On 2019.10.10 17:49, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 01:41:20PM +0100, Pete Batard wrote:
It's a disagreement. And the same goes for 3/5 & 4/5. Please see the note I
wrote in 0/5 for the v2, because the cover letter this is usually the place
I try to clarify elements that may throw
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 01:41:20PM +0100, Pete Batard wrote:
> It's a disagreement. And the same goes for 3/5 & 4/5. Please see the note I
> wrote in 0/5 for the v2, because the cover letter this is usually the place
> I try to clarify elements that may throw off a maintainer, and that don't
>
Hi Leif,
It's a disagreement. And the same goes for 3/5 & 4/5. Please see the
note I wrote in 0/5 for the v2, because the cover letter this is usually
the place I try to clarify elements that may throw off a maintainer, and
that don't belong in a commit message.
Not so sound flippant here,
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 01:38:38PM +0100, Pete Batard wrote:
> Improve RpiFirmwareGetSerial() to derive a serial number from the
> MAC address, in case the platform returns 0 for the serial number.
>
> Also fix a typo where "%s" was used instead of "%a".
I did not see a reply to my feedback on
Improve RpiFirmwareGetSerial() to derive a serial number from the
MAC address, in case the platform returns 0 for the serial number.
Also fix a typo where "%s" was used instead of "%a".
Signed-off-by: Pete Batard
---
Platform/RaspberryPi/RPi3/Drivers/RpiFirmwareDxe/RpiFirmwareDxe.c | 11
