On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 23:20 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> When going to a new folder and the first new email, seems evo won't show
> the email as read even tho it's clicked on. Have to click on another
> email and back to it, or open the email to show as read.
>
> evolution-2.30.0-1.fc13.x86_64
>
When going to a new folder and the first new email, seems evo won't show
the email as read even tho it's clicked on. Have to click on another
email and back to it, or open the email to show as read.
evolution-2.30.0-1.fc13.x86_64
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"Best lil town on Earth!"
--
> pyclutter-gst-0.9.2-1.fc12.i686 requires libclutter-gst-0.10.so.0
This package and pyclutter-gtk have been split out into separate
packages. I've submitted the following package reviews to fix this
problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579288
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
Hi *,
since the last stable kernel update in Fedora 12, a lot of Dell machines
do not boot anymore due to a kernel oops... Of course bugzilla has a
couple of bug reports (e.g. #578217, #579118, #578663, #578590).
There is a known fix/workaround which is already present in CVS
(kernel-2.6.32.10
W dniu 03.04.2010 20:52, Felix Kaechele pisze:
> I talked to him on IRC three days ago and he accepted one of my bugs I
> filed at morituri's (a cd ripping tool of his, best there is) bugtracker.
>
> Maybe ping him on IRC. His nick is thomasvs.
>
> Felix
I tried a couple of times, but we seem to
I talked to him on IRC three days ago and he accepted one of my bugs I
filed at morituri's (a cd ripping tool of his, best there is) bugtracker.
Maybe ping him on IRC. His nick is thomasvs.
Felix
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf
I submitted a bug fix patch for easytag to both upstream and RH BZ[1].
The request is among 11 other[2] outstanding crashing bugs that have not
been responded to in about six months. Upstream is also not responsive
after several e-mail attempts over the past three months.
Does anyone know how t
Dear all,
it seems like thomasvs became unresponsive. I have filed a bug asking
about python-twisted update [1] on 6th of February. It was then duped by
a similar bug [2] on 23rd of March. I have also emailed Thomas on 26th
of March. None of the queries met any response. Should I initiate the
non-
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
...
>> > Removed package cppi
>> ...
>>
>> Why has cppi been removed?
>
> Probably the f12 version was being inherited into f13 stable. Currently
> there is an f13 version in f13 testing. The maintainer can push this
> to f13 stable if they want it in the release.
Oh, ok.
Th
Compose started at Sat Apr 3 09:15:05 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
edje-0.9.9.050-6.fc12.i686 requires libembryo.so.0
edje-devel-0.9.9.050-6.fc12.i686 requires embryo-devel
gnome-web-photo-0.9-4.fc13.i686 requires
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 18:30:22 +0200,
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Branched Report wrote:
> ...
> > Removed package 4ti2
> > Removed package bakefile
> > Removed package cppi
> ...
>
> Why has cppi been removed?
Probably the f12 version was being inherited into f13 stable. Currently
there is an f13
Branched Report wrote:
...
> Removed package 4ti2
> Removed package bakefile
> Removed package cppi
...
Why has cppi been removed?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Compose started at Sat Apr 3 08:15:08 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
Miro-2.5.4-3.fc14.i686 requires gecko-libs = 0:1.9.2.2
banshee-mirage-0.6.0-1.fc13.i686 requires mono(Banshee.Core) = 0:1.5.0.0
banshee-mirage-0.6
PackageKit allows a forced install of unsigned pkg.
yu does the following:
Package krb5-libs-1.7.1-7.fc13.i686.rpm is not signed
I know about --nogpgcheck.
But can I edit something to the effect of:
If unsigned don't include.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86_64 Kernel x86 Bo
14 matches
Mail list logo
