On 07/31/20 19:32, Sean Brogan wrote:
> You can see the ReadMe badge showing the broken state of edk2 master.
> The build with logs can be seen here
>
On 07/31/20 23:14, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Regarding actual actions: I'm going to be away for a short while now.
> Plus, I'm not entirely sure what exactly is being prevented by the
> current state of the tree (i.e., how grave the regression is).
>
> (1) If the current issue interferes with work
Hi Sean,
thank you for reporting this. I apologize for the breakage. Please see
my comments below.
(Rebecca and the stewards should read on as well, please.)
On 07/31/20 19:32, Sean Brogan wrote:
> This patch as committed is breaking CI. It was not captured in PR
> because the PR optimizes to
On 7/31/20 11:32 AM, Sean Brogan wrote:
This patch as committed is breaking CI. It was not captured in PR
because the PR optimizes to detect packages impacted by the commits
and the BhyvePkg addition is not depended on by other packages (that
are in CI). BhyvePkg which is nested inside
This patch as committed is breaking CI. It was not captured in PR
because the PR optimizes to detect packages impacted by the commits and
the BhyvePkg addition is not depended on by other packages (that are in
CI). BhyvePkg which is nested inside OvmfPkg ( a violation of DEC spec:
see
On 07/31/20 15:07, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 07/31/20 07:17, Rebecca Cran wrote:
>> On 7/13/20 2:25 PM, Rebecca Cran wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/13/20 12:09 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>>
Can you please ping me when the PatchCheck.py problem has been solved,
so I can go ahead with the merge?
>>>
>>>
On 07/31/20 07:17, Rebecca Cran wrote:
> On 7/13/20 2:25 PM, Rebecca Cran wrote:
>
>> On 7/13/20 12:09 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>
>>> Can you please ping me when the PatchCheck.py problem has been solved,
>>> so I can go ahead with the merge?
>>
>> Will do.
>
>
> Hi Laszlo,
>
>
> I just
On 7/13/20 2:25 PM, Rebecca Cran wrote:
On 7/13/20 12:09 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Can you please ping me when the PatchCheck.py problem has been solved,
so I can go ahead with the merge?
Will do.
Hi Laszlo,
I just rebased the bhyve commit against the latest edk2 master with no
On 7/13/20 12:09 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Can you please ping me when the PatchCheck.py problem has been solved,
so I can go ahead with the merge?
Will do.
--
Rebecca Cran
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#62455):
On 7/13/20 10:16 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
My understanding has been that you and Peter Grehan would be added as
"R"s to Maintainers.txt, covering "OvmfPkg/Bhyve/".
Has anything changed in that regard?
No, that's still the plan. I'll update Maintainers.txt in a follow-up patch.
--
Rebecca
Hi Rebecca,
On 07/13/20 18:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 07/13/20 07:41, Rebecca Cran wrote:
>> BhyvePkg supports the bhyve hypervisor, which is a hypervisor/virtual
>> machine manager available on FreeBSD, macOS and Illumos.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rebecca Cran
>> ---
>>
On 07/13/20 07:41, Rebecca Cran wrote:
> BhyvePkg supports the bhyve hypervisor, which is a hypervisor/virtual
> machine manager available on FreeBSD, macOS and Illumos.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rebecca Cran
> ---
> OvmfPkg/Bhyve/AcpiPlatformDxe/AcpiPlatform.c | 251 +++
>
On 07/13/20 07:41, Rebecca Cran wrote:
> BhyvePkg supports the bhyve hypervisor, which is a hypervisor/virtual
> machine manager available on FreeBSD, macOS and Illumos.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rebecca Cran
> ---
> OvmfPkg/Bhyve/AcpiPlatformDxe/AcpiPlatform.c | 251 +++
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
