I wouldn't mind having more abilities available at github. I don't see any
downsides other than some work on our documentation and the migration.
Martijn
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> I haven't seen any documentation too.
> As far as I understand it this service jus
I would for this integration
currently there too much (duplicated) emails regarding git commits
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> I haven't seen any documentation too.
> As far as I understand it this service just replaces git-wip with github.com,
> i.e. we will have more
I haven't seen any documentation too.
As far as I understand it this service just replaces git-wip with github.com,
i.e. we will have more (all ?!) permissions at
https://github.com/apache/wicket and we will be able to merge PRs by
clicking buttons.
https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/ - here you can
I see no documentation at all :(((
Maybe you can share some links?
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> This is what Wicket uses now.
> It didn't happen to you because you haven't merged PRs from GitHub.
>
> See https://gitbox.apache.org. although it is not well documented ye
This is what Wicket uses now.
It didn't happen to you because you haven't merged PRs from GitHub.
See https://gitbox.apache.org. although it is not well documented yet.
On Aug 6, 2017 8:33 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" wrote:
> We are using git at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/ and it
> seem
We are using git at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/ and it
seems to produce less emails ...
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> As you may have noticed merging PRs from GitHub creates a lot of email and
> git history noise.
>
> What do you think about mo
