On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
BZ-attached here:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/584997
Read up on:
yum-plugin-protect-packages
if your going on autopilot.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86 64-32 Hybrid
--
devel mailing
Hi,
we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla
package and ship it as 'Firefox' or 'Thunderbird'.
I've asked for inclusion at upstream bug,
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550455, if
On 04/23/2010 09:03 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi,
we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla
package and ship it as 'Firefox' or 'Thunderbird'.
Thanks for providing evidence of how trademarks
On 04/23/2010 09:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/23/2010 09:03 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi,
we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla
package and ship it as 'Firefox' or 'Thunderbird'.
On 04/23/2010 12:33 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi,
we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla
package and ship it as 'Firefox' or 'Thunderbird'.
I've asked for inclusion at upstream bug,
David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:03 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
I would rather patch the tcl script to use the binary in /usr/bin :)
Unless people thing otherwise.
Why deviate from what upstream does, which is to use /usr/sbin?
This is fixed now in
On 04/23/2010 09:30 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 04/23/2010 12:33 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi,
we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla
package and ship it as 'Firefox' or 'Thunderbird'.
On 04/23/2010 01:12 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 04/23/2010 09:30 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
What is the exact definition of really critical issues here. A
frequent crash seems a critical issue to me.
- 0day vulnerabilities
- critical crashes (like app fails to start for *everyone*, app
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/23/2010 09:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/23/2010 09:03 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi,
we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch
On Friday 23 of April 2010 09:03:37 Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi,
we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla
package and ship it as 'Firefox' or 'Thunderbird'.
just curious: is it possible to ship
On 04/23/2010 11:11 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
On Friday 23 of April 2010 09:03:37 Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi,
we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla
package and ship it as 'Firefox' or
On 04/23/2010 09:24 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 04/23/2010 09:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/23/2010 09:03 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi,
we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:40 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I've spent a little time looking at the hardware side of things and
done a basic patch for some of the hardware stuff based on the current
rawhide comps
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 16:45 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 21 April 2010 16:40, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
software needs to be installed for a given bit of hardware. It's
really the kind of thing that needs to be added to udev as just a
simple rule, and then enabled in
Compose started at Fri Apr 23 08:15:03 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
evolution-couchdb-0.3.2-2.fc13.i686 requires libcouchdb-glib-1.0.so.1
metagoofil-1.4a-4.fc14.noarch requires /usr/bin/libextractor-extractor
On Friday 23 April 2010 13:07:46 Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Fri Apr 23 08:15:03 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
[...]
skyviewer-1.0.0-3.fc12.i686 requires libQGLViewer.so.2
Broken deps for x86_64
Frank Murphy wrote:
On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
BZ-attached here:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/584997
Read up on:
yum-plugin-protect-packages
if your going on autopilot.
Thanks. Installed.
IMHO, one should always be able to run yum
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
BZ-attached here:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/584997
Read up on:
yum-plugin-protect-packages
if your going on autopilot.
Thanks.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28
Should we have:
postgresql-pgpool-II
postgresql-orafce
or just:
pgpool-II
orafce
Let start discussing. My opinion is postgresql-* because it has kind of
same namespace.
--
Miroslav Suchy
Red Hat Satellite Engineering
--
devel mailing
# What: F-13 Blocker bug review
# When: Friday, 2010-04-23 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT)
# Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Today in about an hour (apologies for the late notice!) will be the
second scheduled [1] Fedora 13 Blocker bug review meeting. We'll
be reviewing all F13Blocker bugs
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:40 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28
Should we have:
postgresql-pgpool-II
postgresql-orafce
or just:
pgpool-II
orafce
Let start discussing. My opinion is postgresql-* because it has kind
of same namespace.
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= fedora-l...@gunduz.org writes:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:40 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28
Should we have:
postgresql-pgpool-II
postgresql-orafce
or just:
pgpool-II
orafce
Let start discussing.
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= fedora-l...@gunduz.org writes:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:40 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28
Should we have:
postgresql-pgpool-II
postgresql-orafce
R 2.11.0 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in updates-testing.
In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new
packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either
receive positive testing from users, or sit in updates-testing for two
weeks.
You can help us
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
BZ-attached here:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/584997
Read up on:
yum-plugin-protect-packages
if your going on autopilot.
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
BZ-attached here:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/584997
Read up on:
A while back I was complaining about how the KDE SIG handles bug
reports. One could certainly argue that closing everything UPSTREAM
doesn't help to track bugs in Fedora, but on the other hand the bugs are
at least submitted to the original developers.
