EPEL Fedora 5 updates-testing report

2013-10-31 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 557 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5 71 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5 47

Fatal flaw in the udev paradigm?

2013-10-31 Thread rrankin
I have run into an issue which seems to call into question the udev paradigm for USB devices. In my case it has ramifications in ModemManager and gpsd packages, but I see it as a fundamental problem with udev which is in all current versions of Fedora. My USB GPS is a BU-353 which uses a pl2303

Re: Fatal flaw in the udev paradigm?

2013-10-31 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Jeu 31 octobre 2013 07:03, rran...@ihug.com.au a écrit : I have run into an issue which seems to call into question the udev paradigm for USB devices. It's not a fatal flaw it's broken hardware (and autodetection broken by device manufacturers not bothering to replace OEM id with their own

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

2013-10-31 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Hi, Anyway what makes xdg specs a total wreakage is the way they've replaced dotfiles with other dotfiles only to create prettyfied localized symlinks à la windows (a bad case of over-engineering and aping another os without understanding drawbacks) Had they specified a ~/xdg/ root, with a

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

2013-10-31 Thread drago01
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: Hi, Anyway what makes xdg specs a total wreakage is the way they've replaced dotfiles with other dotfiles only to create prettyfied localized symlinks That's incorrect. The prettyfied localized symlinks are

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

2013-10-31 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 10:12 +0100, drago01 wrote: As for why they are hidden (and always have been) is because you do not want to bother the user with them most of the time. That being said, they could have not started by a ., but still be hidden by the GUI file managers like Nautilus (for

Re: Fatal flaw in the udev paradigm?

2013-10-31 Thread Tom Hughes
On 31/10/13 08:42, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Jeu 31 octobre 2013 07:03, rran...@ihug.com.au a écrit : I have run into an issue which seems to call into question the udev paradigm for USB devices. It's not a fatal flaw it's broken hardware (and autodetection broken by device manufacturers not

Re: Fatal flaw in the udev paradigm?

2013-10-31 Thread Tom Hughes
On 31/10/13 09:56, Tom Hughes wrote: so in short this device should be added to the greylist if it isn't there already, and then it will only be probed when such a probe is explicitly requested. and the PL2303 is indeed in the greylist:

openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Reindl Harald
currently on a x86_64 system distro-sync to F19 is broken i saw the same in F18 with updates-testing enabled on a machine with i686 packages some days ago and download the openssl packages for both archs from koji and doing a yum localupdate worked fine Error: Package:

[perl-Authen-Radius] Created tag perl-Authen-Radius-0.23-1.fc21

2013-10-31 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Authen-Radius-0.23-1.fc21' was created pointing to: 131534e... Update to 0.23 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting #2, Thursday, October 31 @ 17:00 UTC

2013-10-31 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 20 Beta. This is the second attempt to release Fedora 20 Beta. Currently, we're waiting for possible RC1 compose. Thursday, October 31, 2013 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10

Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-10-31 Thread Tim Lauridsen
I have tested gnome-software to see the current state, compaired to gpk in F19, there is a lot stuff there cant be done. 1. You cant install backgrounds / icons 2. Not all application found in the menu, can be found under installed, you can search for them and find them, but cant remove them (ex.

Taskbot: TAP vs Subunit

2013-10-31 Thread Josef Skladanka
Tim (and of course the rest of the gang ;)), During our chat with Tim, we agreed that we'd really like to use some standardized 'output format' for the tests in Taskbot, to be a bit more programming-language/results-store-implementation agnostic. We knew about two options - TAP

Broken dependencies: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML

2013-10-31 Thread buildsys
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-Padre

2013-10-31 Thread buildsys
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires

Broken dependencies: perl-BerkeleyDB

2013-10-31 Thread buildsys
perl-BerkeleyDB has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.x86_64 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21 On i386: perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.i686 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21 On armhfp: perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libdb = 0:5.3.21

Broken dependencies: perl-PDL

2013-10-31 Thread buildsys
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)

Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr

2013-10-31 Thread buildsys
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: slic3r

2013-10-31 Thread buildsys
slic3r has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On i386: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On armhfp: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-10-31 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 12:13 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote: I have tested gnome-software to see the current state, compaired to gpk in F19, there is a lot stuff there cant be done. 1. You cant install backgrounds / icons It is an application installer, first and foremost. Installing

Re: Fatal flaw in the udev paradigm?

