thanks Andreas!
Is that GSM AT PDU decoder in the cvs?! :)) If not, it should :)
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL
--
-- 0015000B811037353312F6A803F4F21C?
--
-- +CMGS: 84
--
-- OK
Debug output of smsc_at2.c:
AT2[m20]: -- AT+CMGS=17^M
AT2[m20]: --
AT2[m20]: send command status: 1
AT2[m20]: -- 0011000C91947153332361A703F4F21C
AT2[m20]: -- ^Z
AT2[m20]: --
AT2[m20]: -- +CMGS: 89
AT2[m20]: -- OK
can someone explain
On Freitag, November 8, 2002, at 02:13 Uhr, Stipe Tolj wrote:
From: Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fre Nov 8, 2002 2:13:12 Uhr Europe/Zurich
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: smsc_at2.c PDU coding
Hi list,
I have some problems with an Siemens M20.
In
void at2_read_buffer
tv.tv_sec = 0;
tv.tv_usec = 1000;
ret = select(privdata-fd + 1, read_fd, NULL, NULL, tv);
If I disconnect modem from serial the above select does not
return anything,at leastin the 2 hours I waited :-)
So I'm wondering if anybody knows ifwe should changetv.tv_usec
to
quot;-- Isaac Asimov
-Original Message-From: Andrea Viscovich
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:21
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: tv_sec on
smsc_at2
In
void at2_read_buffer
tv.tv_sec = 0;
tv.tv_usec = 1000;
ret = select(privdata-fd + 1, read_fd, NUL
Hi there,
when you connect to a M20 via the AT2 driver and try to send a one
character message the whole things fails like this:
2002-05-15 09:23:25 [19] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: sms received
2002-05-15 09:23:26 [6] DEBUG: AT2[m20]: international starting with +
(+49snip)
2002-05-15 09:23:26 [6]
(972)-9-9581711 (ext: 116)
::..
'First things first -- but not necessarily in that order'
-- Dr Who
-Original Message-
From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [BUG] smsc_at2.c: sending a one character
On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 11:26, David Holland wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 04:21:08PM +0100, Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
something must gone wrong...
snapshot-timestamp says Apr 09, snapshot doesn't have my patch
and I've commited it on Apr 10
OK. There was a missing /row in userguide.xml. I
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 05:14:44PM +0100, Bruno David Simões Rodrigues wrote:
Shouldn't the scripts detect the error and send us an email to
devel-reports ? ;)
Yes :-(
Dave
--
David Holland =*= Systems Manager =*= tel: +44 01223 478900
http://www.3glab.com/ =*= 3G Lab,
Inside the code there is a call to at+cmms=2
if(list_len(privdata-outgoing_queue) 1)
at2_send_modem_command(privdata, AT+CMMS=2, 0, 0);
On all wavecom this generates an error response.
Looking to at manual (wavecom) there is no mention to this.
Does anybody know anything about it?
Andrea
: Andrea Viscovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: smsc_at2.c at+cmms=2
Inside the code there is a call to at+cmms=2
if(list_len(privdata-outgoing_queue) 1)
at2_send_modem_command(privdata, AT+CMMS=2, 0, 0);
On all wavecom
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: smsc_at2.c at+cmms=2
Inside the code there is a call to at+cmms=2
if(list_len(privdata-outgoing_queue) 1)
at2_send_modem_command(privdata, AT+CMMS=2, 0, 0);
On all wavecom
On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 12:57, Alex Judd wrote:
+CMMS is More messages to send and is used by the Siemens, however not
by most other devices.
Uhm. I've set it disabled by default because altough it works with nokia
6210, it ain't working with Siemens M20...
Thanks Alex and Oded.
but latest CVS
has a configuration for that (in modems.conf) that is disabled by
default for most modem types
I just dowloaded latest tar.gz (snapshot). There is exactly the same code:
void at2_send_messages(PrivAT2data *privdata)
{
Msg *msg;
do
{
- Original Message -
From: Andrea Viscovich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alex Judd [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Oded Arbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: smsc_at2.c at+cmms=2
Thanks Alex and Oded.
but latest CVS
has a configuration
Subject: Snapshots aren't being built (Was: Re: smsc_at2.c at+cmms=2)
Hi Bruno,
can you tell me why this happens?
Still I tought snapshot were built at 4.00 every morning.
Is there any reason as someone stopeed it?
Cheers
Andrea
I think that at2 should autodetect speed if it doesn't find any speed
setting, in the smsc group or modems.conf, or if the smsc speed setting
is set to 0 regardless of the modems.conf setting, or the modems.conf
setting is set to 0 - isn't that the case now ?
