I've commited a patch that adds a reply configuration variable (boolean)
to emi2 and at2.
I've tested it with an test account and I won't be able to put it in
production
machines for a week or two
BTW... What is a +1 in STATUS
* smsc_emi2.c does not try to re-connect if the initial login att
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 11:00 PM
Subject: SMPP causing smsbox to crash?
> When kannel GETS this message looped back to itself, it freaks out and
crashes.
>
> I sent the original message (to the smsc) with
> F
Well, I was just analizing the SMPP protocol and checking the speed.
Trust me, Kannel supports SMPP v 3.3 very well, I guess better than Sim runs
the emulations even :)
Afaik The SMPPSim does save the messages in some log file, and u can parse
it if you need those ..
I was running Kannel as SMPP E
I set up smppsim, and im just trying to test that kannel works with SMPP. I
grabbed SMPPSim and I just want to verify that sending to smppsim works, and
having smppsim send back works. (smppsim is also not storing the messages it
recieved in its log file either)
What configuration were you usi
What is it exactly that you are trying to do so far ? :)
I have used the Kannel with SMPPSim, and it was working quite fine for me ..
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 3:00 PM
Subject: SMPP causing smsbox to crash?
> H
Hey guys, I've set up SMPPSim, and ive created the proper entries in my
kannel.conf to use it as an smsc to connect to, and all is well. it connects
and the whole 9 yards. When i send a message to it, it accepts it, and loops it
back to kannel.
So far we're okay.
When kannel GETS this messag
Hey guys,
I need to do some SMPP testing simulations on Kannel CVS. What simulators do
you guys use? I used smppsim, and as far as I can tell, I can send an sms to
it, but do you guys know how to get it to send msgs to kannel?
thanks =)
The RSA patent expired in 2000. The algorithm is
in the public domain now (RSA Inc. released it into the
public domain a few weeks before the patent expired).
See: http://www.rsasecurity.com/news/pr/000906-1.html
However the RC5 algorithm is still patented.
Regards
Jörg
-Original Message
-Original Message-
From: Bjoern Buettner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 February 2002 15:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: Kannel & Cookies
Thanks for your fast help Ian,
To Stefan,
That's the way, isn't it!!! :-)
Answer complete ? Any question ?
Bjoern
kind regards
Vodafone
> Which device saves the cookies ?
> A celluar phone cannot save the cookies, isn't it?
> Does Kannel save the cookies local?
> Is it possible to configure Kannel so that Kannel can handle cookies?
They're kept at the gateway. Kannel will keep session cookies only (i.e. not
persistent), but it do
Hi guys,
General question.
Which device saves the cookies ?
A celluar phone cannot save the cookies, isn't it?
Does Kannel save the cookies local?
Is it possible to configure Kannel so that Kannel can handle cookies?
We want provide a WAP service with cookies.
Has anyone used a W@P server with
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Alexei Pashkovsky wrote:
> >
> > I think idea of having the listening http interface inside bearerbox instead
> > of running two executables could be usefull too.
> > Obviously this should be configurable ..
>
> that's not how Lars designed it.
No, but he
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Perhaps you can help yourself ? Wml_definitions.h attributes and their
> > token
> > representation. You can add new ones here, and perhaps provide the patch
> >to the
> > list.
>
> i already tried this but it did not work since I dont know the exact syntax
> of th
Seems like there is some interest in sms service types as loadable modules
so I'm submitting my implementation.
Also included are two sample modules. They are very simple and lack proper
logging and error handling.
As has been mentioned, the loadable module interface has to be carefully
designed
Stipe Tolj wrote:
>
> Alexei Pashkovsky wrote:
> >
> > I think idea of having the listening http interface inside bearerbox instead
> > of running two executables could be usefull too.
> > Obviously this should be configurable ..
>
> that's not how Lars designed it.
>
> SO I guess this leeds up
Im currently using version 1.0.3 stable on a RedHat
7.0 (It's going on a Debian when I get the time).
The modem is a Wavecom WM02 GSM Modem connected via
serial, eg. the SMSC is AT with modemtype=wavecom.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Troels Aagaar
You should tell us which version are you using, and
which smsc.
I think you are using an old at,
use at2 from current cvs.
Andrea
>
> Da: "Troels Aagaard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Data: 22/02/2002 11:12
> A: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Oggetto: Problems with cell smsc
>
> Im using a Wavecom GSM modem fo
Alexei Pashkovsky wrote:
>
> I think idea of having the listening http interface inside bearerbox instead
> of running two executables could be usefull too.
> Obviously this should be configurable ..
that's not how Lars designed it.
SO I guess this leeds up here to a religious battle, I wouldn'
> Perhaps you can help yourself ? Wml_definitions.h attributes and their
> token
> representation. You can add new ones here, and perhaps provide the patch
>to the
> list.
i already tried this but it did not work since I dont know the exact syntax
of the parameters.
best regards
- Rainer
Hi Rainer,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I found a bug in kannel (up to 1.1.5) with WML1.2 code which contains
> accesskeys
Kannel supports WML1.1, not WML1.2
>
> the following code:
>
> Link
>
> will be sent as:
>
> Link
>
> can anybody help me here or provide me a patch?
Per
Im using a Wavecom GSM modem for my kannel gateway.
When recieving multiple messages at once, kannel only loads message 1 and the
other(s) are lost (deleted). Is there a solution for
this?
Sema have an SMPP gateway to their SMSC. The version of the SMPP
the gateway uses depends on what is sent in the bind request. If the
version uses 3.3 then it will send the message body in the short message
field, if it is 3.4 then it uses the optional parameter message_payload
field. This is SMPP
That might be interesting to see the scripts. I'm going to try to dump
the smpp pdus, see what I get.
But it appears the concatenate is basically the problem. Also I notice
that the coding flags set for pdu when their is a udh header seem to be
more than what's needed (according to SMPP3.4 spec).
Hi all
I found a bug in kannel (up to 1.1.5) with WML1.2 code which contains
accesskeys
the following code:
Link
will be sent as:
Link
can anybody help me here or provide me a patch?
thanks
24 matches
Mail list logo
