Review swaps

2012-04-23 Thread Pádraig Brady
Hi! I've a simple new package containing some support scripts for the OpenStack packages: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811601 cheers, Pádraig. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Review swaps

2012-04-23 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:34:35AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote: Hi! I've a simple new package containing some support scripts for the OpenStack packages: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811601 This looks very simple, so I took it. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group,

Re: Package libsmbclient needs to be rebuild against new samba4-common

2012-04-23 Thread Kalev Lember
On 04/23/2012 06:22 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 20:53 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote: libsmbclient has been now removed from samba4 package (see bug #814451), but what you have installed is a leftover from the earlier packaging error. Incrementing the epoch number in the samba 3

Re: Package libsmbclient needs to be rebuild against new samba4-common

2012-04-23 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 13:57 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote: On 04/23/2012 06:22 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 20:53 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote: libsmbclient has been now removed from samba4 package (see bug #814451), but what you have installed is a leftover from the earlier

[Test-Announce] 2012-04-23 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2012-04-23 Thread Adam Williamson
up on from last week, and it's time to start planning for Final too! This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic suggestions to the meeting wiki page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20120423 The current proposed agenda is included below. == Proposed Agenda

F-17 Branched report: 20120423 changes

2012-04-23 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Mon Apr 23 08:15:05 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8 [aeolus-configserver] aeolus-configserver-0.4.5-1.fc17.noarch

Orphaning eog

2012-04-23 Thread Siddhesh Poyarekar
Hi, I took eog over when it was orphaned last time, since I though I could work on it some more. I never got around to anything but a couple of bug reports though and I don't think I'm really going to get around to it in the future either, so I'll just orphan it again so that someone who is

[perl-YAML] Fix build and runtime dependencies

2012-04-23 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 48fd123ff83d853a4db030374bda66e1b84cae0f Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Mon Apr 23 13:11:31 2012 +0100 Fix build and runtime dependencies - R: perl(Carp) and perl(Data::Dumper) - BR: perl(Carp), perl(constant) and perl(Exporter) - Release tests no

Re: Fedora 17 Beta Observations

2012-04-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 21:32 -0400, Mark Bidewell wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 07:29 -0400, Mark Bidewell wrote: The VM I used had 1GB of memory. Does the 'basic graphics mode' option

Re: Fedora 18 Release name voting and Poll for whether to continue naming releases

2012-04-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 09:58 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Why isn't adding a link to an explanation to avoid misunderstandings originating from conotations sufficient anymore? This is at least what had been done in the past. 'sufficient' to what purpose? I'm not against release names

Re: general problem - Re: Fedora 16 and the 3.3.1-3 kernel

2012-04-23 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Apr 22, 2012, at 5:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: no 3.3.1 is the current one, 3.3.2 is current but the whole 3.3 line until now elaborates on the same problem not at each boot, mostly only slower but terrible at

Re: Orphaning eog

2012-04-23 Thread Kalev Lember
On 04/23/2012 03:17 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: I took eog over when it was orphaned last time, since I though I could work on it some more. I never got around to anything but a couple of bug reports though and I don't think I'm really going to get around to it in the future either, so I'll

Re: Private-libraries in /usr/lib* - invalid soname.

2012-04-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 17:20 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote: Thanks again. Following this advice when packaging makes perfect sense to me. Still, when reviewing, my question is how hard I should push it. If I understand Kevin correct I shouldn't push it all (?). Is your position that private,

Re: Fedora 18 Release name voting and Poll for whether to continue naming releases

2012-04-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 00:33 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote: On 20.4.2012 18:09, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Never. Nobody uses the code names. It's a waste of time and choosing names like Beefy Miracle is a good way of making the distro look a whole lot less professional. Well, as far as I can tell,

Re: Fedora 18 Release name voting and Poll for whether to continue naming releases

2012-04-23 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 04/23/2012 03:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 09:58 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Why isn't adding a link to an explanation to avoid misunderstandings originating from conotations sufficient anymore? This is at least what had been done in the past. 'sufficient' to what

