Re: Question on wap_push_ppg_user.c/prefix_allowed ()

2002-05-16 Thread Aarno Syvänen
I will remove it. Aarno - Original Message - From: "Paul Keogh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kannel Development List (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:02 PM Subject: Question on wap_push_ppg_user.c/prefix_allowed () This function includes the code; sure = o

Re: Isolating the WSP API

2002-05-13 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi Jimmy, Kannel wap library interface is located in wap directory, in module wap.h. It is used (upwards) in gw/wap-appl.c and gw/wap_push_ota.c (downwards) in gw/wapbox.c. These modules show how a wsp event is constructed, too. You send an event to a layer with dispatch functions. Events corres

Re: smsc_smpp.c - reconnection/enquiry timings

2002-05-13 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Can you use configuration variables instead ? Aarno - Original Message - From: "Alan McNatty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kannel Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 7:58 AM Subject: smsc_smpp.c - reconnection/enquiry timings > Hello, > > Our local friendly telco who alow

Re: USSD Center

2002-05-07 Thread Aarno Syvänen
- Original Message - From: "Shridhar Raju" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kannel Developers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:25 PM Subject: Re: USSD Center - Original Message - From: "Aarno Syvänen" <[EMAIL PROT

Wiral closing the developing shop for some time, at least.

2002-05-07 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi List,   Wiral ceases all development,  this includes Kannel code. (effective tomorrow). I hope that I can continue Kannel work with another firm. In all cases, all job offers are again very wellcome. Please, use my private email address:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Aarno    PS. However, Wiral wi

Re: USSD Center

2002-05-06 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, see answers between the lines aarno - Original Message - From: "Shridhar Raju" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kannel Developers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 8:21 AM Subject: USSD Center > Hi, > > I have applied USSDC patch for CIMD2 protocol given to me by Aarno. I used

Re: Question on wap_push_pap_mime.c- Extension Headers

2002-05-02 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Paul Keogh wrote: > > This module contains the pass_extension_headers() function, the purpose > of which is to valid the structure of extension headers in the Push message. > However, the function contains the line of code - > > if ((octstr_case_search(*body_part, octstr_imm("Content"),

Re: Bug in wap_push_ppg.c ?

2002-05-02 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Yeah. Thanks. Aarno Paul Keogh wrote: > > The function send_to_pi () takes a first argument of HTTPClient *c. > This is passed directly to http_send_reply (c...). If the c is NULL > http_send_reply () crashes as it immediately deferences c. > > I don't think send_to_pi () should assume that th

Re: Compilation Warnings

2002-04-30 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Bruno David Simões Rodrigues wrote: > > bruno@laptop:~/work/gateway$ make -s > wap/wsp_session.c:437: warning: `REFERER' redefined > wap/wsp.h:47: warning: this is the location of the previous definition > wap/wsp_session.c:490: warning: `REFERER' redefined > wap/wsp_session.c:437: warning: this

Re: Issue with CO Push

2002-04-29 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, Michael Mulcahy wrote: > To support connection oriented push, Kannel appears to require the > Push Initiator to specify the application identifier as "push.sia". > > I think this is incorrect, I think Kannel should be able to accept > any application identifier for connection oriented push

Re: USSD Center

2002-04-26 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, - Original Message - From: "Shridhar Raju" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kannel Developers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:21 AM Subject: USSD Center > Hi, > > Does kannel sms gateway connect to ussd center like Nokia Artus USSD Center > (CIMD). If yes, does it requir

Re: Bug in wap_push_ppg.c ?

2002-04-25 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Paul is right, of course. Aarno - Original Message - From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Kannel Development List (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Aarno Syvänen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 4:24 PM Subject:

Re: Fw: Kannel version 1.1.5-1 fault tolerance and memory leaks

2002-04-25 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi James, >From: "James Wang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Fw: Kannel version 1.1.5-1 fault tolerance and memory leaks >Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:29:26 +0100 > > >- Original Message - >From: "James Wang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sir/Madam, >

Re: Push with M20 (fix)

2002-04-24 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi Stipe, Stipe Tolj wrote: > The 8-bit coding issue may be responsible for our problems PPGing > MMS.notification messages to MMS clients, hmmm, interesting. This may indeed be so. MMS clients must tell binary content from textual one, and so use dcs field. > yep the T68 does request SAR and

Re: smsbox panic when receiving garbadge in to field!

