use .yml with Java, there is a Java parsing library.
Google it.
Or use JSON/XML.
El lun, 28-09-2009 a las 18:52 +0200, François-Xavier Lacroix escribió:
Hello everybody
I m new to wicket and i got to make some hooky data in a
El mié, 30-09-2009 a las 07:25 +, Sam Stainsby escribió:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:46:27 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
(non-binding)
[X] Yes release
[ ] No, don't release it and here is why...
(non-binding)
[X] Yes release
[ ] No, don't release it and here is why...
+1 for removing 'I'. I personally do like it but since this is what the
committers prefer than I'm fine.
-1 for renaming Model to anything else.
@Erik: it'd be interesting to be at a course of jWeekend where you'll
explain to the attendees Wicket consists of components, models, ... and
the basic
Model to Locator would
be hell lot more confusing than renaming IModel to Model.
Fully agree.
-Matej
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Martin Grigorov mcgreg...@e-card.bg wrote:
+1 for removing 'I'. I personally do like it but since this is what the
committers prefer than I'm fine.
-1
:48 +0200, Martin Grigorov escribió:
There was only one distributionManagement in wicketstuff-core/pom.xml
(and sub-modules) without the needed setting:
snapshotRepository
idwicketstuff-org-maven/id
urlscpexe://wicketstuff.org/home/wicket/tomcat/webapps/maven/repository/url
/1.4-SNAPSHOT/
johan
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:59, Martin Grigorov mcgreg...@e-card.bg
wrote:
One more fixed: wicketstuff-animator/pom.xml
According to
http://maven.apache.org/pom.html#Distribution_Management
these fixes should be enough
No problems here. Trunk is building successful.
Your problem is just an INFO. This should not fail the build.
And yes, the quickstart has no Mojos. It is not a regular Maven plugin
(Mojo).
El mar, 03-11-2009 a las 22:47 -0600, Jeremy Thomerson escribió:
I'm trying to build trunk to do some test
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 15:59 +0100, Olivier Croisier wrote:
Hi,
WICKET-1847 is more than a year old and has had no activity for more than a
year, whereas the WICKET-1945 was more revent and seemed interesting to me,
so I corrected it.
But in my opinion, even if the former is the target
configuration. Such profiles could be detected using the Service
Provider API for example, and selected by an init-parameter.
What do you think ?
Olivier
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Martin Grigorov mcgreg...@e-card.bg
wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 15:59 +0100, Olivier
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 10:52 +0100, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Guys,
I'd like to discuss the future of the Wicket Security project.
Currently the project lives on/in the wicketstuff repository, but uses
group id and package names org.apache.wicket. IMO We should either:
- adopt Wicket
Igor did the tests but big part of the main code was your work, Matej.
Big ¡Bravo! for both of you!
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 13:44 +0200, Martin Makundi wrote:
Now there is time for RFEs ;) ?
Now is time to migrate apps and see what are the benefits and what is
still missing related to URL
Any reason why this vote is only at dev@ mailing list ?
If my memory serves me well users@ were involved in testing/voting
before.
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 16:13 -0800, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
this vote is to release wicket 1.4.7
this maintenance release brings over 30 bug fixes and improvements.
Please, port your fixes in 1.5 as well.
Thanks!
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 15:53 +0200, Johan Compagner wrote:
I checked today 2 little things in that i would like to have in the next
build
one of this is a small regression from: WICKET-1825
The other is a small fix for the patch that i did
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 20:12 -0400, Michael O'Cleirigh wrote:
Hello,
I've created a new template for wicketstuff-core releases. After every
wicket release we will create a branch from trunk that locks in the
wicket version and cut a matching release like wicketstuff-core-1.4.9.
At a
Hi Jeremy,
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:19 -0500, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
If you use our JIRA for tickets, please note the following couple of
reminders:
- Do not clone an issue that was closed as wont't fix, etc. Just
reopen and comment if you have a new use case that should be
I can confirm - build is OK here.
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 23:43 -0400, Ryan McKinley wrote:
Odd -- can you give me some more info on what fails? This build fine
for me on two different build systems:
[INFO]
[INFO]
Check http://wicket.apache.org/ , section Getting Started and
Documentation Books.
