Keith Owens wrote:
Before using MSR, you must first check that the cpu supports the
instruction, rd/wrmsr cause an oops on 486 or earlier. Also using an
invalid msr number causes an oops, so use rd/wrmsr_safe().
I didn't bother implementing those checks because kdb recovers
nicely from GPF
CONFIG_X86_MSR=y
means that MSR support is compiled into the kernel, not as a module. So
you do not need to do modprobe. The functionality is built-in. There
will be a file named /dev/cpu/0/msr.
In image 386, the config was:
CONFIG_X86_MSR=m
so with that build, you did need to do the
Hi,
I am Luna.
I want to modprobe msr on OLPC. (I use MIT image 426 on B2)
But it is fail. The error message is “FATAL: Module msr not found.”
To look at config file, I find
CONFIG_X86_MSR=y
Someone can tell me what happen.
I had returned MIT image 386. The command really works.
Sorry,
I misunderstand the mean.
The functionality has been built-in, and I get right msr value.
Thank you.
Luna
-Original Message-
From: Mitch Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 3:10 PM
To: Luna Huang (�S��玲)
Cc: devel@laptop.org
Subject: Re: modprobe msr
On May 17, 2007, at 14:26 , Zarro Boogs per Child wrote:
#1425: Verify that camera activities close the camera device when
not in use.
-
+--
Reporter: jg | Owner: cjb
Type: task|
Manu is working on it... making steady progress and working with Eben
and the mt of mtpaint
On 5/17/07, Zarro Boogs per Child [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#1520: Entering text in Paint needs an extra 'enter'
--+-
Reporter:
Hi,
On Thursday 17 May 2007 04:04, Ivan Krstić wrote:
Hal Murray wrote:
That feels like the tip of a security iceberg. Somebody has to be able
to authorize access to data on the server without the appropriate key,
including getting the key.
I don't think that's anything new from the
Holger Levsen wrote:
Yup. But it would also be nice, if the pupils can ask the server for their
backups, without going via the teacher. For that, an access key on the laptop
would be needed. (So that it's not possible to request someone elses backup.)
I don't think you understood my original
