Hi,
I have started the retiring process for bazaar in the F13 and devel
branch.
Please update your package if it depends on bazaar!
Thanks!
Zoltan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I'll take me-tv, co-maintainers are welcome.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Zoltan Kota z.k...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
I have started the retiring process for bazaar in the F13 and devel
branch.
Please update your package if it depends on bazaar!
Thanks!
Zoltan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
looks like packages are not orphaned yet.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Adam Miller (maxamill...@fedoraproject.org) said:
I have started the retiring process for bazaar in the F13 and devel
branch.
Please update your package if it depends on bazaar!
Thanks!
Just out of curiosity, why is this package being retired?
AFAIK, it's been completely replaced by
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 07:36:09AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
We don't really have a coverage list, but most of the people who have
been doing tagging are all in the US time zones, so anything outside of
that is welcome.
Ok.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Buildroot_override_SOP is the
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Adam Miller (maxamill...@fedoraproject.org) said:
I have started the retiring process for bazaar in the F13 and devel
branch.
Please update your package if it depends on bazaar!
Thanks!
Just out of curiosity, why
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-19/fedora-releng.2010-02-19-18.18.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-19/fedora-releng.2010-02-19-18.18.txt
Log:
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 12:26 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-19/fedora-releng.2010-02-19-18.18.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-19/fedora-releng.2010-02-19-18.18.txt
Log:
Talking points are key highlights of the new release. They should be
compelling, but they will not necessarily be comprehensive. There are
different types of talking points for different types of people:
general desktop users/everyone, developers, and sysadmins. For the
Fedora 13 cycle, we will
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 01:42:29AM +0100, Christian Krause wrote:
Hi Luke,
On 02/18/2010 10:08 PM, Luke Macken wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:57:58PM -0500, Josh Kayse wrote:
On 02/18/2010 02:35 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
Hi,
I just logged into the bodhi web interface and
Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com writes:
A large number of updates currently suffer from duplicate IDs, and I
need to figure out a clever way to fix it.
Would it be prudent to not push new updates until you've fixed it?
regards, tom lane
--
devel mailing list
Hi there,
I'm the Miro maintainer and the new xulrunner/firefox API bump causes a
broken dep because Miro wasn't able to be rebuilt see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-1727
and:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566883
The proximate cause of this rebuild
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 03:59 -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if it's worth trying update to development release
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SR/SREZIC/Tk-804.028_502.tar.gz
or if you prefer pick interesting patches? The thing is we have three
years old
The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==
package:
On 02/18/2010 07:41 PM, Andreas Bierfert wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 03:59 -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if it's worth trying update to development release
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SR/SREZIC/Tk-804.028_502.tar.gz
or if you prefer pick interesting
- Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
The following packages in the repository suffer from broken
dependencies:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-FileHandle-Unget/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10244
Modified Files:
perl-FileHandle-Unget.spec
Log Message:
* Fri Feb 19 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 0.1623-3
- Fix versioned provide for
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13112
Modified Files:
perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser.spec
Added Files:
perl-module-version-filter
Log Message:
* Fri Feb 19 2010 Paul Howarth
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-CGI-Untaint-date/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20352/devel
Modified Files:
perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec
Log Message:
fix FTBFS
Index: perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-CGI-Untaint-date/F-13
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24567/F-13
Modified Files:
perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec
Log Message:
disable tests
Index: perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-CGI-Untaint-date/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24567/devel
Modified Files:
perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec
Log Message:
disable tests
Index: perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565192
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Catalyst-View-TT/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26966
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Catalyst-View-TT.spec sources
Log Message:
* Sat Feb 20 2010 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.32-1
- update by
perl-Archive-RPM has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Archive-RPM-0.05-1.fc13.noarch requires
perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX)
On i386:
perl-Archive-RPM-0.05-1.fc13.noarch requires
perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
perl-Fedora-Bugzilla has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Fedora-Bugzilla-0.13-2.fc13.noarch requires
perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX)
On i386:
perl-Fedora-Bugzilla-0.13-2.fc13.noarch requires
perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX)
Please resolve this as soon as
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Moose:
c040bde14d843ea09a0d138b25642f42 Moose-0.98.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
27 matches
Mail list logo