2002-04-24 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, you, of course, use native malloc ? Stefan Cars wrote: > When a stupid customer of ours is trying to send via the sendsms interface > and formatting the to field wrong after a short while the smsbox panics > becuase of "too many concurrent allocations". I've been trying to locate > the prob

Re: [RFC] status for wapbox internals

2002-04-24 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, Stipe Tolj wrote: > we'd like to have the option to have more information about wapbox's > current operational status, i.e. how many WSP machines are active and > how many client IPs are connected to the wapbox. > > Unfortunatly we can't get that information into bearerbox's status > report

Re: Push with M20 (fix)

2002-04-24 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Paul Keogh wrote: > > My push test set-up is > > test_ppg -> wapbox -> bearerbox -> m20t -> t68 > > This won't work with the current wapbox.c module > > I had to change > > msg->sms.coding = DC_UCS2; > > to > > msg->sms.coding = DC_8BIT; > > in pack_sms_datagram() in wapbox.c > >

Re: [RFC] Conffiguration variable for setting maximum incomingmessages queue length

2002-04-22 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi Nisan, Nisan Bloch wrote: > > Hi Aarno > At 04:52 PM 4/19/02 +0300, Aarno Syvänen wrote: > >Hi List, > > > >There have been some high stress Kannel tests (continous 350 msg/s, peak > >560 > >msg/s) here at Wiral. Kannel will crash, because incoming me

Re: SMS PDU for OTA-WSP connectionless Wap Push

2002-04-22 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Anarchy wrote: > > --- Aarno Syvänen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > WSP Push Pdu > > > 00 - app id? > > > 06 - push > > > 0D - header length? > > > AE 92 04 3C 21 A5 6E 84 81 B4 80 AF 80 - no idea about the rest > > > > Is

Re: Change standard WAP-ports?

2002-04-22 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Gerrit Einhoff wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 21. April 2002 22:37 schrieben Sie: > > They are hardcoded in Kannel AND IN THE PHONES. > > So it probably wont help you at all changing the hardcoded values. > > No, that's not correct. At least with Siemens phones (I have a S45 here) you > can actually cha

Re: Is libxml2 invoked whenever Kannel fetches a XML file

2002-04-22 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, > I am summarizing the actions once more here: > > 1) RENAMED hello.wml TO hello.xml FILE. BUT text/html > > 2) COPIED SAMPLE libxml2 (WAP-GENERATING) XML FILE >TO APACHE DOCUMENTROOT STILL text/html > > 3) CONFIGURED XML ENGINE COCOON WITH APACHE. IN >SAMPLE COCOON XML FILE REPLAC

[RFC] Conffiguration variable for setting maximum incoming messages queue length

2002-04-19 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi List, There have been some high stress Kannel tests (continous 350 msg/s, peak 560 msg/s) here at Wiral. Kannel will crash, because incoming messages queue will grow without any limits (currently it has 13000 msg and is growing), and take rest of system with it. So I think we need a upper

Re: SMS PDU for OTA-WSP connectionless Wap Push

2002-04-19 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Anarchy wrote: > > i've figured out how to tokenise the SI but the encoding of the WSP headers > still eludes me what do the numbers mean? > > WSP Push Pdu > 00 - app id? > 06 - push > 0D - header length? > AE 92 04 3C 21 A5 6E 84 81 B4 80 AF 80 - no idea about the rest Is this a working to

Re: WAP Push over SMS

2002-04-19 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, Anarchy wrote: > need some info desperately... how do u translate the PAP/SI data into an 8-bit > SMS? i'm writing a program (in java, if possible) to form a push message from > some input parameters, w/o going thru test_ppg... > > more specifically, i need to know which attribute maps to w

Re: running ppg by default?

2002-04-17 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Hi list, > > I'd like to discuss if we should allow a default PPG HTTP instance > running on port 8080 if no PPG group is defined, which is the way it > currently works. > > For security reasons I'd like to switch that off, if no PPG group is > defined. Votes? Yeah, it is

Re: [RFC] implementing XML-SMS calls using libxml2 functions

2002-04-16 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'd like to hear votes for rolling current cvs tree back, espacially > the parts Bruno added for the XML-SMS support using the > octstr_append() implementation. > > We should do this with libxml2 functions. At least I would like to > strip things out again

Re: PPG and cimd2

2002-04-15 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote: > > Aarno SyvÄnen wrote: > > > > Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote: > > > > > > Hi. > > > I am testing PPG. I define SMSC as CIMD2 and try to send SI to phone. I use > > > test_ppg program with my own pap and si files.

Re: Memory leak in wap_push_ppg_pushuser_list_add() ?

2002-04-12 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Paul Keogh wrote: > > I think the line > > next_try = dict_create(number_of_pushes, NULL); > > should be replaced with > > next_try = dict_create(number_of_pushes, octstr_destroy_item); > > as otherwise the memory management for the next_try Dict is incomplete > and results in a memor

Re: PPG and cimd2

2002-04-12 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote: > > Hi. > I am testing PPG. I define SMSC as CIMD2 and try to send SI to phone. I use > test_ppg program with my own pap and si files. Files are compiled normally, > but when bearerbox sends it to smsc through smsc_cimd2 driver it reports about > error: > > > cim

Re: [FYI] smpp my-number and post-xml

2002-04-10 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Stipe Tolj wrote: > > > > I've added preliminary support to XML Post to smsbox. > > > I'm building the xml with octstr_append (this issue I guess it's > > > almost ok) but I'm processing the incoming xml with > > > octstr_search and octstr_copy :P > > > There's still some variables missing and al

Re: kannel and MMS

2002-04-09 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Cristina Palomo wrote: > > Hi people, > Do you know if the kannel supports the MMS protocol for communicating with a > MMSC center? or how can the kannel communicate with a MMSC? No to both count. These means essentially does Kannel implement MMS proxy-relay (for speaking with MMSC) and does Kan

Re: 1.1.6 Instllation

2002-04-09 Thread Aarno Syvänen
charles wrote: > > Hi all , I am having problems in installing Kannel 1.1.6. Several files not > found while compiling ota.c . Anyone can help or provide me with RPM ? Did you do make distclean ? This empties config caches. Aarno

Re: [RC] XML-RPC implementation

2002-04-08 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Stipe Tolj wrote: > > I'm working on the XML-RPC files of Kannel and wonder how we are going > to utilize the protocoll in Kannel's boxes and the single method > calls. > > Basically there are two way: > > * adding XMP-RPC related URIs to existing HTTP servers and route the > request ot XML-R

Re: PPG doc review

2002-04-08 Thread Aarno Syvänen
> LOESCH Jean-Jacques wrote: > > > > Hi the list, > > > > I'm sorry it's a question that Jason has already asked in this mailing > list but I think the answer or From: Aarno Syvänen wasn't very clear. > > It might point that the doc rega

Re: Question on sending push messages to Nokia Toolkit

2002-04-03 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Stipe Tolj wrote: > Aarno, I not aware if we currently have any smsc-id routing in PPG > module?! I don't think so. So messages get routed randomly or to the > first available smsc? Yes, you are rigth. This is another misfeature. I try find time to add routing. Aarno

Re: Question on sending push messages to Nokia Toolkit

2002-04-03 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Andrejus Chaliapinas wrote: > > Ok guys, after checking wap_push_pap_compiler.c source, I've found that you need >IPv4 as > part of client address and not IPV4 as it's written in v1.1.6 developer's docs >chapter > 'Using Nokia Toolkit as a part of a developing environment'. I think this is at

Re: [BUG] list implementation too slow.

