On 07/16/19 12:05, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Laszlo,
>
> On 7/2/19 12:28 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Rewrite Base64Decode() from scratch, due to reasons listed in the second
>> reference below.
>>
>> Implement Base64Decode() according to the specification added in the
>> previous patch.
>> Marvin Häuser ; Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
>>
>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] MdePkg/BaseLib: rewrite
>> Base64Decode()
>>
>> On 07/15/19 17:22, Gao, Liming wrote:
>>> Laszlo:
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>&
Hi Laszlo,
On 7/2/19 12:28 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Rewrite Base64Decode() from scratch, due to reasons listed in the second
> reference below.
>
> Implement Base64Decode() according to the specification added in the
> previous patch. The decoder scans the input buffer once, it has no inner
>
; Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2019 3:31 AM
> >> To: Gao, Zhichao ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao,
> >> Liming ; Kinney, Michael D
> >>
> >> Cc: Marvin Häuser ; Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> >>
> >> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] MdePkg/BaseLib: re
Hi Marvin,
On 07/15/19 20:44, Marvin Häuser wrote:
> I feel like my rushed message mentioning 'MAX_ADDRESS' was misleading
> a little - the point with that was a potential index overflow (I may
> actually have meant 'MAX_UINTN', I am not sure about the details
> anymore) in the original code, I
Gao, Liming
>> ; Kinney, Michael D
>>
>> Cc: Marvin Häuser ; Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
>>
>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] MdePkg/BaseLib: rewrite Base64Decode()
>>
>> On 07/12/19 04:31, Gao, Zhichao wrote:
>>> Sorry for late respond.
>>
;
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé ; Zhichao Gao
>
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] MdePkg/BaseLib: rewrite Base64Decode()
>
> Rewrite Base64Decode() from scratch, due to reasons listed in the second
> reference below.
>
> Implement Base64Decode() according to the specificati
; Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] MdePkg/BaseLib: rewrite Base64Decode()
>
> On 07/12/19 04:31, Gao, Zhichao wrote:
> > Sorry for late respond.
> > The whole code is OK for me. And I write a tiny test for it without the
> > memory address
;
>> -Original Message-
>> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
>> Laszlo Ersek
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2019 6:29 PM
>> To: edk2-devel-groups-io
>> Cc: Gao, Liming ; Marvin Häuser
>> ; Kinney, Michael D ;
&
zlo Ersek
> Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2019 6:29 PM
> To: edk2-devel-groups-io
> Cc: Gao, Liming ; Marvin Häuser
> ; Kinney, Michael D ;
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé ; Gao, Zhichao
>
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] MdePkg/BaseLib: rewrite Base64Decode()
>
> Rewrite Base64D
Rewrite Base64Decode() from scratch, due to reasons listed in the second
reference below.
Implement Base64Decode() according to the specification added in the
previous patch. The decoder scans the input buffer once, it has no inner
loop(s), and it spills each output byte as soon as the output
11 matches
Mail list logo
