Re: AppData Screenshot Requirements

2014-12-18 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On 13 December 2014 at 01:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote: I think you should step back and consider this in context. *Everything* we do in Fedora, and more generally speaking in open source, is a work in progress. 100% agree, I

Re: AppData Screenshot Requirements

2014-12-18 Thread Richard Hughes
On 18 December 2014 at 09:46, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote: To be honest, the slowly evolving AppData requirements/changes have also grated me the wrong way. Okay, so that's probably something we need to do something about. Would more frequent blogging help or hinder this? I get

Re: AppData Screenshot Requirements

2014-12-18 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On 18 December 2014 at 09:46, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote: To be honest, the slowly evolving AppData requirements/changes have also grated me the wrong way. Okay, so that's probably something we need to do something about. Would more frequent

Re: AppData Screenshot Requirements

2014-12-18 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bastien Nocera wrote: It's not the blogging. Blogging more often that the standards were upped and that next month's Fedora release won't accept your old AppData is fine. Blogging every month saying we changed this little thing is more the problem. Other maintainers might appreciate the early

Re: AppData Screenshot Requirements

2014-12-18 Thread Richard Hughes
On 18 December 2014 at 10:18, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote: I get confused by the upstream vs. Fedora requirements, They are the same thing, no? You tell me ;) Yes, they are :) Would a generated HTML page ... be a useful thing to do? That would be useful indeed, as long as it

Re: AppData Screenshot Requirements

2014-12-18 Thread Richard Hughes
On 18 December 2014 at 12:36, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: As for my opinion, what I consider the real problem is the fact that the requirements are growing at all, or even that there ARE such requirements to begin with. Right, I'm about done with this discussion. You've made

Re: AppData Screenshot Requirements

2014-12-18 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:22:04PM +, Richard Hughes wrote: On 18 December 2014 at 10:18, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote: I get confused by the upstream vs. Fedora requirements, They are the same thing, no? You tell me ;) Yes, they are :) Would a generated HTML page ...

Re: AppData Screenshot Requirements

2014-12-18 Thread Tom Hughes
On 18/12/14 15:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: I'm a bit confused by this. For emacs the output is: emacs emacsOK OKOKOK Warning OK emacsclientemacsOK Warning Warning OK Warning Failed But

Re: AppData Screenshot Requirements

2014-12-18 Thread Richard Hughes
On 18 December 2014 at 15:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote: I'm a bit confused by this. For emacs the output is: emacs emacsOK OKOKOK Warning OK emacsclientemacsOK Warning Warning OK Warning

Emacs .desktop (was: AppData Screenshot Requirements)

2014-12-18 Thread Peter Oliver
On 18 December 2014 at 15:50, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote: On 18/12/14 15:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: I'm a bit confused by this. For emacs the output is: emacs emacsOK OKOKOK Warning OK emacsclientemacsOK Warning

Re: Emacs .desktop (was: AppData Screenshot Requirements)

2014-12-18 Thread Richard Hughes
On 18 December 2014 at 20:25, Peter Oliver lists.fedoraproject@mavit.org.uk wrote: Actually, I think it's emacs that shouldn't have a .desktop file of its own. I don't mind *which* gets to stay, but I do think we need to nuke one of them. :) Richard. -- devel mailing list

Re: Emacs .desktop (was: AppData Screenshot Requirements)

2014-12-18 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 08:47:00PM +, Richard Hughes wrote: On 18 December 2014 at 20:25, Peter Oliver lists.fedoraproject@mavit.org.uk wrote: Actually, I think it's emacs that shouldn't have a .desktop file of its own. I don't mind *which* gets to stay, but I do think we need to

Re: AppData Screenshot Requirements

2014-12-13 Thread Richard Hughes
On 13 December 2014 at 01:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote: I think you should step back and consider this in context. *Everything* we do in Fedora, and more generally speaking in open source, is a work in progress. 100% agree, I couldn't have said this better myself.

AppData Screenshot Requirements

2014-12-12 Thread Richard Hughes
tl;dr: AppStream builder will reject AppData screenshots smaller than 312x175. If you want things to be pixel-crisp and your application ships only one screenshot use 752x423. If you've got multiple screenshots use 624x351, or integer multiples thereof. You can still ship random sized screenshots

Re: AppData Screenshot Requirements

2014-12-12 Thread Jerry James
Mr. Hughes, I have a complaint. On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: If you want things to be pixel-crisp and your application ships only one screenshot use 752x423. If you've got multiple screenshots use 624x351, or integer multiples thereof. You can

Re: AppData Screenshot Requirements

2014-12-12 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:53:01PM -0700, Jerry James wrote: Mr. Hughes, I have a complaint. On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: If you want things to be pixel-crisp and your application ships only one screenshot use 752x423. If you've got multiple