Re: GitHub is a terrible upstream

2012-04-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 20:51 -0700, Eric Smith wrote: Corey Richardson wrote: Getting source tarballs from github is a nightmare. See http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-February/148676.html The debian tool doesn't help very much because one still needs revision garbage

Re: Fedora 17 Beta Observations

2012-04-23 Thread Mark Bidewell
So it looks for the VMWare 'vmwgfx' driver and it's not there (I'm not sure if that driver is something Fedora would be expected to include, or if it's a 'guest additions' kind of thing). Then it falls back on 'vmwlegacy', which promptly blows up. ajax, airlied, are we expecting this

Re: Login on Fedora 17

2012-04-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 23:59 +0900, Joel Rees wrote: Note that we actually have a test case which is run during validation testing and is intended to ensure that the same keyboard layout is used for setting passwords during installation and entering them post-install, because we had a lot

Re: Fedora 17 Beta Observations

2012-04-23 Thread Tom Hughes
On 23/04/12 14:27, Mark Bidewell wrote: So it looks for the VMWare 'vmwgfx' driver and it's not there (I'm not sure if that driver is something Fedora would be expected to include, or if it's a 'guest additions' kind of thing). Then it falls back on 'vmwlegacy', which promptly blows

Re: Fedora 18 Release name voting and Poll for whether to continue naming releases

2012-04-23 Thread Mark Bidewell
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: On 20.4.2012 18:09, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Never. Nobody uses the code names. It's a waste of time and choosing names like Beefy Miracle is a good way of making the distro look a whole lot less professional. Well, as far

Re: Fedora 17 Beta Observations

2012-04-23 Thread Frank Murphy
On 18/04/12 12:47, Mark Bidewell wrote: After trying the F17 Alpha with no success, I tried the F17 Beta. I installed in the VMWare Fusion Technical Preview F17 Beta Xfce.x86_64 spin, Happily ran on F16.x86_64 host, and installed just dandy. firewalld service by default. But OT for this

Re: Fedora 18 Release name voting and Poll for whether to continue naming releases

2012-04-23 Thread Frank Murphy
On 23/04/12 14:21, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 04/23/2012 03:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 09:58 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Why isn't adding a link to an explanation to avoid misunderstandings originating from conotations sufficient anymore? This is at least what had been

Re: Fedora 18 Release name voting and Poll for whether to continue naming releases

2012-04-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 15:21 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 04/23/2012 03:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 09:58 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Why isn't adding a link to an explanation to avoid misunderstandings originating from conotations sufficient anymore? This is at

Re: Fedora 18 Release name voting and Poll for whether to continue naming releases

2012-04-23 Thread Frank Murphy
On 23/04/12 14:36, Mark Bidewell wrote: I think it has as much to do with the names as anything else. Ubuntu names are short and easy. But their numbering is crap. 12.04 ? Fedora names tend to be more obscure Lucid or Precise makes more sense than Zod or Beefy (forget the fat distro

Re: Fedora 18 Release name voting and Poll for whether to continue naming releases

2012-04-23 Thread Seth Vidal
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Frank Murphy wrote: On 23/04/12 14:36, Mark Bidewell wrote: I think it has as much to do with the names as anything else. Ubuntu names are short and easy. But their numbering is crap. 12.04 ? To be fair their numbering is: YY.MM So 12.04 means April, 2012 -sv

Re: Fedora 18 Release name voting and Poll for whether to continue naming releases

2012-04-23 Thread Frank Murphy
On 23/04/12 14:46, Seth Vidal wrote: But their numbering is crap. 12.04 ? To be fair their numbering is: YY.MM So 12.04 means April, 2012 -sv But, are you going to say in converation Yes, I'm using Ubuntu release twelve zero four, or Lucid Does anyone know the full two words sans

Re: Fedora 18 Release name voting and Poll for whether to continue naming releases

2012-04-23 Thread Mark Bidewell
I am still not sure how we got from Superman's nemesis to hot dogs (at least I think that is where beefy miracle came from...). I didn't know Jules Verne was superman's nemesis. -- Regards, Frank Jack of all, fubars -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Private-libraries in /usr/lib* - invalid soname.

2012-04-23 Thread Alec Leamas
On 04/23/2012 03:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 17:20 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote: Thanks again. Following this advice when packaging makes perfect sense to me. Still, when reviewing, my question is how hard I should push it. If I understand Kevin correct I shouldn't push it

Broken dependencies: perl-AnyEvent

2012-04-23 Thread buildsys
perl-AnyEvent has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-AnyEvent-6.14-1.fc18.x86_64 requires perl(IO::Async::Loop) = 0:0.33 perl-AnyEvent-6.14-1.fc18.x86_64 requires perl(FLTK) = 0:0.532 perl-AnyEvent-6.14-1.fc18.x86_64 requires perl(Cocoa::EventLoop)

Broken dependencies: perl-RPM2

2012-04-23 Thread buildsys
perl-RPM2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.x86_64 requires librpmio.so.2()(64bit) perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.x86_64 requires librpm.so.2()(64bit) On i386: perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.i686 requires librpmio.so.2

[perl-Package-DeprecationManager] Upstream has dropped Kwalitee test, so drop BR: perl(Test::Kwalitee)

2012-04-23 Thread Paul Howarth
commit e849679cde3809bfa9db269e4ccecddfbe1becb7 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Mon Apr 23 15:10:38 2012 +0100 Upstream has dropped Kwalitee test, so drop BR: perl(Test::Kwalitee) perl-Package-DeprecationManager.spec | 11 --- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7

rawhide report: 20120423 changes

2012-04-23 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Apr 23 08:15:02 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [389-admin] 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48

Re: general problem - Re: Fedora 16 and the 3.3.1-3 kernel

2012-04-23 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.04.2012 05:32, schrieb Chris Murphy: On Apr 22, 2012, at 5:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: no 3.3.1 is the current one, 3.3.2 is current but the whole 3.3 line until now elaborates on the same problem not at each boot, mostly only slower but terrible at all

Re: Fedora 18 Release name voting and Poll for whether to continue naming releases

2012-04-23 Thread Tomas Radej
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:43:41 +0100 Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote: On 23/04/12 14:36, Mark Bidewell wrote: I think it has as much to do with the names as anything else. Ubuntu names are short and easy. But their numbering is crap. 12.04 ? April 2012 I am still not sure

Re: Fedora 18 Release name voting and Poll for whether to continue naming releases

2012-04-23 Thread Frank Murphy
On 23/04/12 14:50, Tomas Radej wrote: But their numbering is crap. 12.04 ? April 2012 My point exactly, name fits better in their scenario. Ah Jules, are you on April or October, tweleve, I believe? Me ducks for cover. ame from...). I didn't know Jules Verne was superman's nemesis.

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #347 - IPA dirsvr seg-fault during system longevity test

2012-04-23 Thread Rich Megginson
Ticket #347 - IPA dirsvr seg-fault during system longevity test https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/347/0001-Ticket-347-IPA-dirsvr-seg-fault-during-system-longev.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-04-23 Thread Miloslav Trmač
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Hi one question before decisions are nailed down http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/firewalld-default An explicit transition is planned after Fedora 18 with dropping support for the static firewall with

Re: Fedora 17 Beta Observations

2012-04-23 Thread Adam Jackson
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 14:02 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 21:32 -0400, Mark Bidewell wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 07:29 -0400, Mark Bidewell wrote: The VM I used had

Reviving podcatcher

2012-04-23 Thread goeran
When I reported a bug on Armangil's podcatcher the other day, I noticed that the package had been orphaned. (Some time ago, actually, but I missed it at the time.) I still use it, so I decided to take over. This is the first time I take over an orphaned package, and I'm slightly confused by the

usrmove breaks on directory name conflict

2012-04-23 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, Last week I tried a preupgrade from F16 to F17 beta. When rebooting into the preupgrade environment, the upgrade failed in usrmove: Make a copy of /mnt/sysimage/usr/bin Merge the copy with /mnt/sysimage/bin cp: cannot overwrite directory /mnt/sysimage/usr/bin.usrmove-new/mkdir with

Re: Fedora 18 Release name voting and Poll for whether to continue naming releases

2012-04-23 Thread Tomas Radej
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:01:56 +0100 Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote: On 23/04/12 14:50, Tomas Radej wrote: But their numbering is crap. 12.04 ? April 2012 My point exactly, name fits better in their scenario. Ah Jules, are you on April or October, tweleve, I believe? Me

Re: Fedora 18 Release name voting and Poll for whether to continue naming releases

2012-04-23 Thread Frank Murphy
On 23/04/12 16:50, Tomas Radej wrote: I think numbering/naming problem is only about the target audience. That's just it, most Fedora non-geek users, use numbering. You see it on the mailing list(s) daily. Rarely do you see a Fedora N by it's name. I didn't know Jules Verne was

Re: Reviving podcatcher

2012-04-23 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:34 AM, goe...@uddeborg.se wrote: When I reported a bug on Armangil's podcatcher the other day, I noticed that the package had been orphaned.  (Some time ago, actually, but I missed it at the time.)  I still use it, so I decided to take over. This is the first time

Re: Fedora 17 Beta Observations

2012-04-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 11:33 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 14:02 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 21:32 -0400, Mark Bidewell wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-19 at

Re: Fedora 18 Release name voting and Poll for whether to continue naming releases

2012-04-23 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 04/23/2012 11:50 AM, Tomas Radej wrote: I think numbering/naming problem is only about the target audience. If Non-geek users tend to stick with names (Karmic Koala, Gingerbread, Belle) and devs/powerusers prefer numbering, what's the problem? I don't see much confusion about naming and

Re: Reviving podcatcher

2012-04-23 Thread goeran
Jon Ciesla: If it's been retired more than two weeks, it'll need a new review. Ah! Looking closer I now see the rawhide branch says deprecated rather than orphaned. That explains it. Thanks! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: usrmove breaks on directory name conflict

2012-04-23 Thread Michal Schmidt
On 04/23/2012 05:45 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: cp: cannot overwrite directory /mnt/sysimage/usr/bin.usrmove-new/mkdir with non-directory Something failed. Move back to the original state. Rebooted back into F16. It looks like the issue was that I had a directory at /usr/bin/mkdir/. No idea how,

Re: usrmove breaks on directory name conflict

2012-04-23 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 09:45 -0600, Daniel Drake wrote: Hi, Last week I tried a preupgrade from F16 to F17 beta. When rebooting into the preupgrade environment, the upgrade failed in usrmove: Make a copy of /mnt/sysimage/usr/bin Merge the copy with /mnt/sysimage/bin cp: cannot

Re: Fedora 17 Beta Observations

2012-04-23 Thread Mark Bidewell
OK, so Mark, it looks like we need you to file a bug on the segfault you hit when trying to run anaconda with the vmwlegacy driver (as long as I'm interpreting the log right). Can you do that and link to the bug? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter:

Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-04-23 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.04.2012 17:32, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/firewalld-default An explicit transition is planned after Fedora 18 with dropping support for the static firewall with

Outage: fedorahosted.org - 2012-04-25 21:00 UTC

2012-04-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Outage: fedorahosted.org - 2012-04-25 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2012-04-25 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 2 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d ' 2012-04-25 21:00 UTC'

Re: GitHub is a terrible upstream

2012-04-23 Thread Patrick Monnerat
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 14:27 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 20:51 -0700, Eric Smith wrote: Corey Richardson wrote: Getting source tarballs from github is a nightmare. See http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-February/148676.html I noticed putting what

Re: Package libsmbclient needs to be rebuild against new samba4-common

2012-04-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kalev Lember wrote: It's your call to make, but I wouldn't base the decision on whether it was in stable updates or updates-testing. There is no expectation of upgrade path for updates-testing. Both are currently enabled by default in F17. And that's where the problem really lies.

Re: GitHub is a terrible upstream

2012-04-23 Thread Andy Grover
On 04/23/2012 06:27 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 20:51 -0700, Eric Smith wrote: #!/bin/sh # usage: tcplay-get-snapshot.sh hash git clone git://github.com/bwalex/tc-play ( cd tc-play \ git archive --format=tar --prefix=tcplay-$1/ $1 \ ) | xz - tcplay-$1.tar.xz We

[389-devel] revised ticket #337 - improve CLEANRUV functionality

2012-04-23 Thread Mark Reynolds
Thanks Rich and Noriko for your comments, changes applied... Thanks, Mark Original Message Subject: [389-devel] please review ticket #337 - improve CLEANRUV functionality Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:05:00 -0400 From: Mark Reynolds marey...@redhat.com Reply-To: 389

Re: usrmove breaks on directory name conflict

2012-04-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Sérgio Basto wrote: you should open a bug report in rhbz , with component preupgrade . Isn't the usrmove script actually part of dracut? Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: GitHub is a terrible upstream

2012-04-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 10:37 -0700, Andy Grover wrote: wget --content-disposition https://github.com/$user/$project/tarball/$tag; lets you download a tarball named $user-$project-$tag-0-$gitsha1.tar.gz. That saves the maintainer from having to document how to generate the tarball, in

Re: GitHub is a terrible upstream

2012-04-23 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 04/23/2012 11:37 AM, Andy Grover wrote: wget --content-disposition https://github.com/$user/$project/tarball/$tag; lets you download a tarball named $user-$project-$tag-0-$gitsha1.tar.gz. That saves the maintainer from having to document how to generate the tarball, in exchange for dealing

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2012-04-23)

2012-04-23 Thread Matthew Garrett
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-04-23) === Meeting started by mjg59 at 17:00:08 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-04-23/fesco.2012-04-23-17.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: GitHub is a terrible upstream

2012-04-23 Thread Andy Grover
On 04/23/2012 10:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 10:37 -0700, Andy Grover wrote: wget --content-disposition https://github.com/$user/$project/tarball/$tag; lets you download a tarball named $user-$project-$tag-0-$gitsha1.tar.gz. That saves the maintainer from having to

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

2012-04-23 Thread Matthew Garrett
After some tweaking, these are now accepted as https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: GitHub is a terrible upstream

2012-04-23 Thread Ville Skyttä
On 2012-04-23 20:56, Orion Poplawski wrote: My problem is I'm wedded to spectool -g and it doesn't use --content-disposition. Would it be safe to have spectool always use that option? No, because the Content-Disposition header from the server may result in changing the downloaded file's name

Recent Rawhide kernels unbootable?

2012-04-23 Thread Jerry James
I haven't been able to boot the last 3 Rawhide kernels, kernel-3.4.0-0.rc3.gitX.1.fc18.x86_64, where X = 2, 3, 4. The kernel with X = 1 boots fine. When I try to boot the other 3, I get dropped into a debug shell with dracut complaining about being unable to find various devices. Today I got

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

2012-04-23 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 04/23/2012 07:00 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: After some tweaking, these are now accepted as https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements Fail to see the reasoning why Anaconda and the Installer team are involved in these requirements care to

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

2012-04-23 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:33:44PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 04/23/2012 07:00 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: After some tweaking, these are now accepted as https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements Fail to see the reasoning why

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

2012-04-23 Thread Bill Nottingham
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) said: On 04/23/2012 07:00 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: After some tweaking, these are now accepted as https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements Fail to see the reasoning why Anaconda and the Installer

Re: Recent Rawhide kernels unbootable?

2012-04-23 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote: I haven't been able to boot the last 3 Rawhide kernels, kernel-3.4.0-0.rc3.gitX.1.fc18.x86_64, where X = 2, 3, 4.  The kernel with X = 1 boots fine.  When I try to boot the other 3, I get dropped into a debug shell with

[perl-AnyEvent] Fix provides

2012-04-23 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
commit 3349c0f34bf8f07b5aa60e4429a2d21d81bc89af Author: Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com Date: Mon Apr 23 21:55:20 2012 +0200 Fix provides perl-AnyEvent.spec |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-AnyEvent.spec b/perl-AnyEvent.spec index

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #19: Convert entryUSN plugin to transaction aware type