2013-10-31 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:52:18 +0100, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote: I might be missing something, but to me that seems just life with a generic transport that doesn't have built-in identification of connected devices. This applies to RS232 (your case), but also to the (classic)

F-20 Branched report: 20131031 changes

2013-10-31 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Thu Oct 31 09:15:03 UTC 2013 Broken deps for armhfp -- [blueman] blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server = 0:0.4.3 blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp [bwm-ng]

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:12:41 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: currently on a x86_64 system distro-sync to F19 is broken i saw the same in F18 with updates-testing enabled on a machine with i686 packages some days ago and download the openssl packages for both archs from koji and doing a yum

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 31.10.2013 13:49, schrieb Michael Schwendt: On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:12:41 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: currently on a x86_64 system distro-sync to F19 is broken i saw the same in F18 with updates-testing enabled on a machine with i686 packages some days ago and download the openssl

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-10-31 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.comwrote: On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 12:13 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote: I have tested gnome-software to see the current state, compaired to gpk in F19, there is a lot stuff there cant be done. 1. You cant install backgrounds /

[perl-Types-Serialiser] Created tag perl-Types-Serialiser-0.03-2.fc18

2013-10-31 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Types-Serialiser-0.03-2.fc18' was created pointing to: ef9e8ef... Initial import (perl-Types-Serialiser-0.03-2) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Types-Serialiser] Created tag perl-Types-Serialiser-0.03-2.fc21

2013-10-31 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Types-Serialiser-0.03-2.fc21' was created pointing to: ef9e8ef... Initial import (perl-Types-Serialiser-0.03-2) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Types-Serialiser] Created tag perl-Types-Serialiser-0.03-2.el6

2013-10-31 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Types-Serialiser-0.03-2.el6' was created pointing to: ef9e8ef... Initial import (perl-Types-Serialiser-0.03-2) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr

2013-10-31 Thread buildsys
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp:

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-10-31 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 14:31 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 12:13 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote: I have tested gnome-software to see the current state, compaired to

Re: Fatal flaw in the udev paradigm?

2013-10-31 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, rran...@ihug.com.au rran...@ihug.com.au said: My USB GPS is a BU-353 which uses a pl2303 USB-Serial Controller (idVendor=067b, idProduct=2303). However, bugzilla report 878737 indicates this same interface chip is used on other devices such as RS232-USB adapters. The PL2303

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:56:53 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: currently on a x86_64 system distro-sync to F19 is broken i saw the same in F18 with updates-testing enabled on a machine with i686 packages some days ago and download the openssl packages for both archs from koji and doing a yum

Re: Taskbot: TAP vs Subunit

2013-10-31 Thread Kamil Paral
= TAP = TAP is not unittest-specific, and is human-readable plaintext format. It also has just PASS/FAIL logic, but there is a possibility to add YAML 'metadata' to any result (since TAP v. 13). The real issue with TAP is Python support. There is a TAP-consumer library created as an

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 31.10.2013 16:14, schrieb Michael Schwendt: On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:56:53 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: currently on a x86_64 system distro-sync to F19 is broken i saw the same in F18 with updates-testing enabled on a machine with i686 packages some days ago and download the openssl packages

Re: Fatal flaw in the udev paradigm?

2013-10-31 Thread DJ Delorie
Can you wildcard the greylist so that modemmanager *never* runs? I haven't used a modem in decades but MM keeps mucking with all my serial-connected toys. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

[389-devel] lib389: cleanup __init__

2013-10-31 Thread Roberto Polli
Hi @all, I started investigating in mocking with fakeldap, and it seems an easy and viable way of adding unittests. A main issue is the DSAdmin.__init__ complexity. I thought - a long time ago actually - to remove from DSAdmin all cached references to backends, suffixes and configuration. If

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Andre Robatino
Michael Schwendt mschwendt at gmail.com writes: Skype is not included with Fedora. Skype does not (and cannot) influence which packages are multilib'ed when the repos are composed. Skype 32-bit doesn't depend on openssl. What on your machine depends on 32-bit openssl and not openssl-libs? In

