Re: CI and Pull request validation - too many CI servers ?

2022-10-04 Thread tison
I think the Jenkins and GHA workflow can be duplicated. Although, I don't have time to work on it right now :) Best, tison. Andor Molnar 于2022年9月30日周五 22:16写道: > People was excited to try out new technologies. :) > ASF Jenkins is the "official" one, if we can say that. > > Andor > > > > > On

Re: CI and Pull request validation - too many CI servers ?

2022-09-30 Thread Andor Molnar
People was excited to try out new technologies. :) ASF Jenkins is the "official" one, if we can say that. Andor On Thu, 2022-09-29 at 15:38 +0200, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hello ZooKeepers, > Currently we are testing our PRs using: > - GitHub actions > - Travis > - ASF Jenkins > > Honestly I

Re: CI and Pull request validation - too many CI servers ?

2022-09-29 Thread tison
IIRC GHA provides only x86_64 machines that can be an issue to use Travis _or_ Jenkins. Best, tison. Enrico Olivelli 于2022年9月29日周四 21:41写道: > Hello ZooKeepers, > Currently we are testing our PRs using: > - GitHub actions > - Travis > - ASF Jenkins > > Honestly I can't remember why we have so

CI and Pull request validation - too many CI servers ?

2022-09-29 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hello ZooKeepers, Currently we are testing our PRs using: - GitHub actions - Travis - ASF Jenkins Honestly I can't remember why we have so many different technologies. Does anyone remember ? I think that GH is the most comprehensive suite. Any volunteer for tidying up this situation ? Enrico