When I receive a bug report I have a look
Christoph Wickert wrote:
When I receive a bug report I have a look at it and if it contains all
necessary data, I forward it to upstream's bug tracker. Most of the time
the developers are very thankful about the reports and especially the
backtraces. Looking at the bugs I filed I see that
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= fedora-list at gunduz.org writes:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:40 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28
Should we have:
postgresql-pgpool-II
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
BZ-attached here:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/584997
Read up on:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
I've just realized that I had a list of all packages/versions
that were installed as of a few weeks ago (April 5).
In case it helps:
Yah - the history sqlite file you uploaded has all that info in there (in
a round about way) but the problem still
On 04/23/2010 08:47 PM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?=fedora-list at gunduz.org writes:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:40 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28
Should
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de writes:
Thinking of more general packages, e.g a java binding for postgresql, I
would prefer names like postgresql-java (or similar) to be able to
differentiate from mysql-java, ingres-java (given, those packages do
exist). To be conformant to this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
With a Fedora release coming soon, it's also time for Fedora
Elections. Both the Fedora Project Board and the Fedora Engineering
Steering Committee (FESCo) will have open seats during this election
cycle.
Nominations for these seats open tomorrow,
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 23:30 +, Branched Report wrote:
Disregard this. It was sent from the future where the world has ended
and there is no Branched tree to push.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 15:52 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
I've just realized that I had a list of all packages/versions
that were installed as of a few weeks ago (April 5).
In case it helps:
Yah - the history sqlite file you uploaded has all that
On behalf of Nigel Jones, I'm letting people know that the following
packages have been orphaned:
* R-DBI -- Database interface module for R
* R-RSQLite -- SQLite database interface for R
* pAgenda -- A cross platform calendar and scheduler
* perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP -- CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-MIME-tools/F-13
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29895
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-MIME-tools.spec sources
Log Message:
* Thu Apr 22 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 5.428-1
- Update to 5.428
- RT#56764:
Hi,
I am trying to package Sys::CPU [1], as I require this for another
Perl package. My .spec file is at:
http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/perl-Sys-CPU.spec
When not using any BuildArch it fails for x86_64:
=== OUTPUT ===
RPM build errors:
File not found by glob:
On 23/04/10 16:41, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to package Sys::CPU [1], as I require this for another
Perl package. My .spec file is at:
http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/perl-Sys-CPU.spec
When not using any BuildArch it fails for x86_64:
=== OUTPUT ===
RPM build
Hi,
--- On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote:
| General rule of thumb: if you have BuildArch: noarch then you use
| %{perl_vendorlib}; otherwise you use %{perl_vendorarch} instead.
\--
Thanks! It worked!
I shall submit the package for review soon.
SK
--
On 04/21/2010 05:28 PM, Greer, George wrote:
I've managed to build a perl-5.12.0 RPM based on Marcela's spec file posted
Monday, so I thought I'd contribute back what I found.
First, the perl5db test does fail based on trying to link against perl-5.10's
readline but adding the attached patch
I was trying to build into test buildroot, but I wasn't successful yet.
It's something wrong with this buildroot or my koji command [1]. Anyway
I hope next week I'll be able to build perl and modules into this
buildroot and see what's break.
Any comments welcome.
[1]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585336
Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Package perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP in Fedora 11 was orphaned by nigelj
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP in Fedora devel was orphaned by nigelj
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP in Fedora 12 was orphaned by nigelj
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP in Fedora 13 was orphaned by nigelj
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP in Fedora 9 was orphaned by nigelj
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP in Fedora 8 was orphaned by nigelj
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP in Fedora 10 was orphaned by nigelj
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Crypt-Rijndael in Fedora 13 was orphaned by nigelj
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Crypt-Rijndael
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Crypt-Rijndael in Fedora 11 was orphaned by nigelj
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Crypt-Rijndael
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Crypt-Rijndael in Fedora 10 was orphaned by nigelj
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Crypt-Rijndael
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Crypt-Rijndael in Fedora EPEL 4 was orphaned by nigelj
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Crypt-Rijndael
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Crypt-Rijndael in Fedora EPEL 5 was orphaned by nigelj
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Crypt-Rijndael
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Crypt-Rijndael in Fedora 8 was orphaned by nigelj
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Crypt-Rijndael
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
58 matches
Mail list logo
