Hi List,
I wrote last week a smsc drive (that's I were not answering push
question ?)
This could, in principle, be added to cvs, if there is interest. Some
stabilation
is required, however.
Aarno
Hi,
User guide contains some example xml documents.
Aarno
On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 08:10 AM, Vijay Patwari wrote:
Hello All,
do kannel gateway-1.3.1 support OTA service
Configuration, if so plz sa me hw to test it... plz
mail.
cheers
vijay
Good day,
I was wondering if you help us in configuring kannel to accept/send using
unicode?
I tried the solution given to me in users kannel group but to no avail.
and I found out that kannel can only send Unicode on emi2? How about the
other drivers? Or was kannel has been tested in
I wrote last week a smsc drive (that's I were not answering push
question ?)
This could, in principle, be added to cvs, if there is interest. Some
stabilation
is required, however.
What operators use that protocol?
Angel Fradejas
Mediafusion Espana, S.A.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.mediafusion.es
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
Hi List,
I wrote last week a smsc drive (that's I were not answering push
question ?)
This could, in principle, be added to cvs, if there is interest. Some
stabilation
is required, however.
I guess if it's in SMSConn API style, it's always welcome.
Stipe
[EMAIL
Hi list,
something mysterious has happend after commiting cimd2_smsc2.c patches
written by Angel Fradejas. there were problems with sleep times and Angel
wrote the final patch (file was called cimd2_fix2.diff) and it was
commited by Stipe. recently I did cvs update and seems like most recent
fix
Hi,
does they support WAP 2.0 ? This uses a different bytecode.
Aarno
On Friday, March 28, 2003, at 08:20 AM, Dedy Sutanto wrote:
Hi Stipe,
Here I attach explanation for header smart trust used to deliver their
byte code. I hope it's clear enough for everyone to understand.
My comment for
It seems to be a problem in the translation from GSM to latin1. 0x00 is '@'
in GSM alphabet. so I think there's something with that.
What version of kannel are you using?
Angel Fradejas
Mediafusión España, S.A.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.mediafusion.es
Tel. +34 91 252 32 00
Fax +34 91 572 27 08
Where am I going to add these additional configuration?
In smsbox, sms-service?
shoud I add these like this?
unicode = UCS16
coding = 3
I tried adding these additional configuration but to no avail.
Thanks again,
Andy
Andreas Fink wrote:
there is nothing to be configured for using unicode.
David Chkhartishvili wrote:
Any ideas about that?
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@ @t@ @t@ @t@ è from 99599182418 to 5244
That looks like an MO that the client has sent as Unicode to me. Can you
check the dcs?
--
Ian Cass
On Montag, März 31, 2003, at 10:59 Uhr, Angel Fradejas wrote:
Where am I going to add these additional configuration?
In smsbox, sms-service?
shoud I add these like this?
unicode = UCS16
coding = 3
I tried adding these additional configuration but to no avail.
No, that's wrong. Andreas was
David Chkhartishvili wrote:
data coding is 8 (and that's correct).
Well there you go then. data_coding 8 = UCS2.
The guy has sent his MO with his handset set to Unicode. You need to parse 2
bytes at a time.
--
Ian Cass
I see, but I supposed that mo-recode will do that.
Ian Cass wrote:
David Chkhartishvili wrote:
data coding is 8 (and that's correct).
Well there you go then. data_coding 8 = UCS2.
The guy has sent his MO with his handset set to Unicode. You need to parse 2
bytes at a time.
--
Ian Cass
When connectionless push is sent through SMPP, kannel doesn't defined 'service_type'
and 'protocol-id' in submit_sm method. Why?
Best Regards,
Guanghua Hou
Stipe, could you revert smsc_cimd2.c to version 1.7 and then apply the
second patch?
done, please check.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax:
When connectionless push is sent through SMPP, kannel doesn't defined 'service_type'
and 'protocol-id' in submit_sm method. Why?
Best Regards,
Guanghua Hou
On Montag, März 31, 2003, at 11:46 Uhr, Angel Fradejas wrote:
Everyone in Switzerland, one could almost say;) LAPI actually speaks
with LAMA, that is 'Large account management application'. And not
SMSC at all (probably it is ESME). Something like it was bound to
appear sooner or later.
mmm I
Michael Mulcahy wrote:
I have attached a simple perl script that reproduces the problem (for
me anyway:). It listens on port 8080 and disconnects the listener socket
when a connection attempt is made.
My test case consists of fakesmsc - bearerbox - smsbox - perl script
with smsbox sending
yep, +1, commited the fix to cvs. Thanks Michael!
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:
has been commited, thanks.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
semes like the problem is related with CVS (possibly at my side).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/kannel/gateway/gw/smsc$ rm smsc_cimd2.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/kannel/gateway/gw/smsc$ cvs update
cvs server: Updating .
U smsc_cimd2.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/kannel/gateway/gw/smsc$ tail -n 2 CVS/Entries
here is more informative view:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/kannel/gateway/gw/smsc$ cvs status smsc_cimd2.c
===
File: smsc_cimd2.c Status: Up-to-date
Working revision:1.8
Repository revision: 1.8
so the question is - why mine cvs update didin't fetch version 1.9?
I guess it has still it's sticky bit on it for the revision you
updated previously.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470
yes, you were right. specifying -r1.9, then -rHEAD in the end of cvs update command
solved the problem. i'm curious to know of cvs mechanism itself - is there any time
which has to pass in order to say for 'cvs update' to get the most recent files,
i.e. when
HEAD version becomes most recent ?
Hi,
Just skim through the project list and see this. Shouldn't we use
gethostbyname_r reentrantable instead? The catch: gethostbyname_r()
only available in glibc2.
Any comments.
Regards,
Tom Phan
On Dienstag, April 1, 2003, at 02:16 Uhr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I cannot find the % options that can be specified as part of a DLR callback. I managed
to track down %d as the type of callback, but is there any other information, that can
be parameterised as part of the URL.
Perhaps I
Hi Stipe,
On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 11:42 PM, Stipe Tolj wrote:
I'm looking at WAP-209-MMSEncapsulation-20020105-a.pdf and my hex dump.
As an example, I'm looking for the 'Message-Type' field (0x0c according
to section 7.3) which should be equal to 'm-send-req' (0x80, according
to section
hi,
may i ask if what is the specific format on how to
access the http using a simple sms message? do i need
a specific format in order to a url site? and if there
are key words, does kannel have it's own keywords or
does the developer need to specify it's own key words?
thanks in advance :)
Dziugas Baltrunas wrote:
something mysterious has happend after commiting cimd2_smsc2.c patches
written by Angel Fradejas. there were problems with sleep times and Angel
wrote the final patch (file was called cimd2_fix2.diff) and it was
commited by Stipe. recently I did cvs update and seems
29 matches
Mail list logo