[PATCH] http server bind to interface

Hi All a small patch to the http code to allow the http server to bin to a specified interface. Nisan --- cvs/gateway/gwlib/http.cSun Nov 17 11:46:30 2002 +++ gateway-work/gwlib/http.c Sun Nov 17 11:45:51 2002 @@ -1922,7 +1922,7 @@ } -int http_open_port(int port, int ssl) +int

Re: [PATCH] avoid bearerbox oom-kill (fix)

Hi Alexander, ok, I tried to understand the patch. Here is what I sum up: Within gw/bb_boxc.c:boxc_receiver() you create a msg of type ack and fill it with values depending on the result of the smsc2_rout() call. ok so far ok. Then you inject the ack msg to conn-incoming. But I don't see any

Re: [PATCH] avoid bearerbox oom-kill (fix)

Hi Stipe, On Sunday 17 November 2002 15:05, you wrote: Hi Alexander, ok, I tried to understand the patch. Here is what I sum up: Within gw/bb_boxc.c:boxc_receiver() you create a msg of type ack and fill it with values depending on the result of the smsc2_rout() call. ok so far ok. you are

CVS SMPP Optional parameters

Hi Stipe I see that your implementation of optional parameters in SMPP is not quite complete. The PDU code is done, but I dont see you using it as such in the SMPP module, well at least in the CVS version. Do you have a more recent version of smsc_smpp that does use your mods? Nisan

[PATCH] was Re: SMPP: data_coding (deliver_sm)

Hi any reason why this didnt make it to the cvs? Also why not apply it to the data_coding in submit_sm? nisan At 08:42 PM 11/6/02 +1300, Alan McNatty wrote: Here's Oded's patch against current cvs. Is working fine for me ... On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 11:21, Alan McNatty wrote: In progress - am

Re: [PATCH] was Re: SMPP: data_coding (deliver_sm)

Hi Nisan, I guess waiting for confirmation from others that all is good. Good idea to apply same approach to submit_sm, will have a look at that. Cheers, Alan On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 10:14, Nisan Bloch wrote: Hi any reason why this didnt make it to the cvs? Also why not apply it to the

Re: problem with cvs-20021114

--- Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:56:10 +0100 From: Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ignat Vassilev [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: kannel devel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: problem with cvs-20021114 Can you some body give me a point how will look group =

Re: CVS SMPP Optional parameters

Hi Nisan, Nisan Bloch wrote: Hi Stipe I see that your implementation of optional parameters in SMPP is not quite complete. The PDU code is done, but I dont see you using it as such in the SMPP module, well at least in the CVS version. Do you have a more recent version of smsc_smpp that

Re: problem with cvs-20021114

ups, ok, I missed to add 'field-boxc-id' to the 'dlr-db' group in gwlib/cfg.def. Fixing this right now in cvs. Please update your tree and try again, should work now without the panic. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG

Re: problem with cvs-20021114

Stipe Tolj wrote: ups, ok, I missed to add 'field-boxc-id' to the 'dlr-db' group in gwlib/cfg.def. Fixing this right now in cvs. Please update your tree and try again, should work now without the panic. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED]