Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?

2001-10-03 Thread jakob . gaardsted
Hi. This actually works, thank you ! (The sender now gets a 'message delivered' instead of 'problem with receiving device' message). They (kannel and the modem) sure do talk a lot, though. But, I'm curious: This workaround, is it generally needed because of a problem with falcom, or is it

Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?

2001-10-03 Thread Andrea Viscovich
Matt, I would like you to patch the at code and let at2 code from Andreas Fink. By the way maybe someone won't agree with this, but having an at3 is not so good. Anybody using at currently has any comments? Andrea

Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?

2001-10-03 Thread Alexei
Why is it that bad to have at3 ? Current AT module is buggy but it works, AT2 is worse cause sometimes my Siemens M20T just stop receiving any messages under it. I think adding AT3 till we get the perfect one is a good idea. I am willing to test the new At module which saves messages into a sim

Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?

2001-10-03 Thread Matt Flax
On 3 October 2001, Alexei wrote: Why is it that bad to have at3 ? Current AT module is buggy but it works, AT2 is worse cause sometimes my Siemens M20T just stop receiving any messages under it. I think adding AT3 till we get the perfect one is a good idea. I am willing to test the new At

gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?

2001-10-02 Thread jakob . gaardsted
Hi. I'm running 'latest kannel cvs' (sep28) with a Falcom A2D1 modem, and the at smsc interface (*) It seems the modem/kannel is not acknowledging the incoming SMSs the way the telco SMSC (some kind of EMI2, I assume) wants it. Whenever I send an SMS from a regular mobile, two things happen: 1)