Re: Taskbot: TAP vs Subunit

2013-10-31 Thread Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
On 10/31/2013 01:23 PM, Kamil Paral wrote: = TAP = TAP is not unittest-specific, and is human-readable plaintext format. It also has just PASS/FAIL logic, but there is a possibility to add YAML 'metadata' to any result (since TAP v. 13). The real issue with TAP is Python support. There is a

Re: [fedora-arm] Announcing Fedora 19 ARM remix for Allwinner SOCs release 3

2013-10-31 Thread Jozef Mlich
On Sun, 2013-10-13 at 23:29 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: I'm very happy to announce the third release (r3) of my Fedora 19 ARM remix images for Allwinner A10, A10s, A13 and A20 based devices. This release is based on the official Fedora 19 Final for ARM images, with u-boot and kernel(s) from

Re: Taskbot: TAP vs Subunit

2013-10-31 Thread Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
On 10/31/2013 01:23 PM, Kamil Paral wrote: = TAP = TAP is not unittest-specific, and is human-readable plaintext format. It also has just PASS/FAIL logic, but there is a possibility to add YAML 'metadata' to any result (since TAP v. 13). The real issue with TAP is Python support. There is a

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:29:18 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: Why did you have openssl.i686 installed on x86_64 to begin with? You have messed up your installation. :-( Have you use rpm -Uvh instead of rpm -Fvh? Or why have you installed openssl.i686? the machine has a long history Well,

Re: [389-devel] lib389: cleanup __init__

2013-10-31 Thread Rich Megginson
On 10/31/2013 09:58 AM, Roberto Polli wrote: Hi @all, I started investigating in mocking with fakeldap, and it seems an easy and viable way of adding unittests. A main issue is the DSAdmin.__init__ complexity. I thought - a long time ago actually - to remove from DSAdmin all cached references

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:10:02 + (UTC), Andre Robatino wrote: In F16, when I had 32-bit packages (namely Skype and Fedora's wine) installed, I had both openssl.i686 and openssl.x86_64 installed, so Indeed. Up to F17, but not anymore since F18:

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 17:32 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: But watch this on F20 x86_64: # repoquery --releasever=17 --exactdeps --whatrequires 'openssl(x86-32)' openssl-devel-1:1.0.0i-1.fc17.i686 openssl-devel-1:1.0.0k-1.fc17.i686 So, openssl-devel.i686 required openssl.i686

Re: [389-devel] lib389: cleanup __init__

2013-10-31 Thread Roberto Polli
Hi Rich, On Thursday 31 October 2013 10:32:13 Rich Megginson wrote: I thought - a long time ago actually - to remove from DSAdmin all cached references to backends, suffixes and configuration. Part of the complexity is due to trying to keep data across a restart I agree with credential

Re: [389-devel] lib389: cleanup __init__

2013-10-31 Thread Rich Megginson
On 10/31/2013 10:35 AM, Roberto Polli wrote: Hi Rich, On Thursday 31 October 2013 10:32:13 Rich Megginson wrote: I thought - a long time ago actually - to remove from DSAdmin all cached references to backends, suffixes and configuration. Part of the complexity is due to trying to keep data

Re: [389-devel] lib389: cleanup __init__

2013-10-31 Thread Roberto Polli
On Thursday 31 October 2013 10:40:25 Rich Megginson wrote: Are all the __initPart2() attributes essential? No. You could do lazy evaluation of those fields. For example, instead of having a .dbdir field, have a .getdbdir() member that would do an ldapsearch if .dbdir is None. That's good.

Re: Fatal flaw in the udev paradigm?

2013-10-31 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 10/31/2013 02:03 AM, rran...@ihug.com.au wrote: I have run into an issue which seems to call into question the udev paradigm for USB devices. In my case it has ramifications in ModemManager and gpsd packages, but I see it as a fundamental problem with udev which is in all current versions

Re: Fatal flaw in the udev paradigm?