2012-04-23 Thread Noriko Hosoi
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/19 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/19/0001-Trac-Ticket-19-Convert-entryUSN-plugin-to-transactio.patch Fix description: * Separated usn_bepreop operations from usn_betxnpreop operations. usn_bepreop_modify and _modrdn add entryusn: # to the

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

2012-04-23 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 04/23/2012 07:42 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: Because if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda and you don't support installing via Anaconda, you're not Fedora. So FESCo is in otherwords saying that other installers and even installing methods ( think like the distribution would be

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

2012-04-23 Thread Jon Ciesla
2012/4/23 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com: On 04/23/2012 07:42 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: Because if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda and you don't support installing via Anaconda, you're not Fedora. So FESCo is in otherwords saying that other installers and even

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

2012-04-23 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On 04/23/2012 12:54 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: So FESCo is in otherwords saying that other installers and even installing methods ( think like the distribution would be flashed to a device in the maybe not to distant future instead of being installed in the traditional sense as we know it

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

2012-04-23 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:54:57PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 04/23/2012 07:42 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: Because if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda and you don't support installing via Anaconda, you're not Fedora. So FESCo is in otherwords saying that other

[perl-AnyEvent] Disable SSL test

2012-04-23 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
commit e58dcc0ba811fc69b59dbd9efca083f806f2d08b Author: Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com Date: Mon Apr 23 22:04:27 2012 +0200 Disable SSL test perl-AnyEvent.spec |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-AnyEvent.spec b/perl-AnyEvent.spec index

Re: GitHub is a terrible upstream

2012-04-23 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 04/23/2012 11:21 AM, Patrick Monnerat wrote: On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 14:27 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 20:51 -0700, Eric Smith wrote: Corey Richardson wrote: Getting source tarballs from github is a nightmare. See

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

2012-04-23 Thread Jared K. Smith
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: Because if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda and you don't support installing via Anaconda, you're not Fedora. Just for the sake of argument, our Amazon EC2 images aren't using Anaconda for installation,

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

2012-04-23 Thread Jared K. Smith
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: Fesco is saying that if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda, you must support installing via Anaconda. It's legitimate for you to also have other install mechanisms, and hardware that's incapable of

Re: GitHub is a terrible upstream

2012-04-23 Thread Josh Stone
On 04/23/2012 01:08 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Nice! I'll note explicitly that this also works with short git tags, so: %global commit bd245c9 Source0: https://github.com/jukka/pcfi/tarball/%{commit}/jukka-pcfi-%{commit}.tar.gz %setup -q -n jukka-pcfi-%{commit} works. Even if

Re: GPT

2012-04-23 Thread Nikos Roussos
On Apr 23, 2012 1:12 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Apr 22, 2012, at 2:55 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote: I already have a GPT partition (from my previous installation), but Anaconda complains that my boot partition should be of type msdos. The only way to proceed seems to be

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

2012-04-23 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Jared K. Smith jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: Because if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda and you don't support installing via Anaconda, you're not Fedora. Just for the

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

2012-04-23 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 04/23/2012 07:45 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: We shouldn't be promoting anything to primary arch that you can't install. Valid point but it still does not explain why FESCo chose to limit that exclusively to Anaconda and the Installer team and their installation methods or lack there of.

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

2012-04-23 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 08:29:59PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 04/23/2012 07:45 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: We shouldn't be promoting anything to primary arch that you can't install. Valid point but it still does not explain why FESCo chose to limit that exclusively to Anaconda and

Re: Recent Rawhide kernels unbootable?

2012-04-23 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 01:34:04PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: I haven't been able to boot the last 3 Rawhide kernels, kernel-3.4.0-0.rc3.gitX.1.fc18.x86_64, where X = 2, 3, 4. The kernel with X = 1 boots fine. When I try to boot the other 3, I get dropped into a debug shell with dracut

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

2012-04-23 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 04/23/2012 08:14 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote: Fesco is saying that if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda, you must support installing via Anaconda. It's legitimate for you to also have other install mechanisms, and hardware that's incapable of supporting Anaconda installs

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

2012-04-23 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 08:57:47PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 04/23/2012 08:14 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote: Fesco is saying that if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda, you must support installing via Anaconda. It's legitimate for you to also have other install

Re: Recent Rawhide kernels unbootable?

