Hi,
the warnings while compile are OK.
When kannel segfaults? when compile or starting kannel? If when starting
kannel please provide backtrace.
Kyriacos Sakkas wrote:
Minus attachments.
Kyriacos Sakkas wrote:
Hi,
Trying to compile against cvs, I segfault. Diring compile the only
Maybe I 'am in over my head here, but I'll try anyway.
I have used Kannel for some years now and lately trying to get Mbuni working
as well.
Mbuni, mbuni.org, is a MMS gateway for those who don't know it.
Using Kannel 1.4.1 stable version, released in the Gentoo portage tree and
Mbuni 1.30 self
Hi Alexander,
So us to be clear, me programing credential are not great, so I will
give the backtrace a go, but if you thing some specials parameters to
gdb would help, please let me know.
Anyway the segfault is at run time, I will try and post a backtrace shortly.
Kyriacos Sakkas
Alexander
well this is a simple error. Kannel's gwlib is being called with a
parameter which is a NULL pointer instead of a octstr.
Its not Kannel's fault but the callers. Kannel's gwlib just barks and
quits instead of continuing with unexpected results.
On 26.11.2007, at 12:08, Nis - Kannel wrote:
Hi,
I just recompiled, and it looks stable, the difference was that up
to now I had been using --with-mysql on the configure, which to be
honest I did not need in this instance, just a force of habit. Anyway I
will now test and if anything comes up I will let you know, but it does
look like
Hi,
we generally don't commit changes for some enabler. If you need generic
solution, please try my patch that allows you to send any TLVs.
Kyriacos Sakkas wrote:
Hi All,
Attached is a patch for nearly all mblox optional TLVs, (I will
update). Like similar patches this does not support
If my packet capturing is correct, everything is parsed ok, but the TLVs
do not get added to the PDU.
Also my log file:
2007-11-26 15:58:08 [4930] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x667eb0 dump:
2007-11-26 15:58:08 [4930] [6] DEBUG: type_name: enquire_link_resp
2007-11-26 15:58:08 [4930] [6] DEBUG:
Hi,
I suppose you didn't defined TLVs in the config and group in meta_data named
smpp instead of smpp-tlv. Example:
In the config
group = smpp-tlv
name = MBbilling
tag = 0x1601
type = integer|nulterminated|octetstring
length = 4
meta_data=?smpp?MBbilling=XXX...
Kyriacos Sakkas wrote:
Call: (Relevant values inserted of courser)
$post .= X-Kannel-Meta-Data:
?smpp-tlv?MBbilling=.$bill.MBoperator=.$operatorid.MBcontentType=100MBcommand=STARTMBsubDate=.date('U000').MBserviceId=XXX\r\n;
Definitions: (Had all as octstring, switched to nullterm for those with
no definite
That's what Alexandar just said...
You're using:
?smpp-tlv?MBbilling=
and it should be:
?smpp?MBbilling=
regards,
Juan
On Nov 26, 2007 12:33 PM, Kyriacos Sakkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Call: (Relevant values inserted of courser)
$post .= X-Kannel-Meta-Data:
Please read carefully :)
Kyriacos Sakkas wrote:
Call: (Relevant values inserted of courser)
$post .= X-Kannel-Meta-Data:
?smpp-tlv?MBbilling=.$bill.MBoperator=.
^^ group should be ?smpp? instead if ?smpp-tlv?
hi All,
That seems to have sorted the parameters missing from PDU error, but
as seen below something dies after I submit one or two messages. looking
into it, as I had some minor issues still pending here with some TLVs,
but if something pops to mind please let me know
2007-11-26 16:46:33
Hi!
Any feedback on this?
Thanks in advance
Juan
On Nov 16, 2007 12:35 PM, Juan Nin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I've been reading the different threads about the problem with
throughput, being this the last one (I think):
http://www.mail-archive.com/devel@kannel.org/msg06847.html
Hi All,
Here is what seems to be a working setup for Mblox using Alexanders
patch. Patch applied to current CVS, no extra options enabled (if I
enable mysql, I get a segfault, YMMV)
I am currently in a testing phase with Mblox and will post any changes
that might come from that, but the following
I have patched the smpp code to throttle outbound messages.
It seems to be working with our outbound provider and has passed there
accptance test.
One of the things I have not addressed in my patch( I am sure I have
missed others also) it what do do if the input is greater than the
output
thnx Alvin!
will test it tomorrow and let u know
On Nov 26, 2007 5:48 PM, Alvin Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here it is.
It was against 1.4.1
I don't remember the exact things I did. But I did spend about a day
thinking about what to do and started a few times.
If you have a problem I
16 matches
Mail list logo