2013-10-31 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 11:49 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: Can you wildcard the greylist so that modemmanager *never* runs? I haven't used a modem in decades but MM keeps mucking with all my serial-connected toys. You can do anything you want with the udev rules. Just put them in

Re: Fatal flaw in the udev paradigm?

2013-10-31 Thread DJ Delorie
But better yet, mind sharing which toys you have so we can update the black/greylists as appropriate? I make them myself using FTDI chips, usually, and they talk plain RS-232 using terminal emulators and such: http://www.delorie.com/electronics/ I also get a lot of eval boards with

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 31.10.2013 17:27, schrieb Michael Schwendt: On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:29:18 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: Why did you have openssl.i686 installed on x86_64 to begin with? You have messed up your installation. :-( Have you use rpm -Uvh instead of rpm -Fvh? Or why have you installed

Re: Fatal flaw in the udev paradigm?

2013-10-31 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 12:50 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: On 10/31/2013 02:03 AM, rran...@ihug.com.au wrote: I have run into an issue which seems to call into question the udev paradigm for USB devices. In my case it has ramifications in ModemManager and gpsd packages, but I see it as a

Re: Taskbot: TAP vs Subunit

2013-10-31 Thread Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
On 10/31/2013 02:27 PM, Josef Skladanka wrote: Lucas, do you use any library for producing TAP format? No, at least not in the sense of an external project. Producing TAP in the client is an autotest specific implementation. It is the TAPReport() object defined in:

Re: Taskbot: TAP vs Subunit

2013-10-31 Thread Tim Flink
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:17:03 -0400 (EDT) Josef Skladanka jskla...@redhat.com wrote: Bah, just realized this only went to Josef the first time I sent it. He gets two copies! Tim (and of course the rest of the gang ;)), During our chat with Tim, we agreed that we'd really like to use some

Re: Fatal flaw in the udev paradigm?

2013-10-31 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 13:08 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: But better yet, mind sharing which toys you have so we can update the black/greylists as appropriate? I make them myself using FTDI chips, usually, and they talk plain RS-232 using terminal emulators and such:

Re: Canonical copy of config.guess/config.sub

2013-10-31 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:59:37 +0200 Phil Knirsch pknir...@redhat.com escribió: On 10/25/2013 12:07 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: W dniu 22.10.2013 17:26, Ralf Corsepius pisze: Also, automake-based projects receive the versions bundled with

Re: Fedora search

2013-10-31 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:29:25 -0500 Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com escribió: Frankie Onuonga wrote: I am writing in regards to something I had written about two months ago. This in regards to the search engine.

[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Beta to slip by one week

2013-10-31 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
Today at Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip Fedora 20 Beta release by one week due to unresolved blocker bugs not being fixed by the time of meeting. Due to constrained schedule, shorter slip was considered but with limited QA resources availability, it was decided to slip for a full week.

Packages have proxy word.

2013-10-31 Thread مصعب الزعبي
بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم Hi, The result of updating Fedora by yum is fail !! When any package have proxy word marked to (install or update) , error message will appear with http 403 error forbidden. In my country Syria (maybe others) all URLs have proxy word are forbidden and couldn't open

ModemManager and generic USB hardware (was: Fatal flaw in the udev paradigm?)

2013-10-31 Thread Oron Peled
On Thursday 31 October 2013 12:00:10 Dan Williams wrote: If you're on a server, and that server does not have any SMS me when you're down functionality, then you may not want ModemManager installed there. +1 But also in other cases, like the following: * Software/hardware developer

Re: Packages have proxy word.

2013-10-31 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, Renaming packages it is not user friendly thing because of few reasons: - there's some documentation/blog posts etc that use these names - this will break installation scripts - poeple who use these packages are familiar with these names What if your country also ban proxies word?

RE: Packages have proxy word.

2013-10-31 Thread مصعب الزعبي
Proxies not banned. Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 00:20:35 +0100 Subject: Re: Packages have proxy word. From: mkkp...@gmail.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Hi, Renaming packages it is not user friendly thing because of few reasons: - there's some documentation/blog posts etc that use these names

Re: Packages have proxy word.

2013-10-31 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 01:08:33AM +0200, مصعب الزعبي wrote: بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم Hi, The result of updating Fedora by yum is fail !! When any package have proxy word marked to (install or update) , error message will appear with http 403 error forbidden. In my country Syria

Re: Packages have proxy word.

