Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2011-01-10 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
Not at all! :) -- Alejandro Guerrieri aguerri...@kannel.org On 10/01/2011, at 16:20, Stipe Tolj wrote: > Am 10.01.2011 15:43, schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: >> Commited to SVN with the corresponding userguide mods. > > thanks Alejandro! > > I just did some ChangeLog entry "beautifying", hope yo

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2011-01-10 Thread Stipe Tolj
Am 10.01.2011 15:43, schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: > Commited to SVN with the corresponding userguide mods. thanks Alejandro! I just did some ChangeLog entry "beautifying", hope you don't mind my pedantics :p Stipe -- --- Kölner L

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2011-01-10 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
Commited to SVN with the corresponding userguide mods. Regards, -- Alejandro Guerrieri aguerri...@kannel.org On 03/12/2010, at 15:05, Stipe Tolj wrote: > Am 02.12.2010 18:40, schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: >> Ok. I'll write the userguide documentation and commit afterwards. > > thanks Alejandro.

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-12-03 Thread Stipe Tolj
Am 02.12.2010 18:40, schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: > Ok. I'll write the userguide documentation and commit afterwards. thanks Alejandro. I have made some source code intend cleanup, and removed some unnecessary Octstr* that have been used. So it's a bit more "compact" now. In addition added the "w

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-12-02 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
Ok. I'll write the userguide documentation and commit afterwards. Regards, -- Alejandro Guerrieri aguerri...@kannel.org On 02/12/2010, at 18:15, Alexander Malysh wrote: > Hi, > > I checked other daemons and it seems they allow changing of facility as well. > Therefore I change > my opinion o

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-12-02 Thread Alexander Malysh
Hi, I checked other daemons and it seems they allow changing of facility as well. Therefore I change my opinion on this. +1 for this patch. Thanks, Alexander Malysh Am 30.11.2010 um 15:52 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: > Does it hurt to be able to change it? Really? > > I'm all for correctness

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-11-30 Thread Alexander Malysh
it doesn't hurt really but the same argument apply to any specification. Do we need to be correct in implementing specs? we have to use standard and don't try to violate it. I'm -0 for facility config but not blocking. We have to vote for this change. Thanks, Alexander Malysh Am 30.11.2010 um 1

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-11-30 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
Does it hurt to be able to change it? Really? I'm all for correctness, but extra flexibility is usually welcomed imho. -- Alejandro Guerrieri aguerri...@kannel.org On 30/11/2010, at 15:26, Alexander Malysh wrote: > I mean, we should not allow to change syslog-facility because it's standard >

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-11-30 Thread Alexander Malysh
I mean, we should not allow to change syslog-facility because it's standard to use daemon. and most modern syslog daemons allow you match program name and some of then even regex match. Thanks, Alexander Malysh Am 30.11.2010 um 14:58 schrieb Stipe Tolj: > Am 30.11.2010 14:45, schrieb Alejandro

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-11-30 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
I'm fine with that :) -- Alejandro Guerrieri aguerri...@kannel.org On 30/11/2010, at 14:58, Stipe Tolj wrote: > Am 30.11.2010 14:45, schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: >> That's extremely unflexible imho. If you want to get kannel to log alone >> without being cluttered with other daemon's logs, you

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-11-30 Thread Milan P. Stanic
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 14:58, Stipe Tolj wrote: > Am 30.11.2010 14:45, schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: > > That's extremely unflexible imho. If you want to get kannel to log alone > > without being cluttered with other daemon's logs, you're out of luck. > > > > In our case, we'd like to use it for re

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-11-30 Thread Stipe Tolj
Am 30.11.2010 13:41, schrieb Stipe Tolj: > looking at the created output to /var/log/syslog: > > Nov 30 13:40:28 xxx bearerbox[24686]: [24686] [6] ERROR: error connecting to > server `localhost' at port `2345' > Nov 30 13:40:28 xxx bearerbox[24686]: [24686] [6] ERROR: SMPP[smpp_a]: > Couldn't > c

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-11-30 Thread Stipe Tolj
Am 30.11.2010 14:45, schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: > That's extremely unflexible imho. If you want to get kannel to log alone > without being cluttered with other daemon's logs, you're out of luck. > > In our case, we'd like to use it for remote logging, so we'd use one of the > "user" facilities

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-11-30 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
That's extremely unflexible imho. If you want to get kannel to log alone without being cluttered with other daemon's logs, you're out of luck. In our case, we'd like to use it for remote logging, so we'd use one of the "user" facilities to get kannel and _only_ kannel on it, directed to kannel-

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-11-30 Thread Alexander Malysh
Hi, please don't allow changing syslog-faility because it's "standartized" to use log_daemon for daemons which bearerbox/smsbox/wapbox is. Thanks, Alexander Malysh Am 30.11.2010 um 13:41 schrieb Stipe Tolj: > looking at the created output to /var/log/syslog: > > Nov 30 13:40:28 xxx bearerbox

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-11-30 Thread Stipe Tolj
looking at the created output to /var/log/syslog: Nov 30 13:40:28 xxx bearerbox[24686]: [24686] [6] ERROR: error connecting to server `localhost' at port `2345' Nov 30 13:40:28 xxx bearerbox[24686]: [24686] [6] ERROR: SMPP[smpp_a]: Couldn't connect to server. it would be nice to ommit the OWN [pi

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-11-30 Thread Stipe Tolj
Am 30.11.2010 12:58, schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: > Have you tried playing with the log levels? Syslog accepts up to 7 logging > levels. > > I'll start writing the documentation in the meantime. ok, my fault, I was looking into /var/log/messages only, where I should have looked into /var/log/sys

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-11-30 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
Have you tried playing with the log levels? Syslog accepts up to 7 logging levels. I'll start writing the documentation in the meantime. Regards, -- Alejandro Guerrieri aguerri...@kannel.org On 30/11/2010, at 12:48, Stipe Tolj wrote: > Am 16.11.2010 20:49, schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: >> Prop

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-11-30 Thread Stipe Tolj
Am 16.11.2010 20:49, schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: > Proposed patch implements syslog logging on bearerbox, smsbox and wapbox. > > More details and a link the the patch here: > > http://www.blogalex.com/archives/240 > > Please review. I'll write the userguide patch if it's accepted. I'd love to

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-11-16 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Sorry, don't have the time. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: "Alejandro Guerrieri" To: "Nikos Balkanas" Cc: "Devel Kannel" Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:11 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog Check the patch, that's what

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-11-16 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
. It would be good to use > the same archotecture for the rest. > > BR, > Nikos > - Original Message - From: "Alejandro Guerrieri" > > To: "Devel Kannel" > Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 9:49 PM > Subject: [PATCH] Logging to syslog >

Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-11-16 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Good idea, just that wapbox already supports syslog. It would be good to use the same archotecture for the rest. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: "Alejandro Guerrieri" To: "Devel Kannel" Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 9:49 PM Subject: [PATCH] Logging t

[PATCH] Logging to syslog

2010-11-16 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
Proposed patch implements syslog logging on bearerbox, smsbox and wapbox. More details and a link the the patch here: http://www.blogalex.com/archives/240 Please review. I'll write the userguide patch if it's accepted. Regards, -- Alejandro Guerrieri aguerri...@kannel.org