2002-03-28 Thread Aarno Syvänen
> Kalle Marjola wrote: > > > > On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Oded Arbel wrote: > > > > > I think this problem occurs as the bearerbox can't send messages as fast > > > as they are delivered (probably due to a large burst and then sustained > > > high load). I see messages queued on the module's queue, an

Re: Major showstopper almost solved (or quick patch)

2002-03-28 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi Bruno, > Bruno David Rodrigues wrote: > > The problem I and the other guy reported is (once again) related with > http keepalive. > > I've just disabled the #if at line 904 from http.c and everything > works ok now. > > We should disable it again until we can fix for real the > http-keepali

AT2 driver and 6210

2002-03-27 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi List, has someone tested current CVS with 6210 ? Does general configuration for Nokia phones work with this phone ? Aarno

Re: WAP over SMS?

2002-03-26 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi Hans, "Hanz Hager (ESF)" wrote: > > Hi! > > Even though it is expensive to WAP over SMS, there is one good reason for doing so. > It might be a long shot, but still a little bit interesting for some special >applications. > > When you talk on the phone you can not simultaneously have a CSD

Re: MMS status.

2002-03-25 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Stefan Cars wrote: > > > > What is the status of kannel's MMS ? WAP 1.2 , SAR, WSP multipart etc. ?? > > Aarno and I have been discussing about MMS proxy things for Kannel. > > Basicly we have to change some slightly things in the PPG part to use > Kannel as PPG (SMS beare

Re: AW: MMS status.

2002-03-25 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Jörg Pommnitz wrote: > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > We'd needs someone familiar with SAR for IP to implement this > > in WTP. > > Is this SAR as in "Segmentation and Reassembly"? Yep. Aarno

Re: [BUG] list implementation too slow.

2002-03-21 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi Oded & Andreas, Oded Arbel wrote: > > Hmm. yes - I do compile using checking malloc. I re-comiled using native > malloc and it looks better - haven't had all the capacity testing done > on it yet though. Is it just that - checking malloc is so slow to cause > thrashing in code that do de-allo

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia

2002-03-21 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Bjoern Buettner wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > I've send a XML OTA mesg. to an Erricson Mobile, this phone does not receive > any SMS, too. I guess that's a problem with my SMSC Siemens Tc35 GSM Modem, > perhaps!!?? > Can it be true?? > > I cannot seen any other problem. > > Bjoern What is your exa

Re: [BUG] list implementation too slow.

2002-03-21 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, Hi, Kalle Marjola wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Oded Arbel wrote: > > > I think this problem occurs as the bearerbox can't send messages as fast > > as they are delivered (probably due to a large burst and then sustained > > high load). I see messages queued on the module's queue, and th

Re: AW: AW: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia

2002-03-21 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, Bjoern Buettner wrote: > > General question: > is the example "OTA settings XML document" usable for Nokia. > I've tried to configure a Nokia phone which should be supported, but the > phone does not recieve any SMS and I don't why?? (It was the rigth phone > number) :-)) I just tested 6210

Re: [RFC] feature freeze?!

2002-03-21 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Andreas Fink wrote: > > > > >Hi there, > > > > > >when are we going to feature freeze the cvs tree? > > > > > >What patches are still open? I see a couple of submissions to the > > >devel@ list but yet to change in the STATUS file. Please heads up for > > >anyone of the deve

Re: [BUG] list implementation too slow.

2002-03-21 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi Oded & List Oded Arbel wrote: > > Hi list. > > Lately we've been doing some very high capacity testing on Kannel , and > found out some interesting stuff. mainly as queues (managed by lists) > are filling up to over a few hundreds of messages, the boxes start > thrashing. > I think this is d

Re: AW: AW: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia

2002-03-20 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Bjoern Buettner wrote: > > Aarno Syvänen wrote: > > So Kannel > > must accept whole URL encoded XML document, enabling ota service user > > (the client) > > to change configuration at will. > ACK ! > > but, > > now I'm much more confused.:-) &

Re: AW: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia

2002-03-19 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Bjoern Buettner wrote: > > Thanx Arno, > > > (XML document is local to the client, not to the Kannel, is it not?) > BTW, what does it mean? > Which client do u mean? > > No offence ! No offence taken. I meant that it is pointless to the store XML documents in the Kannel machine. (For this kind

Re: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia

2002-03-19 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Bjoern Buettner wrote: > > Thanx, > > but I've some problems using XML4OTA > > This is my understanding of the Kannel Doc. > http://mysmsgw:13013/cgi-bin/sendota?username=ota&password=ota1&phonenumber= > 1234567&text=/usr/local/kannel-20020228/test.xml&type=settings > > Is this correct?? > >

Re: WAP over SMS?

