Hello,
PcdMemoryProfilePropertyMask declared as a PcdsFixedAtBuild type
It means user should recompile source code if he wants to change this pcd
default value.
So, could we declare it as a PcdsDynamic type?
So, user could change PcdMemoryProfilePropertyMask's setting value through BIOS
Chao,
Current patch introduces the CpuMmuInitLib which contains
ConfigureMemoryManagementUnit () API. You told me the API will be called by a
PEIM.
Then, the new proposal is to move the library code into that PEIM.
I don't quite understand your needs of the new GUID to store the memory map
This optional plugin is designed to execute before the FSP SecCore to
rebase SecCore and PeiCore during runtime. If the FSP binary requires
rebasing at runtime, this module should be included within the FSP
binary. Additionally, specific patches must be applied to ensure proper
functionality.
In
Thank you Michael & Gerd, it does the problem of
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2064.
The issue is gone with latest QEMU version.
Thanks,
Jiaxin
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Kubacki
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 8:55 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Wu, Jiaxin ;
Hi,
Is there any plan to upstream these HEST/ACPI patches? They seem to be arch
agnostic.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#117526): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/117526
Mute This Topic:
SCT spec: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4374
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4419
-Implement MemoryOverwriteRequestControlLock Locked with
Key State test cases
-Add remaining Assertions 32 - 49 from SCT spec
-Add Test Case to
SCT spec: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4374
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4419
-Implement MemoryOverwriteRequestControlLock Locked No Key
State test cases
-Add Assertions 21 - 31 from SCT spec
-Add Test Case to MemoryOverwriteRequestFunctionTest
Cc: G
SCT spec: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4374
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4419
-Implement MemoryOverwriteRequestControlLock Unlocked State
test cases
-Add Assertions 17, 18, 19, and 20 from SCT spec
-Add Test Case to MemoryOverwriteRequestFunctionTest
SCT spec: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4374
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4419
-Implement MemoryOverwriteRequestControlLockSetVariable test
cases
-Add Assertions 7 through 16 from SCT spec
-Add Test Case to MemoryOverwriteRequestFunctionTest
Cc: G
SCT spec: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4374
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4419
-Implement MemoryOverwriteRequestControlSetVariable test cases
-Add Assertions 5 and 6 from SCT spec
-Add Test Case to MemoryOverwriteRequestFunctionTest
Cc: G Edhaya Chandran
From: "Abhi.Singh"
SCT spec: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4374
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4419
-Implement initial test infrastructure for all test cases
including updates to: CommonGenFramework.sh, UEFI_SCT.dsc,
and Category.ini.
-Add Guid.c and
Updates after feedback from Sunny
-updated several SCT assertion string outputs
-these were done make the assertions more descriptive
-fixed the issue in patch 5/6 that contained stray chars
from a merge
Patch series:
These tests support platform firmware that implement
Hi Ray,
I'm willing change it to a PEIM if it doesn't fit as a library. I think
if it is a PEIM, we need a new GUID to sotre the memory map resouce, or
use an already defined GUID.
I will put it under the UefiCpuPkg, called CpuMmuInitPei, folder:
UefiCpuPkg/CpuMmuInitPei/LoongArch64/. May
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:48 AM Qingyu wrote:
>
> Refer to Uefi spec 2.10 section 11.11.2, add a new retval
> EFI_NOT_FOUND to EFI_ADAPTER_INFORMATION_PROTOCOL.GetInformation().
> Reference: [mantis #1866] - GetInfo() of Adapter Information
> Protocol should have a provision for IHV to return no
Chao,
Sorry I missed your mail.
If ConfigureMemoryManagementUnit() is called in PEI, can you move the logic to
a LoongArch specific PEIM? My concern is we may need more review on the lib API
ConfigureMemoryManagementUnit() if we position it as a library.
If we move the logic in a PEIM and the
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni
Thanks,
Ray
From: Shang, Qingyu
Sent: Monday, April 8, 2024 17:47
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Pedro Falcato ; Ni, Ray ; Gahan
Saraiya
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] OptionRomPkg: Update the comments of GetInformation
function
Refer to Uefi spec
*Reminder: TianoCore Bug Triage - APAC / NAMO*
*When:*
Tuesday, April 9, 2024
6:30pm to 7:30pm
(UTC-07:00) America/Los Angeles
*Where:*
Might be related to this issue
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2064.
On 4/8/2024 4:33 AM, Wu, Jiaxin wrote:
Hi Gerd,
With below OVMF build and QEMU command, OVMF hangs after SendSmiIpi
(mBspApicId) during SmmRelocateBases(), is there any issues with latest
code to support SMM
*Tools, CI, Code base construction meeting series*
*When:*
Monday, April 8, 2024
4:30pm to 5:30pm
(UTC-07:00) America/Los Angeles
*Where:*
Pushed as 39bb294
> -Original Message-
> From: Hsueh, DoraX
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 10:48 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Hsueh, DoraX ; Chaganty, Rangasai V
> ; Chuang, Rosen ;
> Kasbekar, Saloni ; Tang, Haoyu
> ; Desimone, Nathaniel L
>
> Subject: [PATCH]
Reviewed-by: Nate DeSimone
> -Original Message-
> From: Hsueh, DoraX
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 10:48 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Hsueh, DoraX ; Chaganty, Rangasai V
> ; Chuang, Rosen ;
> Kasbekar, Saloni ; Tang, Haoyu
> ; Desimone, Nathaniel L
>
> Subject: [PATCH]
Pushed as e0051bc
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of
> dorax.hs...@intel.com
> Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 10:32 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Hsueh, DoraX ; Chaganty, Rangasai V
> ; Chuang, Rosen ;
> Kasbekar, Saloni ; Tang, Haoyu
>
> Subject:
Reviewed-by: Nate DeSimone
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of
> dorax.hs...@intel.com
> Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 10:32 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Hsueh, DoraX ; Chaganty, Rangasai V
> ; Chuang, Rosen ;
> Kasbekar, Saloni ; Tang, Haoyu
>
>
*Reminder: Tools, CI, Code base construction meeting series*
*When:*
Monday, April 8, 2024
4:30pm to 5:30pm
(UTC-07:00) America/Los Angeles
*Where:*
Hi Dora,
Removing FvAdvanced in a violation of the MinPlatform specification. The
relevant section is here:
https://tianocore-docs.github.io/edk2-MinimumPlatformSpecification/draft/appendix_a_full_maps/a1_firmware_volume_layout.html#a1-firmware-volume-layout
Please add FvAdvanced back into the
Pushed as 1c41906
> -Original Message-
> From: Shang, Qingyu
> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2024 2:47 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Chiu, Chasel ; Desimone, Nathaniel L
> ; Liming Gao ;
> Dong, Eric ; Gahan Saraiya
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] MinPlatformPkg: Update the comments of
>
Reviewed-by: Nate DeSimone
> -Original Message-
> From: Shang, Qingyu
> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2024 2:47 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Chiu, Chasel ; Desimone, Nathaniel L
> ; Liming Gao ;
> Dong, Eric ; Gahan Saraiya
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] MinPlatformPkg: Update the comments of
Reviewed-by: Nate DeSimone
> -Original Message-
> From: Duggapu, Chinni B
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 10:06 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Chaganty, Rangasai V ; Desimone,
> Nathaniel L ; Chiu, Chasel
> ; Duggapu, Chinni B
> Subject: [PATCH v6 3/3] IntelFsp2WrapperPkg: Fix UPD
Reviewed-by: Nate DeSimone
> -Original Message-
> From: Duggapu, Chinni B
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 10:06 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Chaganty, Rangasai V ; Desimone,
> Nathaniel L ; Chiu, Chasel
> ; Duggapu, Chinni B
> Subject: [PATCH v6 2/3] IntelFsp2WrapperPkg: Fsp T new
Hi Chinni,
One minor feedback below. With that change...
Reviewed-by: Nate DeSimone
> -Original Message-
> From: Duggapu, Chinni B
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 10:06 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Chaganty, Rangasai V ; Desimone,
> Nathaniel L ; Chiu, Chasel
> ; Duggapu, Chinni
Does anybody have any suggestions who I should cc as regards this?
Is it preferred to make a bugtracker issue too?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#117500): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/117500
Mute This Topic:
Refer to Uefi spec 2.10 section 11.11.2, add a new retval
EFI_NOT_FOUND to EFI_ADAPTER_INFORMATION_PROTOCOL.GetInformation().
Reference: [mantis #1866] - GetInfo() of Adapter Information
Protocol should have a provision for IHV to return no data.
Cc: Marcin Wojtas
Signed-off-by: Qingyu
Refer to Uefi spec 2.10 section 11.11.2, add a new retval
EFI_NOT_FOUND to EFI_ADAPTER_INFORMATION_PROTOCOL.GetInformation().
Reference: [mantis #1866] - GetInfo() of Adapter Information
Protocol should have a provision for IHV to return no data.
Cc: Chasel Chiu
Cc: Nate DeSimone
Cc: Liming Gao
Refer to Uefi spec 2.10 section 11.11.2, add a new retval
EFI_NOT_FOUND to EFI_ADAPTER_INFORMATION_PROTOCOL.GetInformation().
Reference: [mantis #1866] - GetInfo() of Adapter Information
Protocol should have a provision for IHV to return no data.
Cc: Pedro Falcato
Cc: Ray Ni
Signed-off-by:
Refer to Uefi spec 2.10 section 11.11.2, add a new retval
EFI_NOT_FOUND to EFI_ADAPTER_INFORMATION_PROTOCOL.GetInformation().
Reference: [mantis #1866] - GetInfo() of Adapter Information
Protocol should have a provision for IHV to return no data.
This patch series update GetInformation() API
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 08:33:30AM +, Wu, Jiaxin wrote:
> Hi Gerd,
>
> With below OVMF build and QEMU command, OVMF hangs after SendSmiIpi
> (mBspApicId) during SmmRelocateBases(), is there any issues with
> latest code to support SMM on OVMF or my local command/configuration
> issue?
Have
Refer to Uefi spec 2.10 section 11.11.2, add a new retval
EFI_NOT_FOUND to EFI_ADAPTER_INFORMATION_PROTOCOL.GetInformation().
Reference: [mantis #1866] - GetInfo() of Adapter Information
Protocol should have a provision for IHV to return no data.
Cc: Liming Gao
Cc: Michael D Kinney
Cc: Zhiguang
Hi Gerd,
With below OVMF build and QEMU command, OVMF hangs after SendSmiIpi
(mBspApicId) during SmmRelocateBases(), is there any issues with latest code to
support SMM on OVMF or my local command/configuration issue?
Build (latest edk2 code):
build -p OvmfPkg\OvmfPkgIa32X64.dsc -a IA32 -a X64
On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 02:41:54PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> From: Phillip Tennen
>
> From: Phillip Tennen
>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4747
>
> UsbMouseDxe was missing from the OVMF build description, so=20
> the Simple Pointer Protocol wasn't usable from
39 matches
Mail list logo