2012-04-23 Thread Frank Murphy
On 23/04/12 20:34, Jerry James wrote: I haven't been able to boot the last 3 Rawhide kernels, Have I done something wrong, or are the recent kernels busted? Check your dracut version: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814625 -- Regards, Frank Jack of all, fubars -- devel mailing

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

2012-04-23 Thread Bill Nottingham
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) said: On 04/23/2012 08:14 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote: Fesco is saying that if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda, you must support installing via Anaconda. It's legitimate for you to also have other install mechanisms, and hardware

[389-devel] Please review: Take 2: Ticket #347 - IPA dirsvr seg-fault during system longevity test

2012-04-23 Thread Rich Megginson
Ticket #347 - IPA dirsvr seg-fault during system longevity test https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/347/0001-Ticket-347-IPA-dirsvr-seg-fault-during-system-longev.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Recent Rawhide kernels unbootable?

2012-04-23 Thread Jerry James
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote: Check your dracut version: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814625 That was the problem. Thanks for the bug pointer. After fixing the path to udevd and regenerating the initramfs, the recent kernels are

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

2012-04-23 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 04/23/2012 09:07 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Fedora's about providing a consistent experience wherever possible; this means using consistent interactive installation tools It's not enough to always be using the same tools but those tools need to be consitent in usage as well so for your

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

2012-04-23 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:08:54PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: What is the justification for the need for the seperation in the firstplace? You'd be fine with Fedora m68k? We have the separation because it's not just about scratching your own itch. Each additional supported

Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

2012-04-23 Thread Oron Peled
On Monday, 23 בApril 2012 18:56:23 Reindl Harald wrote: Am 23.04.2012 17:32, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/firewalld-default An explicit transition is planned after Fedora 18

File Net-SSH2-0.42.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

2012-04-23 Thread Petr Šabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-SSH2: c667cb01508eb1e6135afff88a86e4f9 Net-SSH2-0.42.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Net-SSH2] 0.42 bump

2012-04-23 Thread Petr Šabata
commit ff1249b29edb5d10c9eec8fccb2f0f8e694b6e57 Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com Date: Mon Apr 23 11:02:30 2012 +0200 0.42 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Net-SSH2.spec |5 - sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML] BR Pod::Wordlist::hanekomu only if macro is true add missing Data::Dumper dependency

2012-04-23 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit f0a2bd80de6c1e718c6ef71af138b8ec433a1bf6 Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com Date: Mon Apr 23 13:43:29 2012 +0200 BR Pod::Wordlist::hanekomu only if macro is true add missing Data::Dumper dependency perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML.spec |9 - 1 files changed, 8

File YAML-0.81.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by mmaslano

2012-04-23 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-YAML: 1aaddf963786d70518236ae6f6347cad YAML-0.81.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-YAML] update to 0.81 - add BR Data::Dumper

2012-04-23 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 13b616a70ec3193ee2636c4a1227e7aa763d4f89 Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com Date: Mon Apr 23 14:09:23 2012 +0200 update to 0.81 - add BR Data::Dumper .gitignore |1 + perl-YAML.spec |9 +++-- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+),

[perl-YAML/f17] (2 commits) ...Fix build and runtime dependencies

2012-04-23 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes: 13b616a... update to 0.81 - add BR Data::Dumper (*) 48fd123... Fix build and runtime dependencies (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing

[perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML] Data::Dumper is not really needed, dependencies must be fixed in YAML

2012-04-23 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 658f792986f79955d94d45bf58ffabef54227879 Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com Date: Mon Apr 23 14:32:18 2012 +0200 Data::Dumper is not really needed, dependencies must be fixed in YAML perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML.spec |6 -- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Re: [perl-YAML] Fix build and runtime dependencies

2012-04-23 Thread Petr Pisar
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:20:30PM +, Paul Howarth wrote: commit 48fd123ff83d853a4db030374bda66e1b84cae0f Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Mon Apr 23 13:11:31 2012 +0100 Fix build and runtime dependencies That's much better however I think perl(lib) is still

  1   2   >