No. Now you must set speed=0 if
Bruno David Rodrigues wrote:
If we choose the modem, should kannel autodetect the speed or try to
autodetect?
Andrea wants to kannel always autodetect speed unless it's explicity set in
smsc group
I chosed to have a known working speed in modems.conf and use it, and only
force
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that at2 should autodetect speed if it doesn't find any speed
setting, in the smsc group or modems.conf, or if the smsc speed setting
is set to 0 regardless of the modems.conf setting, or the modems.conf
setting is set to 0 - isn't that the case now ?
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Oded Arbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: Rif: RE: speed (smsc_at2.c)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that at2 should autodetect speed if it doesn't find any speed
setting, in the smsc group
+1 for me :-)
Andrea
- Original Message -
From: Bruno David Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Oded Arbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: Rif: RE: speed (smsc_at2.c)
But that's
Well, I noticed an error is caused by the different
speed.
As noticed by someone else there should be some problems
autodetecting speed.
As Bruno said speed should be autodetected if not
specified,
by the way is not so now (but it was).
I have 6 modem wavecom
5 modem has 9600, one has 19200.
.
- Original Message -
From:
Andrea Viscovich
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:44
PM
Subject: speed (smsc_at2.c)
Well, I noticed an error is caused by the different
speed.
As noticed by someone else there should be some problems
autodetecting
If you set the modemtype, kannel will use the group from modems.conf, and
if speed
is unset in it, kannel uses 9600.
If you explicitly want kannel to autodetect, use speed = 0 in smsc group.
I would have preferred to not set speed=0 to have it autodetect.
Now that I know it, I'll do it.
Actually
Just set the speed on the smscgroup you want
- Original Message -
From: Andrea Viscovich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:27 PM
Subject: Re: speed (smsc_at2.c)
If you set the modemtype, kannel will use the group from modems.conf, and
if speed
Gates will just redefine Darkness(TM) as the new industry
standard.
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Viscovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: smsc_at2
Today I sent to my wavecom gsm modem (at2 current cvs)
a sms
we should do two things - (a) teach kannel to
look for +CMT: and not any +CMT and (b) apply the
SIM buffering patch
Why does it do so with alphanumeric sender ? I guess it's modem
dependant and nothing Kannel can do about.
Hi there,
I totally agree with you, we have to change to +CMT:,
Today I sent to my wavecom gsm modem (at2 current cvs)
a sms with alphanumeric sender.
Instead of the usual +CMT:, 25 (or whatever number) and the pdu,
I got: +CMTI: SM,3
nothing else. Obviusly kannel said I got CMT but wait next line timed out.
I think we should do something in at2 before new
patch applied, thanks!
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
Patch attached. pretty straight forward.
hope I've seen the last of 'em :-)
TIA
Oded Arbel
m-Wise Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
I learned that it is the weak who are cruel,
and that gentleness is to be expected only from the strong.
--Leo Rosten
smsc_at2.patch
smsc_at2.patch
Oded Arbel wrote:
Patch attached. pretty straight forward.
hope I've seen the last of 'em :-)
any objections from your side Andreas?
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel:
Nektarios K. Papadopoulos wrote:
I am using smsc_at with a NOKIA Premicell.
Thoughth to give a try on smsc_at2. What I was getting was something
like:
2002-02-20 01:20:24 [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: -- +CSMS: (0)
2002-02-20 01:20:24 [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: -- OK
2002-02-20 01
yes this is a bug. +CSMS(0) should return Phase 2+ is not supported.
the nokia premicel is probably the only device left on this planet
which doesnt support phase 2+.
Hi Andreas.
No. I'm plenty of devices who doesn't support it. Even a wavecom dual band
and a 7110.
Well my 7110 and my
Lucio Ferrao wrote:
When smsc_at2 sent a message in 7bit the length written in the PDU did not
include
the escape chars. I solved the problem calling the charset_latin1_to_gsm a
little earlier.
This lead to missing end chars when using escaped chars []...
Lucio Ferrao
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 10:06 PM
Cc: Devel@Kannel. 3glab. Org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smsc_at2.c not counting escape caracters
(gsm7bit)
Lucio Ferrao wrote:
When smsc_at2 sent a message in 7bit the length
written in the PDU did not
include
the escape
-
From: Stipe Tolj
Cc: Devel@Kannel. 3glab. Org
Sent: 1/23/02 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smsc_at2.c not counting escape caracters (gsm7bit)
Lucio Ferrao wrote:
When smsc_at2 sent a message in 7bit the length written in the
PDU did not
include
the escape chars. I solved the problem calling
Hi List,
I'm thinking about a general overhaul in this area. The interaction of
* 7bit escape characters
* UDH with multiple IEI's
* message splitting and concatenation
is a big mess right now (IMHO).