2002-03-19 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi Zhiu Zhou Ye wrote: > > Then what's the reason of supporting the push mode of the operation at all if the >pull is not? I mean, we can simply send a straight SMS message, rather than a >WAPPush message right? Given that the user can act on the message anyway? WAP Push supporting phones a

Re: WAP over SMS?

2002-03-18 Thread Aarno Syvänen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > hello all > i know you all don't like repeat questions so if the answer to my question > is avaliable please point me there.. > 1) does kannel support WAP over SMS? > 2) how is it configured? I presume you mean pull mode of operation ? Kannel does not support it, nei

Re: Ups...Format error in my last mail

2002-03-15 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Bjoern Buettner wrote: > > Hi list, > > I'think, I have a format problem in my last mail. > > I've got a "3D" sign in the mail I've received from the list. > > STRANGE ! Do not worry. I hold similar opinions about DTDs. Aarno

Re: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia

2002-03-15 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Bjoern Buettner wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Today I've re-configured my OTA settings in Kannel CVS Version from > 2002/02/28. > I've used the standard example in Kannel. (kannel config: ota-setting) > > It's strange, but Nokia phones does not receive anything, yet!? > Siemens receives a SMS but it

Re: [RFI] UDH in MO messages

2002-03-14 Thread Aarno Syvänen
rated, or if cimd2 have a udhi > indicator ? It is separated (a separate parameter, with id 032), and there are no udhi, either. See attached file. Aarno > > - Original Message - > From: "Aarno Syvänen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Bruno David Rodr

Re: Encoding in Kannel (was: charset question (Greek))

2002-03-13 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Oded Arbel wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andreas Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 11:23 AM > > To: Oded Arbel > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: charset question (Greek) > > > >1. Using what character set do messages arive to > > sms

Re: usage of smsc_http.c

2002-03-12 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi Rajesh, Rajesh Venkateshvaralu wrote: > > hi > i am new to kannel > can anyone tell me how do i connect to an SMSC through HTTP interface? > i went through smsc_http.c .is this used exactly for this purpose? HTTP interface is for relaying requests to another SendSMSService. I fear that e

Re: charset question (Greek)

2002-03-12 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Because SMS with unicode contains only 70 characters. (That is why I do not like Unicode, at least.) Andreas, is coding of greek chars with GSM default alphabet standardised any way ? aarno Oded Arbel wrote: > > Haven't got a good answer, but another question : > why don't you want to use unic

Re: [RFI] UDH in MO messages

2002-03-11 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi Bruno, we can test this with CIMD2, if you send the patch. Aarno > Bruno David Rodrigues wrote: > > Can anyone send me a UCP example string of a long text message and a > picture message so > I can see if my smsc is broken or if we're gonna have a problem with > MO udh interpretation... >

Kannel supporting greek SMs?

2002-03-08 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi List, Have someone experiences withSMs using greek character set ? GSM default alphabet certainly does not contain may greek letters :( aarno

Re: [RFI] octstr_recode

2002-03-07 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi Bruno, Bruno David Rodrigues wrote: > > %c is the sms.coding variable, so if smsc_* code is using the dcs_to_fields, > it must have the right value > > (yes, coding=2 and charset=binary <- what should I use here ? ) And binary message would be forwarded to the sms-service as it is, without

Re: Access MMSC from Internet

2002-03-07 Thread Aarno Syvänen
And protocols are SMTP and IMAP (you can use POP, if you must). aarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Nokia just released this: >http://www.forum.nokia.com/smsforum/main/1,35452,1_2_7_4,00.html (requires >registration). > It's basically a Java API to access a Nokia MMSC, and an emulator. > > -

