On 2019-04-10 20:07, Rebecca Cran via Groups.Io wrote:
Thanks. I'm working on fixing it now: it looks like it needs new
compiler flags in BaseTools/Source/C/Makefiles/header.makefile, as
well as recognizing arm64 as a platform name in addition to aarch64
It didn't need any compiler flag chang
On 2019-04-10 18:09, Liming Gao wrote:
Yes. No test on FreeBSD. If possible, can you contribute the patch to fix this
issue on FreeBSD?
Thanks. I'm working on fixing it now: it looks like it needs new
compiler flags in BaseTools/Source/C/Makefiles/header.makefile, as well
as recognizing ar
groups.io; rebe...@bluestop.org
>Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Building EDK2 code on arm64 (aarch64) - BaseTools
>fails
>
>On 04/10/19 06:57, Rebecca Cran via Groups.Io wrote:
>> Is there any expectation that EDK2 will build on non-x86 systems?
>
>Yes. It should certainly build
On 04/10/19 06:57, Rebecca Cran via Groups.Io wrote:
> Is there any expectation that EDK2 will build on non-x86 systems?
Yes. It should certainly build on aarch64 (Linux at least).
>
> I tried building BaseTools (from git master,
> ae2fb9ead47b5abaf2a4e815b5f57c8f4838b221) using GCC 8.2 on a Sof
On 2019-04-10 08:41, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
This doesn't look like an architecture problem. It seems your GCC
version isn't checked correctly by BaseTools. This warning is supposed
to be disabled, see:
StdLib/LibC/Stdio/Stdio.inf: GCC:*_*_*_CC_FLAGS= -fno-builtin
-Wno-pointer-to-int
On 4/10/19 6:57 AM, Rebecca Cran via Groups.Io wrote:
> Is there any expectation that EDK2 will build on non-x86 systems?
I have no problem using Ubuntu Bionic on Aarch64 using the default GCC.
$ lsb_release -cd
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS
Codename: bionic
$ uname -ms
Linux aarch64
Is there any expectation that EDK2 will build on non-x86 systems?
I tried building BaseTools (from git master,
ae2fb9ead47b5abaf2a4e815b5f57c8f4838b221) using GCC 8.2 on a SoftIron
OverDrive 1000 (running FreeBSD) but there are lots of errors, such as:
gcc -c -I .. -I ../Include/Common -I