2013-10-31 Thread Pete Travis
On Oct 31, 2013 6:08 PM, مصعب الزعبي moc...@hotmail.com wrote: بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم Hi, The result of updating Fedora by yum is fail !! When any package have proxy word marked to (install or update) , error message will appear with http 403 error forbidden. In my country Syria (maybe

Re: Packages have proxy word.

2013-10-31 Thread Christopher Meng
Censorship? I think we have no reason to change the package name because of some governments‘ being evil. Have you tried opening a ssh tunnel proxy for firewall breaking? Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora

Fedora engineering manager

2013-10-31 Thread Paul W. Frields
Hi Fedora folks, Hopefully some of you know me, possibly as a previous Fedora Project Leader at Red Hat. If you don't, then salutations, and please feel free to check out my Fedora wiki page[1] for my background. :-) As of next Monday, I'll be the reporting manager for Fedora Engineering team

Re: Fedora engineering manager

2013-10-31 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:42:52 -0400 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com escribió: Hi Fedora folks, Hopefully some of you know me, possibly as a previous Fedora Project Leader at Red Hat. If you don't, then salutations, and please feel free to

Re: Fedora engineering manager

2013-10-31 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:47:36PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: El Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:42:52 -0400 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com escribió: Hi Fedora folks, Hopefully some of you know me, possibly as a previous Fedora Project Leader at Red Hat. If you don't, then salutations, and

Re: Fedora search

2013-10-31 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Wed, 30 Oct, 2013 at 19:29:25 GMT, Michael Cronenworth wrote: What about using a custom Google search engine? https://www.google.com/cse/ Google is having more and more privacy issues lately. Why not use DuckDuckGo and write a 'bang' search for fedora sites? !fedora-guidelines,

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Kevin Kofler
Reindl Harald wrote: but sadly you can't do Requires: package.x86_64 explicitly You can actually: Requires: openssl(x86-64) See also the %{_isa} macro. http://www.rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/ArchDependencies (This is also what Michael Schwendt's repoquery invocation in this thread checked for.)

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-10-31 Thread Kevin Kofler
Matthias Clasen wrote: On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 14:31 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote: Look at System - File Tools - Caja-actions configuration tool Get the cinnamon guys to fork the nautilus appdata ? I'm sure it will only need minor adjustments... :-) Caja is actually from MATE, Cinnamon has

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-10-31 Thread Kevin Kofler
Matthias Clasen wrote: It is an application installer, first and foremost. Installing backgrounds/icons/themes is not a priority. Having as the only GUI package management application on your spin one that does not even offer all packages is very broken. We have a notion of 'core app' - for

Re: rawhide report: 20131026 changes

2013-10-31 Thread Kevin Kofler
Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: New package: lpf-0-8.ff50a5b.fc21 Local package factory - build non-redistributable rpms New package: lpf-spotify-client-0.9.4.183.g644e24e.428-2.fc21 Spotify music player native client package bootstrap WTF???

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-10-31 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 14:31 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote: I know Richard has pushed hard to get appdata for apps, but it do help the end user, if lot of apps in gnome-software dont have any descriptions. Look at System - File Tools - Caja-actions configuration tool How should an end

Re: Fedora Working Groups: Call for Self-Nominations

2013-10-31 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bill Nottingham wrote: And I would argue that having the user interface swing wildly in design implementation based on the current composition of an elected board that is refreshed in part every six months is not the sort of situation that Fedora would want to be in anyway. That's a very

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-10-31 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 04:19 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Having as the only GUI package management application on your spin one that does not even offer all packages is very broken. It isn't a *package* management application. It's an *application* management application, ie., it only handles

Re: Fedora search

2013-10-31 Thread Frankie Onuonga
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 30 Oct, 2013 at 19:29:25 GMT, Michael Cronenworth wrote: What about using a custom Google search engine? https://www.google.com/cse/ Google is having more and more privacy issues lately. Why not use DuckDuckGo

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-10-31 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote: It isn't a *package* management application. It's an *application* management application, ie., it only handles packages that are desktop applications (and therefore have desktop files associated with them). I'm

File DateTime-Format-DBI-0.041.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

2013-10-31 Thread Petr Šabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime-Format-DBI: 135955e52b3a3083ec3b4e0d7bd4de5d DateTime-Format-DBI-0.041.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

File ctstream-9 uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2013-10-31 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for ctstream: 7949c8947140894ceb656fc413d00fec ctstream-9 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[ctstream] Version 9 bump

2013-10-31 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 4aa0fbc6827b0b85bcb52895c1440656466f867f Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu Oct 31 07:49:24 2013 +0100 Version 9 bump .gitignore|1 + ctstream.spec |7 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[Bug 1024821] ctstream-9 is available

2013-10-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024821 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- This is a bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[perl-DateTime-Format-DBI] 0.041 bump

2013-10-31 Thread Petr Šabata
commit 6f6050eecfbed9396b44530d87644b635f92f112 Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com Date: Thu Oct 31 15:49:59 2013 +0900 0.041 bump .gitignore|1 + perl-DateTime-Format-DBI.spec | 32 ++-- sources |2 +- 3

[ctstream/f20] Version 9 bump

2013-10-31 Thread Petr Pisar
Summary of changes: 4aa0fbc... Version 9 bump (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[ctstream/f19] Version 9 bump

2013-10-31 Thread Petr Pisar
commit a389770d5012aa0640d674801e138509cee834ee Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu Oct 31 07:49:24 2013 +0100 Version 9 bump .gitignore|1 + ctstream.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[Bug 1022676] perl-DateTime-Format-DBI-0.041 is available

2013-10-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022676 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[ctstream/f18] Version 9 bump

2013-10-31 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 65d8f35de06fd0ebf331b5bd5d6cbd2b7d19ac2c Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu Oct 31 07:49:24 2013 +0100 Version 9 bump .gitignore|1 + ctstream.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[Bug 1024821] ctstream-9 is available

2013-10-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024821 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1024821] ctstream-9 is available

2013-10-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024821 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ctstream-9-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ctstream-9-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1024821] ctstream-9 is available

2013-10-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024821 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ctstream-9-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ctstream-9-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1024821] ctstream-9 is available

2013-10-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024821 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ctstream-9-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ctstream-9-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1022682] perl-X11-Protocol-Other-27 is available

2013-10-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022682 Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

File Perl-Critic-Deprecated-1.119.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2013-10-31 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated: fe789d45277b769a244da8d3b5f7b00b Perl-Critic-Deprecated-1.119.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated] 1.119 bump

2013-10-31 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 3fa6a778ad9e5559a85a44df470a555a9955fb82 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu Oct 31 08:31:01 2013 +0100 1.119 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated.spec |7 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7

[perl-DateTime-Format-DBI] Correct iconv BR

2013-10-31 Thread Petr Šabata
commit 852d9874d3c579540750ff402c048fd7b021a000 Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com Date: Thu Oct 31 16:32:45 2013 +0900 Correct iconv BR perl-DateTime-Format-DBI.spec |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-DateTime-Format-DBI.spec

File Perl-Critic-More-1.003.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2013-10-31 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic-More: 00deaf3d49835ae12f59ccd2fcea9045 Perl-Critic-More-1.003.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Perl-Critic-More] Remove unneeded Perl-Critic-More-1.000-Miscellanea::RequireRcsKeywords.patch

2013-10-31 Thread Petr Pisar
commit c2f8861e72e7a722bcbba8727adb33d8e7dfed3a Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu Oct 31 08:33:55 2013 +0100 Remove unneeded Perl-Critic-More-1.000-Miscellanea::RequireRcsKeywords.patch ...ore-1.000-Miscellanea::RequireRcsKeywords.patch | 236 1 files

[perl-Perl-Critic-More] 1.003 bump

2013-10-31 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 852a5ef3d669041f8b75eb67fca423f1c77b5489 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu Oct 31 08:37:01 2013 +0100 1.003 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Perl-Critic-More.spec |5 - sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2

[Bug 1024894] perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated-1.119 is available

2013-10-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024894 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1024896] perl-Perl-Critic-More-1.003 is available

2013-10-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024896 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

  1   2   >