If you use Maven the just copy/paste this on the command line:
mvn archetype:create -DarchetypeGroupId=org.apache.wicket
-DarchetypeArtifactId=wicket-archetype-quickstart
-DarchetypeVersion=1.4.9
Hi,
A have a Wicket 1.5 question:
There is a comment
in org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebApplication.addIgnoreMountPath(String)
:
public final void addIgnoreMountPath(String path)
{
// TODO how is this supposed to work :/
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
Idea:
currently the root
Hi Martijn,
Two commets from me:
- the test is broken ;-) (I'll fix it right away)
- the change is not very i18n friendly, but at least it is easy to extend
2010/7/20 dasho...@apache.org
Author: dashorst
Date: Tue Jul 20 10:28:46 2010
New Revision: 965786
URL:
Hi,
Recently in my company we moved from TeamCity to Hudson for two major
reasons:
- Hudson can start several runners (i.e. build several projects at once)
while TC agent can build at most one project at a time
- Hudson knows Maven, i.e. after building project X it builds all projects
that depend
2010/7/21 jdonners...@apache.org
Author: jdonnerstag
Date: Wed Jul 21 20:43:25 2010
New Revision: 966409
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=966409view=rev
Log:
fixed WICKET-2946 Exceptions raised in overridden sessionDestroyed() event
(of WebApplication class) are completely swallowed
I forgot about this ...
Actually this
is org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebApplication.unmount(String) from
Wicket 1.4.
Don't know why this method is renamed ...
Do we still need it ?
2010/7/19 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
you can by subclassing it...
-igor
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010
Someone mentioned in users@ about a problem with relative paths in TC7 too.
Maybe the examples wont work too.
2010/7/21 Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com
OK seems to be a tomcat 7 incompatibility of hudson...
Martijn
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Martijn Dashorst
Ok, then I'll deprecate it in 1.4 and remove it completely in 1.5
2010/7/22 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
i dont see why
-igor
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
I forgot about this ...
Actually
I'm also +1 to keep them in 1.4.
Addition of new code is not exactly backward incompatible change. The names
of the methods are common so the chance of clash is bigger but still there
is such
chance with any other addition.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Martijn Dashorst
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migration-to-wicket-15.html
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Carl-Eric Menzel cmen...@wicketbuch.dewrote:
Definitely +1 from me for keeping these methods in 1.4.x, with the
additional scope-narrowing changes from Johan. Good ideas! These new
methods will make
+1 for vote in users@
I just found a problem while creating new wicket-example for the new request
mappers:
java.lang.StackOverflowError
at
org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.addedComponent(MarkupContainer.java:978)
at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.add(MarkupContainer.java:168)
at
Hi,
I just added a new wicket-examples application (Wicket 1.5 only) showing two
custom request mappers:
* custom home page - e.g. requesting http://example.com will load
Application#getHomePage() at http://example.com/custom/path
* locale first mapper - the session locale is encoded as first
For now the only tutorial is the source code :-/
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Hi M! Is was there a tutorial on this topic?
**
Martin
2010/7/24 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org:
Hi,
I just added a new wicket-examples
You can do it by sending an email to dev-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Steven Tierney
steven.tier...@brightpurple.co.uk wrote:
Could you please remove me from this mailing list.
Best regards,
Steven
Steven Tierney
Bright Purple Resourcing Ltd
Senior
Hi,
Since recently we have ComponentTag#append(). It will be included in 1.4.10.
Do we need #prepend() as well ?
I can see users starting asking for this.
Hi,
I'm re-introducing https request upgrading (ex. SwitchProtocolRequestTarget)
in Wicket 1.5 - SwitchProtocolRequestHandler.
In 1.4 the user application has to register HttpsRequestCycleProcessor to be
able to use this functionality. In 1.5 there is no IRequestCycleProcessor so
we need another
Option 1 is committed with r981030.
I'll re-work it if we decide that there is a better solution.
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi,
I'm re-introducing https request upgrading (ex.
SwitchProtocolRequestTarget) in Wicket 1.5
a better way may be:
myapplication#init() {
setRootRequestMapper(new HttpsHandler(getRootRequestHandler(),
httpsConfig));
}
that way it fits in nicely with the idea of bolt-on request mappers
and allows users more control.
-igor
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo
The regression is fixed.
Thanks
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
fixed it and added a test case. Tested it against a quickstart. It
should now be ok. Could you please check. Thanks
Juergen
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Martin
Now another test is failing:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Apache%20Wicket%201.5.x/org.apache.wicket$wicket/197/testReport/junit/org.apache.wicket.protocol.http/WicketFilterTest/testCheckRedirect_1/
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote
There is such project in wicketstuff projects
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:21 PM, armandoxxx armando@dropchop.com wrote:
HI guys ..
I know it's an old post .. but did you ever implement this
AutoCompleObjectTextField idea you had ?
Kind regards
Armando
--
View this message in
I want to fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2964 for the next
1.4 release.
I'll have time this weekend.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com
wrote:
Does everyone have everything they want in for 1.4.10? I think we should
push a release
No errors here too with both jdk 1.5 and 1.6.
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.comwrote:
Well, on my laptop I have to regularly switch between 5 and 6, so there's
really no telling. :)
On Aug 7, 2010 12:24 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
Please test the release and offer your vote:
[x] Yes, release
[ ] No, don't release it (and please tell us why)
My first binding vote!
I played some more with 1.5 (trunk) lately so I want to vote for its M1
release without playing with just released tag :-)
This is milestone release so it is
[x] Yes, release
[ ] No, don't release it (and please tell us why)
mvn clean install passed
tried random examples - all good
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote:
+1
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 20:23, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
This vote
changed that it was able to build for you?
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
weird. compiles here with 6 but not with 5 :| i guess one of you guys
will have to do the build.
-igor
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Michael O'Cleirigh
michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca wrote:
Hello,
Since the switch to the new wicketstuff.org hudson build server some
projects haven't been building because they have java6 dependencies. With
the 1.4.10 release occurring soon I need trunk to be
Hi,
I would like to ask wicketstuff.org maintainers to update the examples
deployed at this machine to latest 1.4.10 and 1.5-M1 versions.
Recently we had a ticket about broken 1.4 examples but everything was fine
in the latest snapshot (running the examples locally). Do you think it is a
good
Is this related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2977 or this
is something different ?
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:23 PM, jcompag...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jcompagner
Date: Thu Aug 12 14:23:34 2010
New Revision: 984800
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=984800view=rev
should have the latest now.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 16:55, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
Here is a URL to latest build at Hudson:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Apache%20Wicket%201.4.x/ws/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-examples/target/wicket-examples.war
I think
I'm to blame for the first one...
Both english locale and skipTests should be ok.
2010/8/13 Major Péter majorpe...@sch.bme.hu
Hi,
I've tried to compile wicket trunk, but 3 test was failing for me:
Failed tests:
Hi,
With r985443 the support for portlets is completely removed.
The code is copied to
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-portlets
.
Check the list of modified files in the commit to see which other files in
Wicket are modified.
To bring the wicketstuff
I agree for BrowserInfoPage! Will move it to WebSession.
Not sure about ClientInfo ... WebSession returns the specialization
WebClientInfo
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
ClientInfo and newBrowserInfoPage have been added to Session though
As solution I can see using HttpServletRequestWrapper instead of dealing
directly with the HttpServletRequest passed by the container.
This way we can provide custom implementation of HttpServletRequestWrapper
that overrides javax.servlet.ServletRequestWrapper.getCharacterEncoding()
and if
[ x ] - trunk to track 1.5, branch for 1.4.11-SNAPSHOT and subsequent
releases. (+:no merge later; -: trunk will be broken for an extended period)
[ ] - trunk stays on 1.4.x, create new branch to track 1.5-M1. (+: no
switch is needed; -: at some point need to merge the branch back into trunk)
fixed. thanks!
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Daniel Soneira (JIRA) j...@apache.orgwrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12898941#action_12898941]
Daniel Soneira commented on
+1 release
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 release.
-igor
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
This vote is to release wicket 1.4.11
Branch:
Hi Peter,
Is there a reason to remove final from
- public static final CharSequence throttleScript(CharSequence script,
String throttleId,
+ public static CharSequence throttleScript(CharSequence script,
String throttleId,
Duration throttleDelay)
?
I don't see a reason
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:51 PM, chitrabhanu.das
chitrabhanu@gmail.comwrote:
Hey guys I am pretty much stuck integrating wicket and spring my
program details are
applicationContext.xml
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
beans default-autowire=autodetect
The main new feature is WICKET-1312 - event-based notification mechanism.
Also there are some new request mappers - httpsmapper, packagemapper and
resourcemapper.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there noteworthy changes other than the
This is getting hard :-)
I don't know a way to call event.preventDefault() inside dispatchEvent().
Calling it before calling dispatchEvent() doesn't work.
Other solution would be to get reference(s) to all registered listeners and
call them manually, but again I don't know a way to do this.
On
-1
Please rebuild with the fix in WICKET-3040
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
-1 until WICKET-3042 is fixed.
-igor
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 7:07 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 when this is fixed :
https://oss.sonatype.org/index.html#nexus-search;quick~wicket-shiro
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to make sure that wicket-shiro is included in the next
wicketstuff release. When I build:
Emma, just send an email to
dev-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Emma Moss e.m...@hurstuk.com wrote:
Can you pls take me of the list, I do not wish to receive these emails
Many Thanks Emma
-Original Message-
From: Ryan McKinley
+1
mvn clean install passes successfully
tried random examples - all ok
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:45 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
This vote is to release wicket 1.4.12. This release fixes a critical
problem with 1.4.11 namely WICKET-3040.
Branch:
+1
mvn clean install passes
random examples - some images resources are with wrong path, tree components
log warnings related to migration from 1.4 to 1.5, stockquote example blocks
(it seems we need to change the provider)
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Igor Vaynberg
Looks good to me.
I've never seen that this ctor looks this way and I don't remember
discussion related to that.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
My apologies if this has been discussed before...
Right now the constructor of
15, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
Looks good to me.
I've never seen that this ctor looks this way and I don't remember
discussion related to that.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
My apologies
Looking at the code I see the problem is
org.apache.wicket.model.CompoundPropertyModel.setChainedModel(IModel?)
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:
Don't hesitate to provide patches ;-)
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier
Fixed with r997665
Thanks!
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
If I do a clean check-out of trunk and try mvn eclipse:eclipse it
fails. The reason seems to be version 1.5-M2.1 on poms. Shouldn't
this be 1.5-SNAPSHOT for trunk?
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade wicketstuff-inmethod-grid to Wicket 1.5:
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-core/jdk-1.5-parent/inmethod-grid-parent
Making it compiling was easy. Now there is one problem (on two places) - the
code uses some advanced
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade wicketstuff-inmethod-grid to Wicket 1.5:
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-core/jdk-1.5-parent/inmethod-grid-parent
Making it compiling
Hi Peter,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:40 AM, p...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pete
Date: Wed Sep 15 22:39:59 2010
New Revision: 997528
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997528view=rev
Log:
fixed non-working ajax redirects: WICKET-3048
Modified:
of stuck there.
Note my TODO in ServletWebRequest line 389 :-(
If you can figure out a clean way to get this done I will appreciate that
:-)
Am 19.09.2010 um 16:22 schrieb Martin Grigorov:
Hi Peter,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:40 AM, p...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pete
Date
to proceed.
Igor mentioned that abstract WebRequest does not necessarily have to be
ServletWebRequest when running in different containers.
@dev: any opinions on that?
Am 20.09.2010 um 10:30 schrieb Martin Grigorov:
Please review r998677.
I implemented the logic we discussed in IRC with you
/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+1.5
Page
*edited* by Martin Grigorov
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/~martin-ghttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/%7Emartin-g
Changes (1)
...
|
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebApplication.newWebResponse
See http://wicketstuff.org/wicket/authorization/ for example.
Wicket throws org.apache.wicket.authorization.AuthorizationException and
shows AccessDeniedPage by default.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:59 PM, hemilshah hemil.s...@consult.nordea.comwrote:
So does it mean that Wicket continuously keep
Isn't that fixed already ...
I committed in svn site/. Maybe I did something wrong with Jekyll.
I'll check
2010/10/1 Major Péter majorpe...@sch.bme.hu
Hi,
Use archetype:generate instead.
Regards,
Peter
2010-10-01 15:01 keltezéssel, nino martinez wael írta:
D:\nino\develop\netdesignmvn
looking for
2010-10-01 15:35 keltezéssel, Martin Grigorov írta:
Isn't that fixed already ...
I committed in svn site/. Maybe I did something wrong with Jekyll.
I'll check
2010/10/1 Major Péter majorpe...@sch.bme.hu
Hi,
Use archetype:generate instead.
Regards,
Peter
2010-10-01
1 - 100 of 2727 matches
Mail list logo