Re: [RFI] octstr_recode

2002-03-06 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, Andreas Fink wrote: > > > > What I am missing besides that is incoming support for UDH so we can > >> receive incoming a ringtone or similar. So a %u could be used (if > >> thats not taken). > > > >Incoming udh will have to wait until we have incoming concatenation > >I'm now thinking abo

Re: [RFI] octstr_recode

2002-03-06 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Andreas Fink wrote: > > > > What I am missing besides that is incoming support for UDH so we can > >> receive incoming a ringtone or similar. So a %u could be used (if > >> thats not taken). > > > >Incoming udh will have to wait until we have incoming concatenation > >I'm now thinking about a

Re: [RFI] octstr_recode

2002-03-06 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi Bruno, Bruno David Rodrigues wrote: > > with mo-record = true, kannel will TRY to convert to iso-8859-1 only. > > If mo-record is false or kannel can't convert UCS2 to iso-8859-1 (because > of a unknown char), kannel will behave just like before: text will have the > ucs2 string, coding (%c)

Re: [RFI] octstr_recode

2002-03-06 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, Andreas Fink wrote: > What I am missing besides that is incoming support for UDH so we can > receive incoming a ringtone or similar. So a %u could be used (if > thats not taken). I need this too, and would add it, if somebody else does not. Aarno

Re: Wapbox problems with new Nokia phones

2002-03-05 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Pekka Ahmavuo wrote: > > > > > > > I was almost certainly sure that we would support all Nokia modells > > > (and others that don't relly on the UP.browser additional stuff)?! > > > > Yes, but newer phones may use 1.2 or 1.2.1 and additional headers. > > Pekka, > > can you add msg_dump, so that w

Re: [BUG] Smsbox crash with empty messages

2002-03-05 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Bruno David Rodrigues wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Aarno Syvänen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Kannel-devel (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:53 PM > Subject: Re: [BUG] Smsbox crash with

Re: [BUG] Smsbox crash with empty messages

2002-03-04 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Bruno David Rodrigues wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Bruno David Rodrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:49 PM > Subject: Re: [BUG] Smsbox crash with empty messages > > > Bruno David Rodri

Re: Kannel DNS Problem. "kannel 1.0.3"

2002-03-04 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi Stipe & Bjorn, Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Bjoern Buettner wrote: > > > > I've tried to connect the URL http://d2wap.de Siemens S35 says "unsupported > > content type" > > Is there any DNS FQDN problem (Bug) with Kannel? FQDN are running fine! > > How can I solve the problem ? > > > > The D2 WAP GW

Re: Wapbox problems with new Nokia phones

2002-03-04 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi Stipe & Pekka Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Pekka Ahmavuo wrote: > > > > I have tried to use wapbox (latest cvs-kannel) with Nokia 6310. Fetching a WML- > > page generates generated error message into the log file. > > > > I looked for some other user agents from the log files and tried to figure out

Re: AW: Problems using WAP with siemens S35 /prev.("WARNING: Skipping faulty header. / trouble with SIEMENS S35 / Kannel WAP /" )

2002-03-04 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, Bjoern Buettner wrote: > > ### > 2002-03-02 19:46:08 [1] WARNING: Unknown content type 0x202. > 2002-03-02 19:46:08 [1] WARNING: Skipping faulty header. > 2002-03-02 19:46:08 [1] WARNING: Unknown content type 0x201. > 2002-03-02 19:46:08 [1] WARNING: Skipping faulty header. > 2002-03-02 19:

Re: help needed in wap push

2002-03-04 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Stone Zhang wrote: > > Hi, Dear All, > > I am struggling to use a GSM modem to do wap push with Kannel CVS version! > > There is one line I can not understand about the sample pushkannel.conf from > CVS is > > # SMSC CONNECTIONS, for pushing SI or SL over SMS. You can have many connec- > # tio

Using cyrillic characters with Kannel

2002-03-04 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi List, has someone used Kannel with cyrillic character sets ? (Both MO and MT) Does this require unicode support ? Aarno

Re: accesskey problem

2002-02-25 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi dark, Richard Braakman wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Aarno Syvänen wrote: > > Perhaps you can help yourself ? Wml_definitions.h attributes and their > > token > > representation. You can add new ones here, and perhaps provide the patch > >

Re: accesskey problem

2002-02-22 Thread Aarno Syvänen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Perhaps you can help yourself ? Wml_definitions.h attributes and their > > token > > representation. You can add new ones here, and perhaps provide the patch > >to the > > list. > > i already tried this but it did not work since I dont know the exact syntax > of th

Re: loadable modules ?

