Citando Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > btw, should I write a patch for the current CVS ?
>
> always ;)
What are you talking about ?
accept-x-kannel-headers bool Request reply can include special X-Kannel headers
but these are only accepted if this variable is set to
> btw, should I write a patch for the current CVS ?
always ;)
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http:/
I think it's possible :)
therefore i can't understand why the snip about accept-x-kannel-headers
has been removed from userguide?! :)
btw, should I write a patch for the current CVS ?
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> > everything seems to wor
> everything seems to work fine. but what about the userguide?
can you provide a patch in unified format?!
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-29
rent CVS version of kannel. i would like to ask if
> accept-x-kannel-headers behaviour has changed. i have defined
> accept-x-kannel-headers as true in my sms-service, but kannel still
> reports a warning
>
> 2003-03-21 07:24:09 [5] WARNING: Tried to set UDH field, denied.
>
> and
Hi list,
i'm using current CVS version of kannel. i would like to ask if
accept-x-kannel-headers behaviour has changed. i have defined
accept-x-kannel-headers as true in my sms-service, but kannel still
reports a warning
2003-03-21 07:24:09 [5] WARNING: Tried to set UDH field, denied.
an
