Re: rawhide report: 20111016 changes - Maven versions

2011-10-17 Thread Alexander Kurtakov
On 09:20:48 Sunday 16 October 2011 Rawhide Report wrote: jline-0.9.94-5.fc17 --- * Sat Oct 15 2011 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi - 0.9.94-5 - BuildRequire maven2. A note to everyone. We are working hard to phase out maven2 as much as possible so as much as this may look

[Test-Announce] 2011-10-17 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2011-10-17 Thread Adam Williamson
WHAT: Fedora QA Meeting WHEN: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 08:00 PDT) WHERE: #fedora-meeting It's meeting time again! First meeting of the F16 Final rush...so it'll be lots of fun. If anyone has anything to add to the agenda, please reply to this mail, and whoever ends up running the meeting will add

Re: grubby and the transition from grub to grub2

2011-10-17 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 11:14 -0700, darrell pfeifer wrote: How does grubby decide which boot loader is running? It doesn't care. It updates any grub config it finds. If you have both grub1 and grub2 configs present, it will update both. I have a system upgraded from grub to grub2. I've yum

Re: PackageKit vice shell

2011-10-17 Thread Richard Hughes
On 16 October 2011 19:00, JB jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote:  pk-command-not-found [OPTION...] We fixed this quite a long time ago. Perhaps upgrading to F15 or F16 might be a good idea? Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: PackageKit vice shell

2011-10-17 Thread Genes MailLists
Also, FYI, you you can disable it (as alternative to deleting): unset -f command_not_found_handle in your .bashrc ... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

rawhide report: 20111017 changes

2011-10-17 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Oct 17 08:15:23 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46 389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46 389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686

No guidelines for packaging of udev rules?

2011-10-17 Thread Richard Shaw
Out of curiosity I decided to see if I could package zfs from http://zfsonlinux.org/. One thing I noticed is that there are both udev rules in /lib/udev/rules.d and /etc/udev/rules.d and I could not find any guidelines on Fedora for what directory was appropriate. I did find a discussion from

Re: No guidelines for packaging of udev rules?

2011-10-17 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:34:58 -0500, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: Out of curiosity I decided to see if I could package zfs from http://zfsonlinux.org/. One thing I noticed is that there are both udev rules in /lib/udev/rules.d and /etc/udev/rules.d and I could not find any

FESCo meeting agenda for 2011-10-17

2011-10-17 Thread Bill Nottingham
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting today at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = #topic #667 Request to fix CRITPATH update

Re: No guidelines for packaging of udev rules?

2011-10-17 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:34:58 -0500, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: Out of curiosity I decided to see if I could package zfs from http://zfsonlinux.org/. One thing I noticed is that there are both udev rules in /lib/udev/rules.d and /etc/udev/rules.d and I could not find any

Re: No guidelines for packaging of udev rules?

2011-10-17 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 17.10.11 08:34, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote: Out of curiosity I decided to see if I could package zfs from http://zfsonlinux.org/. One thing I noticed is that there are both udev rules in /lib/udev/rules.d and /etc/udev/rules.d and I could not find any guidelines on

systemd - standard place to run stuff after the network is up?

2011-10-17 Thread Bruno Wolff III
I want to try to modprobe netconsole during boot, but it needs to happen after the network is up. Is there any standard place (rc.local and modules-load seem to happen too early) to do this? I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746481 against systemd, but it has been closed

Re: No guidelines for packaging of udev rules?

2011-10-17 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 16:07:54 +0200, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: In fact, a package that installs rules files in /etc is almost definitely doing it wrong, and should be fixed. On that note I have filed bug 744230 against apmd which tries to package a config file in

Sourcing one spec from another permissible?

2011-10-17 Thread Richard Shaw
NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a technical one. I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a single source package but contains two spec files. One for the utilities (zfs{,-devel,-dracut,-test}) and one for the kernel module

Re: Sourcing one spec from another permissible?

2011-10-17 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 09:27 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a technical one. I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a single source package but contains two spec files. One for the utilities

Re: Sourcing one spec from another permissible?

2011-10-17 Thread Richard Shaw
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 09:27 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a technical one. I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a single

Re: Sourcing one spec from another permissible?

2011-10-17 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2011/10/17 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com: NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a technical one. I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a single source package but contains two spec files. One for the utilities

Re: Sourcing one spec from another permissible?

2011-10-17 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:27:38AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a technical one. I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a single source package but contains two spec files. One for the utilities

Re: Sourcing one spec from another permissible?

