Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20376/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Log Message:
Initial import of perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma
Index: .cvsignore
==
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma/F-13
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20376/F-13
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Log Message:
Initial import of perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma
Index: .cvsignore
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:14:58 -0400,
James Antill wrote:
>
> 6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> 12M hanazono-fonts-20100222-2.fc13.noarch.rpm
> 48M xmoto-0.5.3-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> 260M wesnoth-data-1.8.1-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
> 318M openarena-0.8.5-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
I don't think either w
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 22:47 -0500, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
>> Fedora only has one branched, yet unreleased release at a time. Can we
>> recycle the same tag(s) for every release instead of creating new ones
>> every time?
>
> We could proba
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:14:58AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
>
> Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
> think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
> combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
>
> 6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x8
Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
12M hanazono-fonts-20100222-2.fc13.noarch.rpm
48M xmoto-0.5.3-1
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 2010 14:25:02 +0300
> "Ionuț C. Arțăriși" wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I don't have the time to maintain calibre any more so I'm orphaning
> > it. I fell behind on bugzilla, too.
> >
> > Beware, it requires a lot of love. Up
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 22:47 -0500, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> Fedora only has one branched, yet unreleased release at a time. Can we
> recycle the same tag(s) for every release instead of creating new ones
> every time?
We could probably name them such, just {alpha,beta,final}_blocker, and
only
Solid idea.
+1
-AdamM (from Android )
On May 10, 2010 10:23 PM, "Jesse Keating" wrote:
So, I know a lot of you out there hate bugzilla flags, but I think we
have problem with the current way we manage release blocker issues, and
flags offer a potential solution.
First the problem:
Right now
On 5/10/2010 22:23, Jesse Keating wrote:
> (our?) Bugzilla already has a method for proposal and acceptance. This
> is done via flags. We currently use this for package reviews and CVS
> admin tasks. What I propose is that we introduce a new flag once we've
> branched a release and created a bug
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 02:12 +, Branched Report wrote:
>
> Broken deps for i386
> --
> 1:mojito-devel-0.21.7-3.fc13.i686 requires mojito =
> 0:0.21.7-3.fc13
I've fixed this and have a new compose going.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora
So, I know a lot of you out there hate bugzilla flags, but I think we
have problem with the current way we manage release blocker issues, and
flags offer a potential solution.
First the problem:
Right now, anybody can propose a release blocker bug. This is not the
problem though, the problem is
Compose started at Mon May 10 21:49:13 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
1:mojito-devel-0.21.7-3.fc13.i686 requires mojito = 0:0.21.7-3.fc13
Broken deps for x86_64
--
1
Garrett Holmstrom writes:
> On 5/10/2010 15:46, Casey Dahlin wrote:
>> On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 01:10:18AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>>> Long time ago, all *redhat* packages were renamed to "system*".
>>> But three of them are still alive: redhat-lsb, redhat-menus and
>>> redhat-rpm-config
On Mon, 10 May 2010 14:25:02 +0300
"Ionuț C. Arțăriși" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I don't have the time to maintain calibre any more so I'm orphaning
> it. I fell behind on bugzilla, too.
>
> Beware, it requires a lot of love. Upstream moves very fast. Releases
> happen weekly and there are always
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 01:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:05 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > > I do not agree that that working with zero community input is the way to
> > > achieve a working compromise. (And input
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
>> > but conversely
>> > there's some weirdness with the sound driver resulting in no sound (for
>> > which I will collate some data before blindly filing a bug on that).
Ok then if no one does it (or my search skills suck...):
https://bugzilla.
Fedora 13 has released Release Candidate stage. We have reached a state
where the known blockers were fixed and were able to make a release
candidate. This happened last Thursday, and almost immediately we found
a need to spin a second release candidate. From this point on, only
items critical t
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:37:16AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Monday 10 May 2010 11:18:26 am Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> > Index: redir.spec
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/redir/EL-6/redir.spec,v
> > retrieving revision 1
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:05 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > I do not agree that that working with zero community input is the way to
> > achieve a working compromise. (And input does not equal vote)
> >
> What makes you think that no commun
On Mon, 10 May 2010 15:00:18 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting tomorrow at 19:00UTC (3pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
> = Followups =
>
> #351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementa
/*Matthias Clasen */ wrote on 05/10/2010 5:59:56 PM
+0450:
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 17:58 +0430, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Anyway, thinking about the problem with DeviceKit system policies, I
really feel that the current situation is flawed: a process running as
root is able to mount a devic
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 19:00UTC (3pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
= Followups =
#351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation
= New Business =
#373 erlang provides/requires explosion
#374 Mo
On 05/11/2010 02:20 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> If they aren't specific to only Fedora like fedora-release and
> fedora-release-notes are, why put "fedora" in the package names at all?
>
Besides switching from Red Hat to Fedora is fairly pointless since both
names have trademark requirement
On 5/10/2010 15:46, Casey Dahlin wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 01:10:18AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>> Long time ago, all *redhat* packages were renamed to "system*".
>> But three of them are still alive: redhat-lsb, redhat-menus and
>> redhat-rpm-config
>>
>> Should they switch to "syst
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 01:10:18AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> hi,
>
> Long time ago, all *redhat* packages were renamed to "system*".
> But three of them are still alive: redhat-lsb, redhat-menus and
> redhat-rpm-config
>
> Should they switch to "system-" ?
>
> -thanks-
>
I think s/re
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Christopher Brown
>> No, if you build against the mono.snk strong name key in /etc/pki then
>> there should be no bootstrapping required. This is provided by
>> mono-devel I think.
> there are no mono-devel in EL-6,
>
> EL-6 not inhe
On Mon, 10 May 2010 16:40:24 -0300
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> >
> > Or you can just use:
> >
> > BuildRequires: /usr/include/tcpd.h
> >
> > which works everywhere and you don't need conditionals.
> >
> > Paul.
> >
>
> seems to be interesting, but using filenames instead package names in
> yum
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577790
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574431
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574409
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-10
16:15:36 EDT ---
perl-Net-SSH-0.09-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574431
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-10
16:15:53 EDT ---
perl-Sys-SigAction-0.11-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574409
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577790
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-10
16:15:14 EDT ---
perl-X11-Protocol-0.56-5.el5, clusterssh-3.26-2.el5 has be
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Module-Signature/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30480
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Module-Signature.spec sources
Log Message:
Update to 0.64
Index: .cvsignore
=
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Christopher Brown
wrote:
> On 10 May 2010 17:50, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
>> mono requires bootstrapping ?
>>
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172787
>>
>> how to build it ?
>
> No, if you build against the mono.snk strong name key in /etc
On 10 May 2010 17:50, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> mono requires bootstrapping ?
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172787
>
> how to build it ?
No, if you build against the mono.snk strong name key in /etc/pki then
there should be no bootstrapping required. This is provided
>
> Or you can just use:
>
> BuildRequires: /usr/include/tcpd.h
>
> which works everywhere and you don't need conditionals.
>
> Paul.
>
seems to be interesting, but using filenames instead package names in
yum appears to be more slow, I think only in build time should not be
a problem.
--
---
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:36 AM, drago01 wrote:
>> Fix what is broken and not break everything else so that you can
>> pretend that it isn't.
>
> Think of that opening remark as a modern twitter-friendly version of
> "A Modest Proposal" give
On Mon, 10 May 2010 11:37:16 -0500
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Monday 10 May 2010 11:18:26 am Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> > Author: itamarjp
> >
> > Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/redir/EL-6
> > In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20463/EL-6
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > import.l
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:36 AM, drago01 wrote:
> Fix what is broken and not break everything else so that you can
> pretend that it isn't.
Think of that opening remark as a modern twitter-friendly version of
"A Modest Proposal" given in the very same spirit of Jonathon Swift's
original.
