I see this landed last week. Many thanks to everyone for their input and for
getting this landed.
Jonathan
On 05/08/2019 01:51, Gao, Zhichao wrote:
> Agree. I would prepare this patch for push.
>
> Thanks,
> Zhichao
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Carsey, Jaben
>> Sent: Saturday, Augus
It's been three months now since I contributed the patch. Could someone update
me on the progress on getting it landed?
On 11/06/2019 22:53, Jonathan Watt wrote:
> Since I haven't contributed before I'm not sure what the timeline for these
> things generally is. It's be
--
> From: Carsey, Jaben
> Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 5:00 PM
> To: Jonathan Watt ; devel@edk2.groups.io;
> tim.le...@insyde.com; Gao, Zhichao ; Ni, Ray
>
> Cc: Bi, Dandan
> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 1/1] ShellPkg/UefiShellBcfgCommandLib:
> Fix '-opt' o
the specification you refer to that was used to
> write the non-EDK2 implementations say about the -opt switch?
>
> Regards,
> Jim
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Tim Lewis
> Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 3:04 PM
> To: 'Jonathan W
rs. And it didn't
> cause us grief with our other product which does use an EDK2-derived shell.
>
> Best regards,
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Jonathan Watt
> Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 1:51 PM
> To: Tim Lewis ; &#
my company, that
> are implemented to the specification. Server platforms that use the
> "application" style boot options can regularly run over 10 options.
>
> I believe the better alternative is to add a new option in the specification
> and leave the existing syntax for -o
to happen.
On 07/05/2019 20:00, Jonathan Watt wrote:
> There is potential for that, but it's not certain. For it to happen scripts
> would need to be both omitting the "0x" prefix and be pass an option number
> greater than 9. The fact this very unexpected inconsistency (w
gt; Zhichao
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf
>>>> Of
>>> Ni,
>>>> Ray
>>>> Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 10:02 PM
>>>> To: jw...@jwatt.org; dev
From: Jonathan Watt
Fixes `bcfg boot -opt #` handling of the "#" option number to be
consistent with the other commands. Removes a footgun that bit me
and corrupted a different boot option than the one I meant to edit.
https://github.com/jwatt/edk2/tree/bcfg_args_fix
Jonath
From: Jonathan Watt
For all other bcfg commands the "#" (option number) argument(s) are
treated as hexedecimal values regardless of whether or not they are
prefixed by "0x". This change fixes '-opt' to handle its "#"
(option number) argument consistent
10 matches
Mail list logo
