Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1246
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1228
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user cloverhearts opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1256
[ ZEPPELIN-1259 ] create ace.editor configuration manager service object
### What is this PR for?
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1218
Establish a foundation to personalize
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1254
@bzz CI failure was due to test, fixed now.
Further, regarding the flexibility and narrowing scope. Revision class is
implemented
Github user rconline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1236
@felixcheung i think this will continue to remain a problem, till the time
we allow all user roles to setup/modify these permissions. Unless we can
recognize and separate this as an admin
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1254
@khalidhuseynov glad to hear. But CI is red again, could you, as an author
of PR please post here the reason of failure? This will save time for the
reviewers.
And thank you for kind for the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1249
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1231
Sorry, was quite a busy week.
Great progress so far, from the first glance and on the formal side of the
contribution:
1. CI is failing, could you please post here the reason of
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1239
Looks great to me.
CI failure:
```
[INFO] Zeppelin: web Application .. FAILURE [02:13
min]
...
[INFO] Running 'grunt build --no-color' in
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1239
Rebased it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user minahlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1239
Confirm that bug is gone. @jongyoul Could you rebase before merge?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jimdowling commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1255
@zjffdu - I don't think there's a ZeppelinContext available in Livy. Would
this be acceptable until the ZeppelinContext becomes available? As of now, Livy
is not that much use if you cannot
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1244
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user khalidhuseynov closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1254
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user khalidhuseynov reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1254
[ZEPPELIN-1257] storage - fix get note revision api
### What is this PR for?
Getting revision of note requires only unique revision id and the whole
revision object isn't required.
Github user astroshim closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1229
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1229
re-trigger CI
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
GitHub user astroshim reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1229
[BugFix] Show checkbox for "Connect to existing process" on interpreter
menu.
### What is this PR for?
This PR fixes a bug of showing checkbox for "Connect to existing process"
on
Github user astroshim closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1229
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1229
re-trigger CI
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
GitHub user astroshim reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1229
[BugFix] Show checkbox for "Connect to existing process" on interpreter
menu.
### What is this PR for?
This PR fixes a bug of showing checkbox for "Connect to existing process"
on
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Minudika Malshan
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently I am working on above subjected issue. I went through the
> implementation of notebook.html[1] and notebook.controller.js.[2]
> I want to know the location of the notebook-controller.js where
Github user prasadwagle commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1240
I rebased my branch of latest master and pushed it to origin, closed and
reopened pull request but the travis build hasn't started. What is the reason
for that?
```
Github user minahlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/673
@zjffdu If you click gear button located top right side, it will toggle
repository management page
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1255
@jimdowling Right, there's no ZeppelinContext in livy right now. Would
allowing user to specify jars/packages when creating livy session more general
? (like --jars/--packages in spark-submit)
Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-1263:
Summary: Should specify zeppelin's spark configuration through
--conf arguments of spark-submit
Key: ZEPPELIN-1263
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1263
GitHub user prasadwagle reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1240
[ZEPPELIN-1246] In JDBCInterpreter.getScheduler, use
getMaxConcurrentConnection instead of hardcoding maxConcurrency to 10
### What is this PR for?
In JDBCInterpreter.getScheduler, use
Github user prasadwagle closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1240
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user prasadwagle reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1240
[ZEPPELIN-1246] In JDBCInterpreter.getScheduler, use
getMaxConcurrentConnection instead of hardcoding maxConcurrency to 10
### What is this PR for?
In JDBCInterpreter.getScheduler, use
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1236
I think a part of this problem is solved by
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/993
([ZEPPELIN-987](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-987)). But, yes
I agree this has
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1223
I'll do this at the another PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user astroshim closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1223
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1193
\cc @bzz for review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Khalid Huseynov created ZEPPELIN-1264:
-
Summary: CI failure on master with ParallelSchedulerTest
Key: ZEPPELIN-1264
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1264
Project: Zeppelin
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1256
@corneadoug
please, can you review for this pr?
i divided to https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1218 pr.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Originally, the default interpreter is never saved on front-end side.
It is set on back-end side.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Minudika Malshan
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Minudika Malshan
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Currently
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1254
@bzz regarding the CI issue, I keep getting the following:
```
14:05:27,226 ERROR
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.remote.RemoteInterpreter:237 - Failed to create
interpreter:
Github user mwkang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1248
@jongyoul Can you review this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
38 matches
Mail list logo