EMI: Not enough resources available

Hi, i've connecting to smsc using emi2, and i have this error message for one of my LA, fyi, i have 2 LAs (UCP60), one is okay and doesn't gimme this message, but the second provides me with the following messages. free-core-log.log:2002-03-25 09:23:37 [6] DEBUG: EMI2[10.122.25.88:5115]: emi2

Rif: RE: speed (smsc_at2.c)

I think that at2 should autodetect speed if it doesn't find any speed setting, in the smsc group or modems.conf, or if the smsc speed setting is set to 0 regardless of the modems.conf setting, or the modems.conf setting is set to 0 - isn't that the case now ? No. Now you must set speed=0 if

Re: speed (smsc_at2.c)

Bruno David Rodrigues wrote: If we choose the modem, should kannel autodetect the speed or try to autodetect? Andrea wants to kannel always autodetect speed unless it's explicity set in smsc group I chosed to have a known working speed in modems.conf and use it, and only force

Re: Rif: RE: speed (smsc_at2.c)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that at2 should autodetect speed if it doesn't find any speed setting, in the smsc group or modems.conf, or if the smsc speed setting is set to 0 regardless of the modems.conf setting, or the modems.conf setting is set to 0 - isn't that the case now ?

AT2 driver and 6210

Hi List, has someone tested current CVS with 6210 ? Does general configuration for Nokia phones work with this phone ? Aarno

Re: Major showstopper almost solved (or quick patch)

I just tried to reproduce this, but without success. Which means all requests send throu the keep-alive connection to the apache I used (with keep-alive timeout set to 60 sec.) got back to the phone. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

[BUG] in cfg_dump() after fixing the multiple include bug

Bruno, now we have another thing breaking in cfg_dump(), please build the cvs tree and try to start the wapkannel.conf for the wapbox and you'll probably get: 2002-03-27 10:59:29 [0] DEBUG: Dumping Cfg 0x100ce580 2002-03-27 10:59:29 [0] ERROR: Start marker was damaged for area 0x100ce5b0

[ANN] Rolling the tarball for 1.1.6

Anyone having contraints about rolling the tarball for the 1.1.6 release in a couple of minutes? Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail:

Re: [ANN] Rolling the tarball for 1.1.6

ok for me. Do please later tell us how to use the cvs. Are we going to have a HEAD/CVS branch and 1.1.6 branch ? is it just cvs -r 1.1.6 co for 1.1.6 and usual cvs co for cvs/head ? - Original Message - From: Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March

Re: Rif: RE: speed (smsc_at2.c)

But that's why there is a speed in modems.conf. That's why Siemens M20 have a 19200, because *every* works at 19200 and not at 9600. But the problem is that *every*. There's equal modems at one speed and others at other speed (wavecom). That's why there is a speed in smsc group, to force a

Re: Rif: RE: speed (smsc_at2.c)

+1 for me :-) Andrea - Original Message - From: Bruno David Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Oded Arbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:20 PM Subject: Re: Rif: RE: speed (smsc_at2.c) But that's