The patched worked (it doesn't crash anymore) but the problem that it
doesn't find the DLR id is still there:
2002-01-02 11:01:41 [7] ERROR: Got DELIV REPORT but couldnt find message
or was not interested in it
A similar problems occurs when using CIMD2 (when receiving the delivery
report from
Hi there!
I am also having problems with dlrs under smpp.
I am geting this error when i ask for dlr:
2002-01-02 13:14:18 [8] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: sms received
2002-01-02 13:14:18 [5] PANIC: gwlib/octstr.c:2031: seems_valid_real:
Assertion `ostr != NULL' failed. (Called from
Greets!
I may suggest that those developers using and supporting SMPP should
provide a patch to integrate the multiple-receiver support?!
I have done something in smsbox.c to support mutiple-receiver when using
http post method that seems to work with EMI2 and SMPP... (diff attached)
For
for the sendsms HTTP interface?
Any if yes, which smsc?
I'm currently figuring out in the code where this is supported for the
GET method, but I can't find it. Any I remember that the user's guide
that's that multiple receivers are allowed seperated with a blank in
the to= argument.
Stipe
Stefan Cars wrote:
What do you meanwith multi-cast GET ?
the user guide states at
http://www.kannel.3glab.org/download/kannel-userguide-snapshot/userguide.html#AEN2521
that the to= argument may contain multiple receivers, but I can't
see any implementation of this is the code?!
I'm just
Yes, i'm using this. IT works with CIMD2 at least.
-
Stefan Cars
CTO
Globalwire Communications
Phone: +46 18 10 79 50
Mobile(UK): +44 788 061 36 69
Mobile(SE): +46 708 44 36 00
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Stefan Cars wrote:
What do you meanwith multi-cast GET ?
Yes, i'm using this. IT works with CIMD2 at least.
so where is the splitting and looping of the single receiver number of
the to GET variable implemented? In smsc_cimd2.c?
Is the code within the current cvs tree or have you an own version?
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone testing the load balancer ?
Cheers,
Hong Cheng
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
Choong Hong Cheng wrote:
Anyone testing the load balancer ?
not yet, but it's on my TODO list.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail:
Is it in the cvs tree ?
I cant seem to find it ?
the proposed patch has been send to the devel@ list, AFAIK.
Choong, can you please state which subject it was, or resend it.
Thanks.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 04:24:29PM +0100, Bernino Lind wrote:
Could you setup cvs to make a post-process rule on commit, that all
interested parties gets a mail that states the commit comment, the file
changed etc.
Look for the daily messages to the devel-reports list with the subject
Daily
Ah sh**, my fuckup. I had not seen that list...
Sorry for not looking deeply...
//nino
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 03:51:23PM +, David Holland wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 04:24:29PM +0100, Bernino Lind wrote:
Could you setup cvs to make a post-process rule on commit, that all
you have to subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
http://kannel.3glab.org/mailman/options/devel-reports/
Valter
- Original Message -
From: Bernino Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:24 PM
Subject: cvs mail post-process
Hello dev team,
A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I see it this approach with octstr_compare is a part of the Kannel's
protective coding style where the NULL pointers are not meant to be used
as any other similar pointer. So the assert prevents the NULL pointer to
go on loosely and stops it before it may cause a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I see it this approach with octstr_compare is a part of the Kannel's
protective coding style where the NULL pointers are not meant to be used
as any other similar pointer. So the assert prevents the NULL pointer to
go on loosely and stops it before it may
15 matches
Mail list logo
