[mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of
Alan McNatty
Sent: 14 September 2011 22:11
To: Alexander Malysh
Cc: devel@kannel.org; Edgard Cruz
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Ah that's great, thanks Alex.
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 22:08 +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi Alan
Balkanas
Sent: Tuesday, 09 August, 2011 02:11
To: Alan McNatty
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Looks great! +1.
Nikos
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Alan McNatty
a...@catalyst.net.nz
wrote:
Thanks again Nikos,
Yeah 0
wrote:
+1 for me as well.
From: devel-boun...@kannel.org
[mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On
Behalf Of Nikos Balkanas
Sent: Tuesday, 09 August, 2011 02:11
To: Alan McNatty
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Looks great! +1
, 2011 02:11
To: Alan McNatty
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Looks great! +1.
Nikos
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Alan McNatty
a...@catalyst.net.nz
wrote:
Thanks again Nikos,
Yeah 0
.
From: devel-boun...@kannel.org
[mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On
Behalf Of Nikos Balkanas
Sent: Tuesday, 09 August, 2011 02:11
To: Alan McNatty
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Looks great! +1.
Nikos
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2
: Tuesday, 09 August, 2011 02:11
To: Alan McNatty
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Looks great! +1.
Nikos
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Alan McNatty
a...@catalyst.net.nz
wrote:
Thanks again Nikos,
Yeah 0 and 3 are all I'm
it as an
option.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Malysh
amal...@kannel.org
To: Alan McNatty
a...@catalyst.net.nz
Cc: Nikos Balkanas
nbalka...@gmail.com;
de...@vm1.kannel.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:29
PM
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class
configurable
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Looks great! +1.
Nikos
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Alan McNatty
a...@catalyst.net.nz
wrote:
Thanks again Nikos,
Yeah 0 and 3 are all I'm interested in - wasn't sure if
others wanted
support for non-compliant
:08 +0200, Rene Kluwen
wrote:
+1 for me as well.
From: devel-boun...@kannel.org
[mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On
Behalf Of Nikos Balkanas
Sent: Tuesday, 09 August, 2011 02:11
To: Alan McNatty
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Looks great! +1
: Tuesday, 09 August, 2011 02:11
To: Alan McNatty
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Looks great! +1.
Nikos
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Alan McNatty
a...@catalyst.net.nz
wrote:
Thanks again Nikos,
Yeah 0 and 3
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Looks great! +1.
Nikos
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Alan McNatty
a...@catalyst.net.nz
: Tuesday, 09 August, 2011 02:11
To: Alan McNatty
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Looks great! +1.
Nikos
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Alan McNatty
a...@catalyst.net.nz
wrote:
Thanks again Nikos,
Yeah 0 and 3 are all I'm
] On
Behalf Of Nikos Balkanas
Sent: Tuesday, 09 August, 2011 02:11
To: Alan McNatty
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Looks great! +1.
Nikos
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Alan McNatty
a...@catalyst.net.nz
wrote:
Thanks
: Alexander Malysh
amal...@kannel.org
To: Alan McNatty
a...@catalyst.net.nz
Cc: Nikos Balkanas
nbalka...@gmail.com;
de...@vm1.kannel.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:29
PM
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class
configurable?
Hi,
please
...@kannel.org] On
Behalf Of Nikos Balkanas
Sent: Tuesday, 09 August, 2011 02:11
To: Alan McNatty
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Looks great! +1.
Nikos
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Alan McNatty
a...@catalyst.net.nz
: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Looks great! +1.
Nikos
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Alan McNatty
as well.
From: devel-boun...@kannel.org
[mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On
Behalf Of Nikos Balkanas
Sent: Tuesday, 09 August, 2011 02:11
To: Alan McNatty
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Looks great! +1.
Nikos
McNatty
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Looks great! +1.
Nikos
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Alan McNatty
+1 for me as well.
From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of Nikos Balkanas
Sent: Tuesday, 09 August, 2011 02:11
To: Alan McNatty
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Looks great! +1.
Nikos
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2
To: Alan McNatty a...@catalyst.net.nz
Cc: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com;
de...@vm1.kannel.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable
.kannel.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Hi,
please don't change default because we want
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org
To: Alan McNatty a...@catalyst.net.nz
Cc: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com; de...@vm1.kannel.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Hi,
please don't
have
had to manually patch it in.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Alan McNatty a...@catalyst.net.nz
To: devel@kannel.org
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 6:21 AM
Subject: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Hi All,
I found a thread
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Hi,
please don't change default because we want that SMSC
_store_ and _forward_
our message that
is what we also tell SMSC. This works in 99% cases
: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com;
de...@vm1.kannel.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Hi,
please don't change default because we want that SMSC
:21 AM
Subject: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Hi All,
I found a thread on this from back in Feb 2005 (having received a query
from provided now myself) .. last word by Alejandro and a lukewarm (+0 -
+1) comment from Stipe about committing if patch provided. I would
provide a config
Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com; de...@vm1.kannel.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Hi,
please don't change default because we want that SMSC _store_ and _forward_
our message that
is what we also tell SMSC. This works in 99% cases
: Alan McNatty a...@catalyst.net.nz
To: devel@kannel.org
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 6:21 AM
Subject: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Hi All,
I found a thread on this from back in Feb 2005 (having received a query
from provided now myself) .. last word by Alejandro
it
configurable, I have no objections to it. A few people over the years have
had to manually patch it in.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Alan McNatty a...@catalyst.net.nz
To: devel@kannel.org
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 6:21 AM
Subject: Making SMPP esm_class
Hi All,
I found a thread on this from back in Feb 2005 (having received a query
from provided now myself) .. last word by Alejandro and a lukewarm (+0 -
+1) comment from Stipe about committing if patch provided. I would
provide a config patch if anyone would vote in it's favour?
Consider:
Message -
From: Alan McNatty a...@catalyst.net.nz
To: devel@kannel.org
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 6:21 AM
Subject: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?
Hi All,
I found a thread on this from back in Feb 2005 (having received a query
from provided now myself) .. last word by Alejandro
31 matches
Mail list logo
