- Original Message -
From: Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org
To: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com
Cc: Devel Kannel de...@vm1.kannel.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c (Re: syncronize kannel with smsc)
Nikos,
it was in no way
: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c (Re: syncronize kannel with smsc)
Nikos,
it was in no way an insult! but sometimes it better for all of us to think a
little bit longer before write a answer...
Thanks,
Alexander Malysh
Am 14.12.2010 um 13:45
...@kannel.org
To: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com
Cc: Devel Kannel de...@vm1.kannel.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c (Re: syncronize kannel with smsc)
huh you seems to be on the wrong way! btw imbecil is wrong spelled... that
should
nbalka...@gmail.com
Cc: Devel Kannel de...@vm1.kannel.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c (Re: syncronize kannel with smsc)
huh you seems to be on the wrong way! btw imbecil is wrong spelled... that
should be imbecile... but anyway it's just
-
From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On
Behalf Of Alexander Malysh
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 4:28 AM
To: Nikos Balkanas
Cc: Alexander Malysh; ishagh ouldbah; de...@vm1.kannel.org
Subject: Re: Patch: gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c (Re: syncronize kannel with
smsc)
Hi,
it's
- From: Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org
To: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com
Cc: Milan P. Stanic m...@arvanta.net; ishagh ouldbah
ishagh...@yahoo.com; devel@kannel.org
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c (Re: syncronize kannel with smsc
ishagh...@yahoo.com; devel@kannel.org
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c (Re: syncronize kannel with smsc)
Hi,
I don't see why we have to switch to relative time again. Only bug in
kannel is, that validity is in minutes and not
absolute
.kannel.org; Milan P. Stanic
m...@arvanta.net; ishagh ouldbah ishagh...@yahoo.com;
de...@vm1.kannel.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c (Re: syncronize kannel with smsc)
Hi,
it's a condition for every time based parameter that server synchronized
Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com
Cc: Alexander Malysh amal...@vm1.kannel.org; Milan P. Stanic
m...@arvanta.net; ishagh ouldbah ishagh...@yahoo.com;
de...@vm1.kannel.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c (Re: syncronize kannel with smsc)
Hi,
it's
; Devel Kannel devel@kannel.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c (Re: syncronize kannel with smsc)
Nikos,
sometimes you have to think a bit more before you write answer ;) Converting
validity to seconds will not fix this issue because it's again
: Patch: gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c (Re: syncronize kannel with smsc)
Nikos,
sometimes you have to think a bit more before you write answer ;) Converting
validity to seconds will not fix this issue because it's again relative
to something and this something is not the timestamp when message
Hi,
I don't see why we have to switch to relative time again. Only bug in kannel
is, that validity is in minutes and not
absolute time. The same bug apply to deferred.
Thanks,
Alexander Malysh
Am 27.11.2010 um 09:09 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
I stand corrected. bb sends in, at least in SMPP,
,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org
To: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com
Cc: Milan P. Stanic m...@arvanta.net; ishagh ouldbah
ishagh...@yahoo.com; devel@kannel.org
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c (Re
I stand corrected. bb sends in, at least in SMPP, absolute time as GMT +
validity * 60 for validity and scheduled delivery time. Not very safe or
good. Needs the server to be synchronized with SMSc, which would probably
mean both have to be ntp synchronized.
This is a defect of the SMPP spec.
14 matches
Mail list logo
