Inspired by Jörgs repost of the orginal problem reported by:
Frederik Ammitzbøll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tue, 17 Jul 2001 12:07:02 +0200
Msg-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I did some in-deep investigations on this and here is a draft of the
current summary:
As Frederik pointed out there is a *huge*
Bjoern,
while re-reading this thread I think Andreas and I missed what you
meant in your question.
Which one is it:
a) You want to be able to use HTTP *and* HTTPS to *one* port (i.e.
443) for the sendsms HTTP interface.
b) You want to have *only* HTTPS for the sendsms HTTP interface, but
HTTP
Stipe Tolj wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Hi. Some of our kannel-servers access both SMSCs and gsm modems. For each
> > of these, a bit of unified-prefix trickery is needed. However, they don't
> > need the same rules ! But there is only one unified-prefix setting in the
> > core gr
Lucio Ferrao wrote:
>
> I have tested succesfully the patch for the specific problems with AT2.
> The code looks good too.
>
> My vote to commit.
Ok, I'm going to commit this today.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
M
I have tested succesfully the patch for the specific problems with AT2.
The code looks good too.
My vote to commit.
Lucio Ferrao
OutSystems
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stipe Tolj
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 23:11
To: Kannel-deve
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
>
> I am running with --disable-ssl, so ssl code is not the problem.
*puh*
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [
David Holland wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 05:43:34PM -, Paul Keogh wrote:
> > > Are there going to be any of us at 3GSM World Congress, 19-22.
> > We (ANAM) will be there on the Enterprise Ireland stand. Drop
> > by and say hello !
>
> 3G Lab will have a stand... and a yacht.
great,
Andreas Fink wrote:
>
> >Hello everybody,
> >
> >yesterday i've configured SSL for the SMS Box. It's running very
> >fine with a Self-Signed Certificate, but we don't have only HTTPS
> >Webserver:-)
> >
> >Because, now it isn't possible to receive a normal HTTP request, it
> >is only possible
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
>
> I just added OTA compiler (for compiling XML settings and bookmarks
> documents)
> to CVS. Settings part is tested with T39m and 6210, bookmarks with 6210.
> Well
> bookmarks are tested with T39m, they just do not work ;)
thanks. Have you considered to add the SyncML (co
Jörg Pommnitz wrote:
>
> > What's the
> > easiest way to compile the on my Win NT4-machine with VS6.0?
>
> I don't think there is an easy way for VS6.0. You will want to try
> cygwin (see http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/).
I agree and even strength this up to you HAVE TO use Cygwin 1.3.6-6 o
> What's the
> easiest way to compile the on my Win NT4-machine with VS6.0?
I don't think there is an easy way for VS6.0. You will want to try
cygwin (see http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/).
Regards
Jörg
Condat will be there with 2 stands. To quote David Holland's
sentiment:
"How come I never get to go on fun trips like this? :-)"
Regards
Jörg
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2002 18:19
> An: [EMAIL PRO
> can you point that workaround more out, please? I have not found
> anything on the list itself.
This is from Frederik Ammitzbøll:
--
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Frederik Ammitzbøll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Thanks Andreas,
> Hmm. well if you use port 443, its HTTPS, if you use port 80 or any
other its HTTP.
Yes, sure.
>The cludge is that you can not specify two ports in smsbox.
>However you could use two smsboxes with two config files talking to one
bearerbox.
ok. but it is a little bit compli
>Hello everybody,
>
>yesterday i've configured SSL for the SMS Box. It's running very
>fine with a Self-Signed Certificate, but we don't have only HTTPS
>Webserver:-)
>
>Because, now it isn't possible to receive a normal HTTP request, it
>is only possible to receive a HTTPS request. Any ide
Stipe Tolj wrote:
>
> Aarno Syvänen wrote:
>
> > Using wapbox only for pushing (fetching is done by operator's gateway)
> > seems to
> > cause an idle loop, one thread (poll thread) taking up to 40 % of CPU
> > time.
> >
> > I hope that this does not happen when wapbox is used for fetching (I
>
Hello everybody,
yesterday i've configured SSL for the SMS Box. It's running very fine with a
Self-Signed Certificate, but we don't have only HTTPS Webserver:-)
Because, now it isn't possible to receive a normal HTTP request, it is only
possible to receive a HTTPS request. Any idea ??Is i
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 05:43:34PM -, Paul Keogh wrote:
> > Are there going to be any of us at 3GSM World Congress, 19-22.
> We (ANAM) will be there on the Enterprise Ireland stand. Drop
> by and say hello !
3G Lab will have a stand... and a yacht.
How come I never get to go on fun trips li
Hi List,
I just added OTA compiler (for compiling XML settings and bookmarks
documents)
to CVS. Settings part is tested with T39m and 6210, bookmarks with 6210.
Well
bookmarks are tested with T39m, they just do not work ;)
It would be nice to have test reports. I would like to is this
for-Nokia-
>Does connectionless mode work ?
>I would like a dump too, and can you add msg_dump(msg, 0) to
>write_to_bearerbox
>and read_from_bearerbox function in the file gw/shared.c (after calls
>msg_pack
>and msg_unpack).
So I have to download some sources
(http://www.kannel.3glab.org/download/kannel-sna
Stipe Tolj wrote:
>
> Marc schrieb:
> >
> > Yes, I can, but please remember that it even does not work when I replace
> > the function call of 'doConversions()' with a simple while-do-nothing-loop!
> > So the servlet just does nothing, it waits, then it returns the requested
> > wml-content witho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi. Some of our kannel-servers access both SMSCs and gsm modems. For each
> of these, a bit of unified-prefix trickery is needed. However, they don't
> need the same rules ! But there is only one unified-prefix setting in the
> core group?
> (thus, they conflict).
>
Hi. Some of our kannel-servers access both SMSCs and gsm modems. For each
of these, a bit of unified-prefix trickery is needed. However, they don't
need the same rules ! But there is only one unified-prefix setting in the
core group?
(thus, they conflict).
1) Isn't this a problem?
2) don't som
23 matches
Mail list logo
