On 12/12/23 02:20, Tan, Dun wrote:
> Hi Laszlo,
>
> Thanks for your reply. Sorry that I didn't add you in the reviewer list from
> the beginning of this patch series review. About the patch review, please
> take your time. Also take care your body!
>
> The patch set was reviewed-by Ray last
Hi Laszlo,
Thanks for your reply. Sorry that I didn't add you in the reviewer list from
the beginning of this patch series review. About the patch review, please take
your time. Also take care your body!
The patch set was reviewed-by Ray last week. So I think we can merge the patch
set first.
Hi Dun,
On 12/11/23 04:16, Tan, Dun wrote:
> Hi Laszlo,
>
> Previously I sent a patch set " Move gMpInformationHobGuid from
> StandaloneMmPkg to UefiCpuPkg. " and thanks for your review. To solve the
> issue that the maximum length of one HOB might not be enough when CPU count
> is 1-2000 or
Hi Laszlo,
Previously I sent a patch set " Move gMpInformationHobGuid from StandaloneMmPkg
to UefiCpuPkg. " and thanks for your review. To solve the issue that the
maximum length of one HOB might not be enough when CPU count is 1-2000 or
bigger and extend the HOB, we decide to create a new
In the V3 patch set,
In patch "UefiCpuPkg: Build MpInfo2HOB in CpuMpPei", the DEBUG message format
is modified
In patch "UefiCpuPkg: Consume MpInfo2Hob in PiSmmCpuDxe", remove unneccesary
assert check.
In patch "UefiCpuPkg: Avoid assuming only one smmbasehob", free allocated
buffer when error
