On 2020.05.06 13:50, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 5/6/20 2:45 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
On 2020.05.06 13:26, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 5/6/20 1:37 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
...
Therefore, since we do see a need for ACPI 6.x features, and
effectively have a 6.3 table with PPTT, and also since we have
On 5/6/20 2:45 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
On 2020.05.06 13:26, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 5/6/20 1:37 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
...
Therefore, since we do see a need for ACPI 6.x features, and
effectively have a 6.3 table with PPTT, and also since we have
tested that we are not seeing ill effects from
On 2020.05.06 13:26, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 5/6/20 1:37 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
...
Therefore, since we do see a need for ACPI 6.x features, and
effectively have a 6.3 table with PPTT, and also since we have
tested that we are not seeing ill effects from doing so for the
most common OSes we
On 5/6/20 1:37 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
...
Therefore, since we do see a need for ACPI 6.x features, and
effectively have a 6.3 table with PPTT, and also since we have
tested that we are not seeing ill effects from doing so for the
most common OSes we support, we bring all of the relevant ACPI
Because of its widespread availability and low price, we expect the
Raspberry Pi source to be used by platform developers as a starting
point to create their own platform implementation.
As such, it makes a lot of sense to want to use the most up to date
underlying standards, even if the pay off