2011-10-17 Thread Richard Shaw
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/10/17 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com: Is it technically possible to source in an spec from within a spec? If that really worth it, I would create a package dropping several macros into /etc/rpm. Then I could

Re: Sourcing one spec from another permissible?

2011-10-17 Thread Richard Shaw
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:27:38AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a technical one. I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a

Re: Sourcing one spec from another permissible?

2011-10-17 Thread Richard Shaw
Ok, I've dug a little deeper and I think there needs to be two separate packages. The reason for this is that the kernel module needs to be rebuilt on every kernel install/update. The current Makefile has a target to create a SRPM for the kernel module. I think I can do something along these

Re: systemd - standard place to run stuff after the network is up?

2011-10-17 Thread Clyde E. Kunkel
On 10/17/2011 10:20 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: I want to try to modprobe netconsole during boot, but it needs to happen after the network is up. Is there any standard place (rc.local and modules-load seem to happen too early) to do this? I filed

Re: systemd - standard place to run stuff after the network is up?

2011-10-17 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 17.10.11 09:20, Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) wrote: I want to try to modprobe netconsole during boot, but it needs to happen after the network is up. Is there any standard place (rc.local and modules-load seem to happen too early) to do this? Well, yes and no. In general doing

Re: systemd - standard place to run stuff after the network is up?

2011-10-17 Thread Simo Sorce
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 19:10 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 17.10.11 09:20, Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) wrote: I want to try to modprobe netconsole during boot, but it needs to happen after the network is up. Is there any standard place (rc.local and modules-load seem to

Re: systemd - standard place to run stuff after the network is up?

2011-10-17 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 17.10.11 13:21, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote: Note that you might still need to enable NetworkManager-wait-online.servce with systemctl enable so that bootup is delayed until NM configured a network. (more precisely: delay network.target until NM configured a network). If

FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-17

2011-10-17 Thread Bill Nottingham
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-17) === Meeting started by notting at 17:01:09 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-10-17/fesco.2011-10-17-17.01.log.html Meeting summary

[Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Final Test Compose 1 (TC1) x86_64 install images available now!

2011-10-17 Thread Andre Robatino
This is a followup to the earlier TC1 announcement http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test-announce/2011-October/000309.html when the x86_64 install images were not available yet. They are now in http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/16.TC1/Fedora/x86_64/iso/ Delta ISOs should be

Re: systemd - standard place to run stuff after the network is up?

2011-10-17 Thread Clyde E. Kunkel
On 10/17/2011 01:10 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: On 10/17/2011 10:20 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: I want to try to modprobe netconsole during boot, but it needs to happen after the network is up. Is there any standard place (rc.local and modules-load seem to happen too early) to do this? I filed

synergy-plu, synergy, and gnome3

2011-10-17 Thread Laine Stump
The version of synergy-plus currently in Fedora doesn't work well with gnome3; I had noticed this because I couldn't get the mouse past the menubar to an alternate screen configured to be north, but there are other problems as well: http://synergy-foss.org/tracker/issues/2958 Since the

Self Introduction

2011-10-17 Thread Jon VanAlten
Hello all, Just going through the process noted at the wiki for becoming a package maintainer[1], so here I am introducing myself. A bit about me: Red Hatter, Open Source Java guy, so far have done much more lurking than participating at least wrt Fedora. I am for now mainly taking on the

Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-17 Thread alekcejk
Hi, The purpose of this bug was to provide native systemd script for cpuspeed in Fedora 16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713572 But instead of adding systemd script which should load cpufreq modules other solution was provided - cpufreq modules was compiled as built-in in Fedora

Re: API change: bump mapnik to 2.0 in rawhide?

2011-10-17 Thread Tom Hughes
On 17/10/11 20:02, Alex Lancaster wrote: Looking at the changelog, it isn't obvious whether this introduces any ABI/API changes or not, hence this e-mail. I just asked Dane on IRC and he confirms that they are not compatible so the soname needs to be bumped. Tom -- Tom Hughes

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-17 Thread alekcejk
Frequency scaling have negative effects for me so I need to have it disabled in BIOS. I think that this is not BIOS option broken but broken kernel with built-in cpufreq modules. If hardware supports disabling frequency scaling then should be possibility to do this. BIOS have such possibility,

Re: API change: bump mapnik to 2.0 in rawhide?

2011-10-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:02:29 -0400 (EDT) Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Hi there, Looks like mapnik has been bumped from 0.7 to 2.0 upstream: http://mapnik.org/news/2011/sep/26/release_2_0/ I am rebuilding mapnik in rawhide to fix broken deps, and I was wondering if

Re: API change: bump mapnik to 2.0 in rawhide?

2011-10-17 Thread Alex Lancaster
On 17/10/11, Tom Hughes wrote: On 17/10/11 20:02, Alex Lancaster wrote: Looking at the changelog, it isn't obvious whether this introduces any ABI/API changes or not, hence this e-mail. I just asked Dane on IRC and he confirms that they are not compatible so the soname needs to be bumped.

Greetings from Olin -- and a package

2011-10-17 Thread Colin Zwiebel
Greetings from the quirky engineering school we call Olin. We three (Kevin, Ashley, and I) are getting a crash course on packaging and other release engineering skills from Sebastian (Sdz https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sdz) We've produced a package for the io programming language.

How to update GMP-using packages

2011-10-17 Thread Jerry James
How should those of us with gmp-using packages manage updates while the update to GMP 5.x is underway? I've got a handful of updates I want to build for Rawhide at some point, but I don't want to cause problems. Should I wait until the GMP update is done and the packages are all tagged, or go

Re: Greetings from Olin -- and a package

2011-10-17 Thread Jon Ciesla
Greetings from the quirky engineering school we call Olin. We three (Kevin, Ashley, and I) are getting a crash course on packaging and other release engineering skills from Sebastian (Sdz https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sdz) We've produced a package for the io programming language.

[Bug 743519] RFE: please update to 0.009

2011-10-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743519 --- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-10-17 04:44:26 EDT --- Thanks for notifying. I've requested to push it

[perl-Sys-Virt] Add binding for virDomainOpenConsole

2011-10-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
commit d31f3ffd024743d38d080cda3f7b98d6d89b0d73 Author: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com Date: Mon Oct 17 11:35:47 2011 +0100 Add binding for virDomainOpenConsole Sys-Virt-0.9.5-open-console.patch | 52 + perl-Sys-Virt.spec|7

[perl-Sys-Virt/f16] Add binding for virDomainOpenConsole

2011-10-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
commit 9e6e9fb82d9cadd9b33826ec7a3927cf4f9993b4 Author: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com Date: Mon Oct 17 11:35:47 2011 +0100 Add binding for virDomainOpenConsole Sys-Virt-0.9.5-open-console.patch | 52 + perl-Sys-Virt.spec|7

[Bug 543660] Perl Archive::Zip fails writing to an unseekable file handle after calling desiredCompressionLevel()

2011-10-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543660 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule

2011-10-17 Thread buildsys
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) On i386: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) Please resolve this as soon

File Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase-0.10.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2011-10-17 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase: 07a9c6f8c7d2b69c03443e5d07d784bd Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase-0.10.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase] update to 0.10

2011-10-17 Thread Iain Arnell
commit a60921b8432f2e740dfa25ce1120750a4c773dee Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Tue Oct 18 05:26:23 2011 +0200 update to 0.10 .gitignore |1 + perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase.spec |5 - sources|2 +- 3 files

[perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase/f16] (2 commits) ...update to 0.10

2011-10-17 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 5c85e38... update to 0.08 (*) a60921b... update to 0.10 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase/f15] (3 commits) ...update to 0.10

2011-10-17 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 9287cff... Perl mass rebuild (*) 5c85e38... update to 0.08 (*) a60921b... update to 0.10 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

File Config-GitLike-1.06.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2011-10-17 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Config-GitLike: 4fbf492b4522c236d5fa70c45f78b0b9 Config-GitLike-1.06.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Config-GitLike] update to 1.06

2011-10-17 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 06d9f19daf082ebd2587bda67cb07210b9d0a00c Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Tue Oct 18 05:49:35 2011 +0200 update to 1.06 .gitignore |1 + perl-Config-GitLike.spec | 10 ++ sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5

[perl-Config-GitLike] remove obsolete patches

2011-10-17 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 5d904f4b4f0dcb1a763726f4681382fcfca57703 Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Tue Oct 18 05:49:56 2011 +0200 remove obsolete patches ...-attributes-from-parent-to-avoid-warnings.patch | 30 -- 0002-silence-uninitialized-warnings.patch | 33

[perl-Config-GitLike/f16] (2 commits) ...remove obsolete patches

2011-10-17 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 06d9f19... update to 1.06 (*) 5d904f4... remove obsolete patches (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[perl-Config-GitLike/f15] (3 commits) ...remove obsolete patches

2011-10-17 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 348b13c... Perl mass rebuild (*) 06d9f19... update to 1.06 (*) 5d904f4... remove obsolete patches (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing