Hi,
On 01/12/2010 02:30 PM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
Hello,
Am Dienstag, den 12.01.2010, 12:39 +0100 schrieb Hans de Goede:
For Fedora-14 (to be released November 2010) it would be nice to have
a
gtk application for controlling various camera settings (brightness,
contrast, etc.) *and* a
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 11:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 01/12/2010 01:13 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Good idea, apart from:
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 12:39 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
For Fedora-14 (to be released November 2010) it would be nice to have
a
gtk application for
2010/1/15 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com:
2010/1/15 Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com:
Removing geronimo-specs removes these:
geronimo-specs-compat-0:1.0-2.M2.fc10.x86_64
Eek! I think geronimo-specs-compat is (transitively) needed by a bunch
of other Java packages including maven; on my
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552564
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:23:44AM +, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
2010/1/15 Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com:
Removing geronimo-specs removes these:
geronimo-specs-compat-0:1.0-2.M2.fc10.x86_64
Eek! I think geronimo-specs-compat is (transitively) needed by a bunch
of other Java packages
On 01/15/2010 01:10 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
This is the second time in a row, generating backtrace seems to run forever.
Something wrong?
abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.x86_64
What is it you're trying to process? If it's some bigger thing like
Firefox or Openoffice it might take a really long time.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552564
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2010-01-15 08:46:27 EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
- rpmlint is NOT silent
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 07:27 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
-
Removing gmfsk also removes:
This one is now fixed.
-
Removing gnome-scan also removes:
There's a patch logged against this now FWIW
Removing Io-language also removes:
This one is now fixed.
-3
- bump for libssh2 rebuild
lvm2-2.02.58-1.fc13
---
man-pages-ja-20100115-1.fc13
* Fri Jan 15 2010 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com - 20100115-1
- updates to 20100115.
medusa-1.5-11.fc13
--
* Thu Jan 14 2010 Chris Weyl cw
2010/1/15 Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com:
OK, re-run, removing the three packages noted as fixed overnight.
-
Removing geronimo-specs also removes:
[ lots of stuff! ]
Almost all of these are due to the dependency chain jms (virtual
provide) - avalon-logkit - velocity - (all
2010/1/15 Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com:
ohm-0.1.1-9.39.20091215git.fc11.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539200
This should be a dead package, upstream is no longer being maintained.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:59:32PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:36:47PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
Anyone else interested in working on packaging this?
Can it be build and used without the rawzor binary blobs?
No. That's Needs Work.
Wait,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00:50AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, have been open
since the Fedora 11 time frame, and continue to fail to build. These
are the oldest non-building packages in the distribution, everything
else (over 8800) managed
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 13:48 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 07:27 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
-
Removing gmfsk also removes:
This one is now fixed.
-
Removing gnome-scan also removes:
There's a patch logged against this now FWIW
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511729
Till Maas opensou...@till.name changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539136
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-01-15
11:32:02 EST ---
perl-Class-InsideOut-1.10-1.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539136
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 10:55 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:31:41PM +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2010, 22:54 -0500 schrieb Toshio Kuratomi:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:56:23PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
python3 is in rawhide and I'm hoping
We are discussing the complete removal of pkgconfig support from openmpi
(and never including it in mvapich and mvapich2 which are ready for
Fedora package review submission). The proper way to invoke mpi
compiles is through the use of the mpicc (or equivalent) compiler
instead of directly via
Any way I can get bugzilla to search closed bugs again by default with
quicksearch? I really miss it.
Maybe I need to learn search templates - is there such a thing?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX:
On 01/15/2010 01:00 AM, Matt Domsch wrote:
perl-AnyEvent-XMPP-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511749
This one is awaiting an upstream fix (probably coming with 0.6).
perl-Class-InsideOut-1.09-2.fc11.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539136
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511749
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2010-01-15 13:56:02 EST ---
perl-AnyEvent-XMPP-0.51-1.fc12
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:13:41 -0600, Matt wrote:
Folks, while I appreciate you fixing these packages so they build
again, _please_ do take the time to consider if they are unloved
enough to be orphaned and dropped anyhow. If it's a leaf node in the
dependency tree, dead upstream, and
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 02:41:57PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 01/15/2010 01:10 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
This is the second time in a row, generating backtrace seems to run forever.
Something wrong?
abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.x86_64
What is it you're trying to process? If it's some bigger thing
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 13:17 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
Any package still orphaned as of the Feb 16 F13 Alpha freeze will be
dropped per standard operating procedure.
I might attempt to drop them a bit earlier than alpha freeze, so that if
there is unexpected fallout we have time to fix it
Le lundi 11 janvier 2010 09:24:28, Andrea Musuruane a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Alain Portal alain.por...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
In order to improve the desktop file of a package I maintain, I should
want to know if there is a guideline for desktop file in Fedora.
google donẗ
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Alain Portal alain.por...@free.fr wrote:
I'm sorry, I forgot to answer this :-(
And I see that perhaps, I wasn't very clear in my question.
I'm talking about the Categories entry.
I could see in some desktop files provided by applications that some
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:17:28PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00:50AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, have been open
since the Fedora 11 time frame, and continue to fail to build. These
are the oldest non-building
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:01:20PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:17:28PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00:50AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, have been open
since the Fedora 11 time frame, and
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 00:00 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
xqilla-2.1.3-0.6.fc11.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511425
This one also has a major policy breach issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555836
(it ships its own copy of xerces)
--
Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 20:04 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:17:21 +0100, Milos wrote:
On 15.1.2010 07:00, Matt Domsch wrote:
synce-kde-0.9.1-4.fc11.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539195
Synce-kde should be EOL'd already a long time (it
On 15/01/10 09:04 AM, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
2010/1/15 Matt Domschmatt_dom...@dell.com:
OK, re-run, removing the three packages noted as fixed overnight.
-
Removing geronimo-specs also removes:
[ lots of stuff! ]
Almost all of these are due to the dependency chain jms
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:45:05AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 10:55 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
This reasoning (needed for testing) doesn't appeal to me at all. The
general case should be that we switch applications in rawhide from python2
to python3. Test those
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:45 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
= Support files for the Python language =
/usr/bin/g-ir-scanner
I don't see any intrinsic value in having both versions of
g-ir-scanner available; this one should be in the other category, it's
just a program which
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 23:04 +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
A good initiative, but seems to be stillborn (stillbirth? In french :
« mort-
né ») as it seems to be optionnal.
What I wanted to point is, as an example, my Utility menu is really
too full!
There are 29 applications entries in it,
Le vendredi 15 janvier 2010 23:42:41, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 23:04 +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
A good initiative, but seems to be stillborn (stillbirth? In french :
« mort-
né ») as it seems to be optionnal.
What I wanted to point is, as an example, my Utility
On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 02:25 +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
mode l10n=French
Putain ! Mais c'est pas possible !
C'est à se cogner la tête contre les murs !!!
Un vrai dialogue de sourds...
/mode
Please, is there a french speaking fedora developer to contact me
and
who
could
I want to take qtiplot, because the maintainer of qtiplot becomes unresponsive
for nearly one year.
Since I am not a fedora packages yet, I need a sponser to review some of my
packages such as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541207.
Chen Lei,
?--
devel mailing list
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 05:13:29AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/15/2010 08:17 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
Unfortunately, this has proven to be hard/impossible so far.
perl-Class-InsideOut-1.09-2.fc11.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539136
I intended to take this
On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 04:03 +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
Because we don't set up Fedora's menu structure to have submenus, at
present.
These submenus existed on FC6!!!
I can provide photographies (not screenshots) if you don't trust me!
As I show you in my previous message with the cat
Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the Law.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Alain Portal alain.por...@free.fr wrote:
Le samedi 16 janvier 2010 02:43:13, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 02:25 +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
mode l10n=French
Putain ! Mais c'est pas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555430
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552564
--- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-01-15 09:08:24 EST
---
Ah! how come I missed that requires.
Hey all --
So, I was looking into a FTBFS report on perl-SQL-Translator[1], when
I noticed that %perl_vendorlib was evaluating to /usr/share/perl5.
Checking out devel/perl.spec I see it defined this way as well;
unversioned, and undifferentiated from core.
Not to put too fine a point on it, is
44 matches
Mail list logo
