Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c

2009-11-09 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 12:21 PM Subject: Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c Hi, AFAIK ton and npi always bundled together. Therefore I don't see reason to define only one value... Thanks, Alexander Malysh Am 09.11.2009 um 10:54 schrieb Nikos Balkanas: Hi, I don&#

Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c

2009-11-09 Thread Alexander Malysh
, I can submit that as well. One of the two has to be patche, though. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: Alexander Malysh To: Nikos Balkanas Cc: devel@kannel.org Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 11:32 AM Subject: Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c Hi, I don't see reason to apply this patch. U

Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c

2009-11-09 Thread Nikos Balkanas
t: Monday, November 09, 2009 11:32 AM Subject: Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c Hi, I don't see reason to apply this patch. User can just define ton and npi settings. Maybe userguide patch would be more helpful? Thanks, Alexander Malysh Am 02.11.2009 um 12:31 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:

Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c

2009-11-09 Thread Alexander Malysh
Hi, I don't see reason to apply this patch. User can just define ton and npi settings. Maybe userguide patch would be more helpful? Thanks, Alexander Malysh Am 02.11.2009 um 12:31 schrieb Nikos Balkanas: Hi, This is another one in my series of trivial patches. This part of the configura

Patch: smsc_smpp.c

2009-11-02 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Hi, This is another one in my series of trivial patches. This part of the configuration has caused a lot of confusion in manual configuring dest-addr-ton over the years, with users prefixing their numbers with '+' instead of using the configuration. BR, Nikos smsc_smpp.diff Description: Binar

Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c

2009-10-23 Thread Milan P. Stanic
to read some of it. > > > >BR, > >Nikos > >----- Original Message - > >From: Alexander Malysh > >To: Nikos Balkanas > >Cc: devel@kannel.org Devel > >Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 12:03 PM > >Subject: Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c > > > >

Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c

2009-10-23 Thread Alexander Malysh
I am attaching the last mail, which includes most previous ones. Please take the time to read some of it. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: Alexander Malysh To: Nikos Balkanas Cc: devel@kannel.org Devel Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 12:03 PM Subject: Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c Hi Nikos, ok g

Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c

2009-10-23 Thread Nikos Balkanas
el.org Devel Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 12:03 PM Subject: Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c Hi Nikos, ok got it... We have such discussions many times already and we always got to decision that kannel can't and should't support things that are not standard except it easy to inte

Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c

2009-10-23 Thread Alexander Malysh
009 um 19:24 schrieb Nikos Balkanas: Sure. http://www.mail-archive.com/us...@kannel.org/msg17659.html - Original Message - From: Alexander Malysh To: Nikos Balkanas Cc: devel@kannel.org Devel Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 5:58 PM Subject: Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c can you please

Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c

2009-10-22 Thread Alexander Malysh
to get disappeared after creating all this stir :-( BR Nikos - Original Message - From: Alexander Malysh To: Nikos Balkanas Cc: devel@kannel.org Devel Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 11:08 AM Subject: Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c Hi Nikos, could you please explain why we need this patch

Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c

2009-10-22 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Balkanas Cc: devel@kannel.org Devel Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 11:08 AM Subject: Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c Hi Nikos, could you please explain why we need this patch? Thanks, Alexander Malysh Am 19.10.2009 um 18:30 schrieb Nikos Balkanas: Hi, A trivial patch, that

Patch: smsc_smpp.c

2009-10-19 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Hi, A trivial patch, that should be able to handle all DLRs as long as they keep formal tags. Please test. BR, Nikos smsc_smpp.diff Description: Binary data