Re: pl license change

2013-12-09 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2013-12-06, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Petr Pisar wrote: On 2013-12-04, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Petr Pisar wrote: [snip] and GPLv2 and GPLv3+. Huh? WTF is upstream smoking there? Upstream releases a tar ball bundling a lot of subprojects. Thus the

Re: Fedora ARM Status Meeting 2013-12-04

2013-12-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net wrote: On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 07:28:09 PM Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net wrote: On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 07:11:40 PM Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, Dec 4, 2013

Unresponsive maintainers of dependent packages

2013-12-09 Thread Tomas Hozza
Hi. Before my question, little bit of introduction: --- I'm the maintainer of 'openobex' package (library) which was rebased to the latest version in rawhide on the end of September this year. The rebase was announced 2 weeks in advance on fedora-devel

F-20 Branched report: 20131209 changes

2013-12-09 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Mon Dec 9 07:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for armhfp -- [avro] avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client [blueman]

rawhide report: 20131209 changes

2013-12-09 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Dec 9 05:15:07 UTC 2013 Broken deps for i386 -- [LuxRender] LuxRender-1.0-16.fc21.i686 requires libImath-2_0.so.10 LuxRender-1.0-16.fc21.i686 requires libIlmThread-2_0.so.10

Mass rebuild miss-tagged?

2013-12-09 Thread Michael J Gruber
I got a message from buildsys about an unsuccessful tag which I hadn't initiated - probably left over bits from the F20 mass rebuild. Should I simply (re)build on master to try abd deal with that? Since fedpkg has no scratch-head command I'll settle for scratch-build next... Michael

Re: Mass rebuild miss-tagged?

2013-12-09 Thread Peter Robinson
Was it from koji.fedoraproject, or arm.koji.fedoraproject? Peter On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Michael J Gruber m...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I got a message from buildsys about an unsuccessful tag which I hadn't initiated - probably left over bits from the F20 mass rebuild. Should I

Re: Mass rebuild miss-tagged?

2013-12-09 Thread Michael J Gruber
Peter Robinson venit, vidit, dixit 09.12.2013 14:19: Was it from koji.fedoraproject, or arm.koji.fedoraproject? Peter There were two mails with identical content: the first from buildsys@fp.o to ausil@fp.o and myself the second from buildsys@fp.o to probinso@fp.o, arm-bu...@lists.fp.o and

[Owner-change] Fedora packages ownership change

2013-12-09 Thread nobody
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours === 1 packages were orphaned giflib [devel,f18,f19,f20] was orphaned by robert Library for manipulating GIF format image files

Re: FTBFS if -Werror=format-security flag is used

2013-12-09 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 12/06/2013 09:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: printf(string) is legitimate C, forcing printf(%s, string) is just silly. My apologies for being repetitive, but the original point is that printf(string) is insecure unless you can guarantee that you control 'string' now and forever. Also, %s

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 47622 - Automember betxnpreoperation - transaction not aborted when group entry does not exist

2013-12-09 Thread Mark Reynolds
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47622 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47622/0001-Ticket-47622-Automember-betxnpreoperation-transactio.patch -- Mark Reynolds 389 Development Team Red Hat, Inc mreyno...@redhat.com -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FTBFS if -Werror=format-security flag is used

2013-12-09 Thread Adam Jackson
On Sun, 2013-12-08 at 01:17 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Michael scherer wrote: There is enough software not building anymore and dropped after mass rebuild to show that such problem are not really so uncommon. … the difference is that in this case, the offending code is actually perfectly

Re: FTBFS if -Werror=format-security flag is used

2013-12-09 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/09/2013 03:33 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: On 12/06/2013 09:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: printf(string) is legitimate C, forcing printf(%s, string) is just silly. My apologies for being repetitive, but the original point is that printf(string) is insecure unless you can guarantee

Re: FTBFS if -Werror=format-security flag is used

2013-12-09 Thread Les Howell
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 15:59 -0700, Rich Megginson wrote: On 12/09/2013 03:33 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: On 12/06/2013 09:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: printf(string) is legitimate C, forcing printf(%s, string) is just silly. My apologies for being repetitive, but the

Re: FTBFS if -Werror=format-security flag is used

2013-12-09 Thread Mateusz Marzantowicz
On 10.12.2013 00:01, Les Howell wrote: On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 15:59 -0700, Rich Megginson wrote: On 12/09/2013 03:33 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: On 12/06/2013 09:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: printf(string) is legitimate C, forcing printf(%s, string) is just silly. My apologies for being

Re: FTBFS if -Werror=format-security flag is used

2013-12-09 Thread Tom Hughes
On 09/12/13 23:01, Les Howell wrote: unless something has changed recently fputs and puts just like gets and fgets have been deprecated and are discouraged due to potential security issues. Nonsense. The reason gets is dangerous is because it doesn't take a buffer size so will continue

Re: FTBFS if -Werror=format-security flag is used

2013-12-09 Thread Björn Persson
Les Howell wrote: printf(%s, string) is inefficient. In this case, it would be better to use puts/fputs. unless something has changed recently fputs and puts just like gets and fgets have been deprecated and are discouraged due to potential security issues. gets is horribly insecure

Re: Mass rebuild miss-tagged?

2013-12-09 Thread Dennis Gilmore
Ignore that it was due to something I was looking at. it needs no action from anyone. Dennis -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Claiming ownership of fish (and sponsor needed)

2013-12-09 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
Hi all- I'd like to claim ownership of the 'fish' package (i.e. the fish shell). The (re-)review request is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974852 This is my first package, so I'll need a sponsor, too. Thanks, Andy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FTBFS if -Werror=format-security flag is used

2013-12-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Jackson wrote: Allow me to suggest something that really shouldn't be controversial, but probably is, because this is the internet: standards compliance for its own sake is not actually worthwhile. Tell that to the GCC (especially g++) developers who keep breaking backwards compatibility

Re: Unresponsive package maintainer policy change proposal

2013-12-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 13:20 +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote: On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 11:44:47AM +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: Hello all, I think this kind of bug should not be filled against the single package, but something like against infrastructure. Also it should block all bugs assigned

Re: FTBFS if -Werror=format-security flag is used

2013-12-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 03:01:55PM -0800, Les Howell wrote: unless something has changed recently fputs and puts just like gets and fgets have been deprecated and are discouraged due to potential security issues. That is wrong. Only gets is deprecated (removed in C11, obsolescent in POSIX

[Bug 1039708] perl-DateTime-1.04 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039708 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Agenda for today's Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2013-12-10)

2013-12-09 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
WG meeting will be today at 13:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode. == Next Steps == - PRD - based on discussion on env-and-stacks mailing list (some discussion on pad: http://piratepad.net/PwUiH4MEPR) == Open Floor == -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr

2013-12-09 Thread buildsys
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr

2013-12-09 Thread buildsys
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp:

File Fennec-2.012.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2013-12-09 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Fennec: 71ecafd843037bc6b48e5b7ba3f84bbc Fennec-2.012.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Fennec] Update to 2.012

2013-12-09 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 086f923085cfbe2c526e6e6b9d707a229810c597 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Mon Dec 9 11:21:08 2013 + Update to 2.012 - New upstream release 2.012 - Fix around_all - Documentation fixes perl-Fennec.spec |7 ++- sources |2 +-

[perl-Fennec] Created tag perl-Fennec-2.012-1.fc21

2013-12-09 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Fennec-2.012-1.fc21' was created pointing to: 086f923... Update to 2.012 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1039708] New: perl-DateTime-1.04 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039708 Bug ID: 1039708 Summary: perl-DateTime-1.04 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DateTime Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1039710] New: perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default-1.05 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039710 Bug ID: 1039710 Summary: perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default-1.05 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1039712] New: perl-Gnome2-1.045 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039712 Bug ID: 1039712 Summary: perl-Gnome2-1.045 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Gnome2 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1021207] perl-Gtk3-0.015 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021207 Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1039713] New: perl-Math-PlanePath-112 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039713 Bug ID: 1039713 Summary: perl-Math-PlanePath-112 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Math-PlanePath Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1039715] New: perl-Module-Starter-1.62 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039715 Bug ID: 1039715 Summary: perl-Module-Starter-1.62 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Module-Starter Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1039717] New: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2-0.24 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039717 Bug ID: 1039717 Summary: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2-0.24 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1039719] New: perl-POE-1.358 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039719 Bug ID: 1039719 Summary: perl-POE-1.358 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-POE Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: psab...@redhat.com

[Bug 1016253] perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016253 Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1021855] perl-Shipwright-2.4.37 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021855 Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

File Rose-DateTime-0.540.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by wfp

2013-12-09 Thread Bill Pemberton
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Rose-DateTime: dd59316348ecf9827d432369242547bf Rose-DateTime-0.540.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Rose-DateTime] update to version 0.540

2013-12-09 Thread Bill Pemberton
commit aa20b216c707e9a4a826eaed590ccd98005fb271 Author: Bill Pemberton wf...@worldbroken.com Date: Mon Dec 9 16:18:40 2013 -0500 update to version 0.540 Handle object return value from DateTime-DefaultLocale .gitignore |1 + perl-Rose-DateTime.spec |6 +-

[perl-Rose-DateTime/f20] (2 commits) ...update to version 0.540

2013-12-09 Thread Bill Pemberton
Summary of changes: 1173135... Update to version 0.539 (*) aa20b21... update to version 0.540 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[perl-Rose-DateTime/f19] (4 commits) ...update to version 0.540

2013-12-09 Thread Bill Pemberton
Summary of changes: 099be47... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*) 33aab1a... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*) 1173135... Update to version 0.539 (*) aa20b21... update to version 0.540 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora

[perl-Rose-DateTime/el6] (6 commits) ...update to version 0.540

2013-12-09 Thread Bill Pemberton
Summary of changes: f665890... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass (*) e02844a... update to version 0.538 (*) 099be47... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*) 33aab1a... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*) 1173135... Update to version 0.539 (*)

[Bug 1016253] perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016253 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540-1.el6 -- You are

[Bug 1038513] perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.809 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038513 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540-1.fc20 -- You are

[Bug 1016253] perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016253 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540-1.fc19 -- You are

[Bug 1016253] perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016253 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540-1.fc20 -- You are

[Bug 1035761] Upgrade to new upstream version

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035761 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Net-STOMP-Client-2.2-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1035760] Upgrade to new upstream version

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035760 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Config-Validator-1.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1035761] Upgrade to new upstream version

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035761 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Net-STOMP-Client-2.2-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1035760] Upgrade to new upstream version

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035760 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Config-Validator-1.1-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

File DateTime-1.04.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2013-12-09 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime: f8bbaaec1c115abd0301e2caa02d6d40 DateTime-1.04.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-DateTime] 1.04 bump

2013-12-09 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 28b99ffc7fb1d81c300455e75dd5b43e1ce0cef8 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Tue Dec 10 08:06:25 2013 +0100 1.04 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-DateTime.spec | 11 --- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- diff

[Bug 1039708] perl-DateTime-1.04 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039708 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- This is a bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[perl-DateTime/f20] 1.04 bump

2013-12-09 Thread Petr Pisar
Summary of changes: 28b99ff... 1.04 bump (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-DateTime/f19] 1.04 bump

2013-12-09 Thread Petr Pisar
commit afc18b86f8515dac7c986bef2def2d69f45d4b70 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Tue Dec 10 08:06:25 2013 +0100 1.04 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-DateTime.spec |9 +++-- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff

[perl-DateTime/f18] 1.04 bump

2013-12-09 Thread Petr Pisar
commit d83ee6a090fafefcc3863347beee46d570e65e84 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Tue Dec 10 08:06:25 2013 +0100 1.04 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-DateTime.spec |9 +++-- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff

[Bug 1039708] perl-DateTime-1.04 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039708 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1039708] perl-DateTime-1.04 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039708 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-DateTime-1.04-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-1.04-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1039708] perl-DateTime-1.04 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039708 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-DateTime-1.04-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-1.04-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1039708] perl-DateTime-1.04 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039708 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-DateTime-1.04-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-1.04-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1039844] New: perl-DateTime-1.04 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039844 Bug ID: 1039844 Summary: perl-DateTime-1.04 is available Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Version: 7.0 Component: perl-DateTime Keywords: FutureFeature, Rebase, Triaged

[Bug 1039708] perl-DateTime-1.04 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039708 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|iarn...@gmail.com, |

File Gnome2-1.045.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2013-12-09 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Gnome2: 95c06139f9d950df17c9cb0340c74168 Gnome2-1.045.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Gnome2] 1.045 bump

2013-12-09 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 2a97619f3bd70e9c212791093fd36a6b5672bf4d Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Tue Dec 10 08:47:54 2013 +0100 1.045 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Gnome2.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[perl-Gnome2/f20] 1.045 bump

2013-12-09 Thread Petr Pisar
Summary of changes: 2a97619... 1.045 bump (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1039712] perl-Gnome2-1.045 is available

2013-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039712 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- This changes documentation only. Suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[perl-Gnome2/f19] 1.045 bump

2013-12-09 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 41ede1e0b21e4c5498a263f0781ecf4d548ff019 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Tue Dec 10 08:47:54 2013 +0100 1.045 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Gnome2.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[perl-Gnome2/f18] 1.045 bump

2013-12-09 Thread Petr Pisar
commit a7c9f37be74cd730a8816b46511bc10f8314b1b4 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Tue Dec 10 08:47:54 2013 +0100 1.045 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Gnome2.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47623 fix memleak caused by 47347

2013-12-09 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47623/0001-Ticket-47623-fix-memleak-caused-by-47347.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [AutoQA] #445: upgradepath is failing rawhide builds due to not being higher version than other releases

2013-12-09 Thread AutoQA
#445: upgradepath is failing rawhide builds due to not being higher version than other releases +- Reporter: tflink | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Hot issues Component: tests |

[Maniphest] [Created] T26: Display all users that are listed in needinfo flag

2013-12-09 Thread mkrizek (Martin Krizek)
mkrizek created this task. mkrizek claimed this task. mkrizek added a subscriber: mkrizek. mkrizek added a project: blockerbugs TASK DESCRIPTION Currently only the first user that info is needed from in bugzilla is displayed. The task here is to display all of them. TASK DETAIL

Re: [Fedora QA] #416: irc list sort order doesn't match html buglist

2013-12-09 Thread Fedora QA
#416: irc list sort order doesn't match html buglist ---+--- Reporter: tflink| Owner: tflink Type: defect| Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: