RE: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch

2006-06-14 Thread Rene Kluwen
Okay... here's my 2 cts... I disagree with you, Stipe. smsbox needs to connect to the/a bearerbox. So the bearerbox-port should be a configuration parameter of smsbox. I will give you some logic: 1. smsbox connects to the tuple (bearerbox-host:bearerbox-port) 2. bearerbox-host is a configuration

Re: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch

2006-06-14 Thread Stipe Tolj
Mi Reflejo wrote: Good one, Alex Adding bearerbox-port to smsbox group should be a good solution. I'll follow that way. nop, I'm -0 on this... see my response on the other mail for argues. Alex argues that smsbox would be "runnable" without core group... now, that doesn't make sense in the c

Re: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch

2006-06-14 Thread Stipe Tolj
Mi Reflejo wrote: Hi Stipe, On 6/14/06, Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: that's a problem indeed. AFAIU the smsbox connects to the sqlbox rather then the bearerbox port. So sqlbox acts (from the view of smsbox) as bearerbox. Ok, that's why you guys need to seperate and add the config.

Re: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch

2006-06-14 Thread Stipe Tolj
Alexander Malysh wrote: Hi, why not simple define port in smsbox group always. so it would be possible: a) easier split bearerbox smsbox on different hosts w/o a need to define core group; b) tell smsbox to connect to any port also to sqlbox Anyway we have bearerbox-host config variable alr

RE: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch

2006-06-14 Thread Rene Kluwen
Alex, this is why Kannel needs you :)... Agreeing here. Rene Kluwen Chimit -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alexander Malysh Sent: woensdag 14 juni 2006 17:37 To: devel@kannel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch Hi, why not simp

setting sender on Wap Push

2006-06-14 Thread Juan Nin
Hi! I got PPG running for sending Wap Push and everything works fine. It seems Kannel sends "1234" as the default sender in Wap Pushes, but I want to set it to the short code where the user has sent his MO to. I've found no parameter where to set that on PPG or anyhting... The only possibili

Re: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch

2006-06-14 Thread Mi Reflejo
Good one, Alex Adding bearerbox-port to smsbox group should be a good solution. I'll follow that way. Stipe, I'm waiting for your "sceleton build environment". Martin. On 6/14/06, Alexander Malysh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, why not simple define port in smsbox group always. so it would be

Re: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch

2006-06-14 Thread Alexander Malysh
Hi, why not simple define port in smsbox group always. so it would be possible: a) easier split bearerbox smsbox on different hosts w/o a need to define core group; b) tell smsbox to connect to any port also to sqlbox Anyway we have bearerbox-host config variable already in place, so just ad

Re: [Fwd: error after receiving messages (modem is wavecom)]

2006-06-14 Thread Andrija Petrovic
Hi Stipe, mi u Beogradu se jos odlicno secamo hrvatskog, srdacan pozdrav iz Srbije! Stipe Tolj wrote: Hi Andrija, (prvo, ako znas hrvatski sto pripostavljam, dobar dan i pozdrav ;) Andrija Petrovic wrote: Hi, Stipe, well, I did a lot of tinkering on smsc_at.c (as you may have guessed by no

Re: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch

2006-06-14 Thread Mi Reflejo
Hi Stipe, On 6/14/06, Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: that's a problem indeed. AFAIU the smsbox connects to the sqlbox rather then the bearerbox port. So sqlbox acts (from the view of smsbox) as bearerbox. Ok, that's why you guys need to seperate and add the config. But I think you shoul

Re: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch

2006-06-14 Thread Stipe Tolj
Hi Martin, Mi Reflejo wrote: yes, but i don't think that sqlbox can be moved out of Kannel since some modification to smsbox need to be made. *** that's a problem indeed. AFAIU the smsbox connects to the sqlbox rather then the bearerbox port. So sqlbox acts (from the view of smsbox) as beare

Re: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch

2006-06-14 Thread Stipe Tolj
Rene Kluwen wrote: Some comments: - configure SHOULD be included in the patch. Because "nobody" uses autoconf to build their configure itself. This is way different from .o files... because they are not included in the repository. yeah, the configure should be commited to CVS of course. But u

Re: Problem : logging wap access to access-log

2006-06-14 Thread Stipe Tolj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I tried both modifications separately and at the same time, with no result. I removed nearly everything from the config file. No result again. I finally added an access-log directive to the wapbox group and it works ... yep, that's where it belongs to for WAP req

Re: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch

2006-06-14 Thread Mi Reflejo
omg Rene takes all the responsibility and he has answered before me I'll think how can i make sqlbox a standalone module. Rene: Are you with me right? ;) M On 6/14/06, Mi Reflejo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: err. Rene won't take responsibility. so i'll answer. ;) On 6/13/06, Stipe Tolj <[EMAI