2002-02-22 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Alexei Pashkovsky wrote: > > > > I think idea of having the listening http interface inside bearerbox instead > > of running two executables could be usefull too. > > Obviously this should be configurable .. > > that's not how Lars designed it. > > SO I guess this leeds up

Re: accesskey problem

2002-02-22 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi Rainer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi all > > I found a bug in kannel (up to 1.1.5) with WML1.2 code which contains > accesskeys Kannel supports WML1.1, not WML1.2 > > the following code: > > Link > > will be sent as: > > Link > > can anybody help me here or provide me a patch? Per

Re: Kannel Development

2002-02-21 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi List, > > > To the group: Any objections to declare CVS as "stable 1.2.0" and > > "development 1.3.0". None. Uoti's patch enabled me to remove my sleep hack. Aarno

Re: [RFI] Code to NSM, WAP related and MMC

2002-02-20 Thread Aarno Syvänen
haikannel wrote: > > That would be great. Please send them to me. I wanna to test those. > Thank you, > > Le Nhu Hai > > Bruno David Simões Rodrigues wrote: > > > Is there any issue about including code to Nokia Smart Messaging, Wap Push, > > Siemens MMC, etc in kannel ? > > > > Has anyone un

Re: smsbox and mutex detailed analysis

2002-02-19 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi List, Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Uoti Urpala wrote: > > > > Benjamin Lee wrote: > > > > > 2002-02-18 05:15:28 [3] PANIC: gwlib/conn.c:174: unlock_out_real: Mutex unlock >failed. (Called from gwlib/conn.c:793:conn_register.) > > > > This is probably the bug I mentioned a couple of weeks ago. As I

Re: segmentation fault

2002-02-12 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi Peter, Peter Löfman wrote: > > Hi, > > with latest cvs smsbox crashes with error message "segmentation fault" when i try to >send xml ota configuration message. > With the EXACT same configuration with about one week old cvs it is working >perfectly! > > What can be the problem? Problem

Re: MMS

2002-02-11 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Szymon Stasik wrote: > > Hi, > > I wonder if someone have any experiences with MMS and if it is possible > to do some MMS testing with latest kannel? I was trying to investigate > it over the weekend and I'm a bit confused. > > I was able to do the PUSH but then have no idea how to prepare MMS

Re: Wap Push problems

2002-02-07 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi Olivier, Olivier Durécu wrote: > I am testing Kannel wap push capabilities with Alcatel mobile phones but > not successfully. I use AT2 as SMSC. The execution of the AT command > seems OK... > But no push comes on the target phone... Could someone give me a > complete AT+CMGS command, that ha

Re: WTP-SAR and Ericsson T68m

2002-02-05 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Andreas Fink wrote: > > > > >We have encountered a problem using the T68m with Kannel as WAP gw. > > > > > >The log shows the following entry: > > >2002-02-04 13:47:19 [6] DEBUG: WTP_RESP: no sar implemented,aborting > > >transaction > > > > > >which means the client ha

Re: Fwd: Release Status

2002-02-05 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi List, Andreas Fink wrote: > I dont think the size of the project would justify for a two branch > method. However I think we should definitively release 1.1.6 as a > "stable" release pretty soon. Its far more stable than 1.0.3 anyway > and lots of people try to use 1.0.3 and I'm kinda tired t

Re: WARNING: Skipping faulty header. / trouble with SIEMENS S35 /Kannel WAP /

2002-02-04 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi dark, > Now, Kannel implements WSP 1.1 which does not define any Encoding-Version > header. But because of all this, it might be better for Kannel send a > status 400 error reply if a connect request uses unknown headers, rather > than using the capabilities response to signal the problem and