I agree to some extent. Things are done in different places or even done twice.
We have to
, 2002 1:56 PM
To: Oded Arbel
Subject: RE: [PATCH] smsc_at2.c not counting escape caracters (gsm7bit)
Looks sensible. Check your at2_wait_mdoem_command which you're calling
with 4 parameters in the patch however I think adding your changes to
cvs
makes sense.
Alex
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Oded Arbel
The changes make sense to me including a minor fix for error handling and
the major flow changes are well commented so if someone can test in a live
environment I would vote for commiting.
Alex
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Oded Arbel wrote:
Hi list.
Since we're already discussing the at2 gsm7bit
Oded Arbel wrote:
Hi list.
Since we're already discussing the at2 gsm7bit escaping issue, I would
like to resubmit my suggested fix for the problem (as apparently it did
not arrive to the proper authorities the first time). my apologies if
you are reading it for the second time.
I would
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Just applied the patch to a test environment and giving it a try for
various smsc types.
tested messages via EMI2, SMPP and AT2, all ok. +1 for commitment from
my side.
Can someone test against the issues the patch is fixing, I guess I
only tried to send normal messages
septets or octets this
message will contain after encoding (based on the message's coding).
I then changed smsc_at2.c to use that function to intialize len in
at2_pdu_encode() to the right value, no matter what encoding the msg
will be delivered.
then to the real problem at hand : to shared.c I
.
-- Fishizm
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:19 AM
To: Oded Arbel
Subject: RE: A question about PDU encoding in smsc_at2
oh - I get it : the UDH is already encoded correctly using the right
DCS
before the call
(for example - the square
brackets which I like to use), the modem rejects the message with error
304 invalid PDU mode parameter.
Well, this will probably hurt you, but I'm afraid square brackets are not
part of GSM character set.
At least I didn't see them there.
-Original Message-
From: Alexei Pashkovsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 5:09 PM
To: Oded Arbel
Cc: Kannel-devel (E-mail)
Subject: Re: A question about PDU encoding in smsc_at2
(for example - the square
brackets which I like to use), the modem rejects
Alexei Pashkovsky wrote:
(for example - the square
brackets which I like to use), the modem rejects the message with error
304 invalid PDU mode parameter.
Well, this will probably hurt you, but I'm afraid square brackets are not
part of GSM character set.
At least I didn't see them there.
choose any direction.
-Original Message-
From: Dave White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 5:26 PM
To: Kannel-devel (E-mail)
Subject: Re: A question about PDU encoding in smsc_at2
Alexei Pashkovsky wrote:
(for example - the square
brackets which I like to use
This is not exactly what I had in mind - (a) as this kind of string
would get translated by kannel to '?' as ESC will be translated
directly to '?'. (b) the GSM standards _currently_ do define the ESC
sequences as valid. I'm not really worried about current standard
support in phone (as newer
: A question about PDU encoding in smsc_at2
Hi list.
I was wandering about this part from smsc_at2.c :
snip
if(octstr_len(msg-sms.udhdata)) {
if (msg-sms.coding == DC_8BIT || msg-sms.coding == DC_UCS2)
{
len += octstr_len(msg-sms.udhdata);
} else
well it doesn't - I can prove it :-)
at2_write_line_cstr always return 0 no matter what happens.
what do you say about this patch ?
Oded Arbel
m-Wise ltd.
smsc_at2.patch
Description: smsc_at2.patch
well it doesn't - I can prove it :-)
at2_write_line_cstr always return 0 no matter what happens.
what do you say about this patch ?
You're right by saying at2_write_line_cstr always returns 0. I
consider that a cosmetic bug. However that has absolutely no
influence as the return code is
the at2_wait_modem_command call which would have
failed anyway.
Oded Arbel
m-Wise ltd.
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 6:43 PM
To: Oded Arbel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: smsc_at2 module doesnot detect failed writes to modem.
well
Title: Re: question about smsc_AT2
hello,
i ask you
this question some days ago but i never got a clear
answer here it is again,
i would like
to use smsc_at2 file but i amnot sure which file to update to tell
kannel that i want to use at2 and not at could you please tell me
which file
53 matches
Mail list logo