Re: wap push

2002-02-01 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, Stone Zhang wrote: > > Dear All > I just jion in the group. > I got a couple of questions: > first of all, I am wondering how can I make the 1.1.15 support wap push, CVS does support WAP Push > secondly, how can I join in the project -- WAP 1.2 / June 2000 conformance > cheers You can h

Re: wap push handset

2002-02-01 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, Dermot Bradley wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Aarno [iso-8859-1] Syvänen wrote: > > > > Nokia 9210 (at least our upgraded versions, don't know if all) > > > Ericsson R520m > > > Ericsson T68m > > > > I can add > > > > Nokia 8310 > > Ericsson T39m > > Siemens S45 certainly do

Re: wap push handset

2002-01-31 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Zhou Ye wrote: > > > > I wanted to know what specific handsets support WAP Push, appreciate it if you can >share your expertise. > > Also is any special hardward needed in the telco to handle WAP Push, or can we use >say SMPP or UCP straight to a conventional SMSC and be O

Re: Too many concurrent allocations.

2002-01-31 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, Benjamin Lee wrote: > After running the cvs 20020126 version of kannel connected to an SMPP > gateway quite happily for the last 6 days... kannel died with: > > 2002-01-31 00:11:22 [8] PANIC: Too many concurrent allocations. > > Does this imply that the server it was running on ran out of

Re: WAP MMS and large data transfer ?

2002-01-30 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Paul Keogh wrote: > > > > The 2.0 spec. references large data xfer in the Wireless TCP optimisations > document and then the Mobile Multimedia Drafting Committee (MMDC) charter > document > from 9/2001 refers to; > > "WPG ... "output from the large data transfer extension to WAP 1.X protocol >

Re: WAP MMS and large data transfer ?

2002-01-30 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi Paul, Paul Keogh wrote: > > Does anyone know if the the large data transfer extensions > are mandatory for MMS (or does the lack of them just restrict > the max. size of your messages ?). Also, any pointers to the > large data extensions specs ? The LDT WG was folded into WAP > NG at some poi

Re: timeout-A-Problem

2002-01-30 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, WERKSTUDENT1 wrote: > I checked my servlet and it takes about 5 seconds to perform all necessary > tasks! Kannel only waits about 3 seconds. > > Is there a way to increase this 3-second-timeout? Timer-freq should work, double the default value. If it does not work there is a bug I must f

Re: Wapbox does an idle loop in some cases

2002-01-25 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Aarno Syvänen wrote: > > > Using wapbox only for pushing (fetching is done by operator's gateway) > > seems to > > cause an idle loop, one thread (poll thread) taking up to 40 % of CPU > > time. > > > > I hope that this d

OTA compiler added to CVS

2002-01-25 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi List, I just added OTA compiler (for compiling XML settings and bookmarks documents) to CVS. Settings part is tested with T39m and 6210, bookmarks with 6210. Well bookmarks are tested with T39m, they just do not work ;) It would be nice to have test reports. I would like to is this for-Nokia-

Re: AW: AW: Timeout-A - more info

2002-01-25 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Marc schrieb: > > > > Yes, I can, but please remember that it even does not work when I replace > > the function call of 'doConversions()' with a simple while-do-nothing-loop! > > So the servlet just does nothing, it waits, then it returns the requested > > wml-content witho

Wapbox does an idle loop in some cases

2002-01-24 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi List, Using wapbox only for pushing (fetching is done by operator's gateway) seems to cause an idle loop, one thread (poll thread) taking up to 40 % of CPU time. I hope that this does not happen when wapbox is used for fetching (I cannot test this myself). The backtrace of the idle loop fo

Re: AW: Timeout-A - more info

2002-01-24 Thread Aarno Syvänen
WERKSTUDENT1 wrote: > OK: I've got a client simulator using the kannel-wap-gw. It requests for > some content from a web server. The web server starts my servlet which is > performing some conversion methods before sending back the adapted content. > > Without performing any conversion the respo

<    1   2   3   >