-jef
-
Start End Name
Tue 04-May Tue 18-May Final Infrastructure Change Freeze
Tue 11-May Tue 11-May Fedora 13 Final Go/No-Go Meeting (20:00 EST)
Wed 12-May Wed 12-May Fedora 13 Final Release Readiness Meeting
Thu 13-May Thu 13-May Start Stage & Sync RC to Mirrors
Thu 13-May Tue 18-
Jeff Spaleta (jspal...@gmail.com) said:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > That's the wrong argument. We all know why we _can't_ make it just work,
> > but that doesn't excuse us.
>
> You are right. The answer is clearly to export US legal rules to the
> rest of the wo
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> That's the wrong argument. We all know why we _can't_ make it just work,
>> but that doesn't excuse us.
>
> You are right. The answer is clearly to export US legal rules to the
> rest
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> That's the wrong argument. We all know why we _can't_ make it just work,
> but that doesn't excuse us.
You are right. The answer is clearly to export US legal rules to the
rest of the world so we can have an equally unfriendly playing fiel
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> I do not agree that that working with zero community input is the way to
> achieve a working compromise. (And input does not equal vote)
>
What makes you think that no community input is considered?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is
On 05/10/2010 08:20 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>
> On ۱۰/۰۵/۱۰ 06:38, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>> On 10/05/10 15:05, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>> --snipp--
>>
>> http://omega.dgplug.org/
>>
>>
> Thanks, I thought that the project is dead (IIRC, it was not provided
> for F11 last time I
On 05/10/2010 04:01 AM, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
> I guess the legal problem(s) may come from the fact that
> newer Wine has cut out its own MP3 decoder and instead,
> it uses dlopened libmpg123. How does it differ from the
> DVD playing situation? Xine, MPlayer, etc. uses libdvdcss
> via dlopen i
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto
wrote:
> mono requires bootstrapping ?
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172787
>
> how to build it ?
Hopefully you can disable enough features on one package such that it will
build so it can then become a dependency to
mono requires bootstrapping ?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172787
how to build it ?
--
Itamar Reis Peixoto
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Monday 10 May 2010 11:18:26 am Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> Author: itamarjp
>
> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/redir/EL-6
> In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20463/EL-6
>
> Modified Files:
> import.log redir.spec
> Log Message:
> - fix building for EL-6
>
>
>
> Index:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>
> Adam Williamson wrote on 05/10/2010 3:18:06 PM +0450:
>
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:33 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
>
>
> Dne 10.5.2010 11:26, drago01 napsal(a):
>
>
> To have stuff just work.
>
>
> Go to http://senate.gov/ and ask your con
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Yaakov M. Nemoy
wrote:
> On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 01:15:03PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
>> I find that having NTP enabled in most cases for mobile systems is simply
>> unnecessary; there is a large (I would say upwards of 95% in my most
>> unscientific guessings) chance
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 00:04 -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
>
> That doesn't mean we should throw it to the wayside. If it works, it works.
> As
> long as someone is there to maintain it, let them maintain it. If the
> maintainer is willing to keep it going, who cares whether it's in the distro?
> In
On ۱۰/۰۵/۱۰ 06:38, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 10/05/10 15:05, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> --snipp--
>
> http://omega.dgplug.org/
>
Thanks, I thought that the project is dead (IIRC, it was not provided
for F11 last time I checked, but apparently I'm wrong). I'll contact him
to see if he is int
Patrice Dumas wrote:
> * xdialog is build twice, once agains gtk+ and then against Gtk2. I think
> it would be nice to keep it that way, though you could also convince the
> current maintainer to keep only the Gtk2 stuff. also xdialog seems to be
> pretty dead upstream too, though I still ha
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 12:38 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the status of support for the Realtek 8192se WiFi
> controller in F12 and F13?
>
> I see in some wiki page a reference to the Realtek website,
> at least for (stock) F12.
>
> Is this chipset in the meantime supported in the F12
On 10/05/10 15:05, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
--snipp--
http://omega.dgplug.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
/*Adam Williamson */ wrote on 05/10/2010 3:18:06 PM
+0450:
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:33 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Dne 10.5.2010 11:26, drago01 napsal(a):
To have stuff just work.
Go to http://senate.gov/ and ask your congressman to fix it. Otherwise
(for example if you don't
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Ryan Rix wrote:
> Here is how I see this: The user installs their system for the first time,
> they set their clock using NTP while they have the connection to the
> internet when they installed their packageset/updates. Now they have an
> accurate clock.
>
> How mu
On 10/05/10 14:28, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
--snip--
>
> Anyway, thinking about the problem with DeviceKit system policies, I
> really feel that the current situation is flawed: a process running as
> root is able to mount a device either by calling mount system call or by
> running the mount comm
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 17:58 +0430, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>
> Anyway, thinking about the problem with DeviceKit system policies, I
> really feel that the current situation is flawed: a process running as
> root is able to mount a device either by calling mount system call or
> by running the mo
/*Frank Murphy */ wrote on 05/10/2010 5:11:13 PM +0450:
On 10/05/10 13:28, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
PackageKit developers disagree with you. Since they are the ones doing
the work involved, their opinion has more weight. Besides a static repo
file is less flexible than the ability for Pack
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the status of support for the Realtek 8192se WiFi
> controller in F12 and F13?
>
> I see in some wiki page a reference to the Realtek website,
> at least for (stock) F12.
>
> Is this chipset in the meantime supported in t
Compose started at Mon May 10 08:15:15 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686 r
On 10/05/10 13:28, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> PackageKit developers disagree with you. Since they are the ones doing
> the work involved, their opinion has more weight. Besides a static repo
> file is less flexible than the ability for PackageKit to handle media
> dynamically. Meanwhile, you c
On 05/10/2010 05:43 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Neither is fixing the RFE for PK, as it's notabug.
> But I firmly believe
> creting a text file, is the easier\maybe safer challenge.
>
PackageKit developers disagree with you. Since they are the ones doing
the work involved, their opinion has more
On 10/05/10 13:10, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snip--
>
> DVD repo is clearly not part of fedora-release at the moment. We are
> talking about the current reality. If you file a RFE and get
> fedora-release updated, then it will become easier but that is not the
> case now.
>
> Rahul
Neither is
--- On Mon, 10/5/10, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Downgrade this.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504949
Hey thanks, it worked.
Thank you.
---
Regards
-Prasad
PS: Please don't send me html/attachment/Fwd mails
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Not sure that people are still unaware of that issue, but, anyway,
> here is my problem: I added RSS-filter to my blog, to properly sort
> out off-topic or unappropriate content from my diary and make it
> suitable for inclusion into Fedora
On 05/10/2010 05:36 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 10/05/10 13:02, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> --snipp--
>
>
>> DVD repo does NOT show up automatically in the repository listing when
>> you install gnome-packagekit-extras.
>>
> I said if DVD.repo is releases with fedora-release*
> it *will* sho
On 10/05/10 13:02, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snipp--
>
> DVD repo does NOT show up automatically in the repository listing when
> you install gnome-packagekit-extras.
I said if DVD.repo is releases with fedora-release*
it *will* show up in default
There are manual fiddling involved
> in setting
On 05/10/2010 05:22 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 10/05/10 1
> How can you not click if it shows up in
> gnome-packagekit-extra?
> (admin/software/sources)
>
> Will not the packages be availabel in add\remove?
>
> They are on my tests.
>
> No user intervention required.
> (allow for the fact my test
On Mon, 10 May 2010 06:49:23 -0400, Orcan wrote:
> >> At that point you break a cult. xmms still has a stubbornly loyal fan
> >> base (just go to #fedora and start talking about it).
> >
> > Why don't they take care of http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/xmms and
> > additional tickets that have been "h
On 10/05/10 12:48, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snipp--
>>>
>> How is it not as easy?
>>
>
> It is not a click through process.
>
> Rahul
How can you not click if it shows up in
gnome-packagekit-extra?
(admin/software/sources)
Will not the packages be availabel in add\remove?
They are on my
On 05/10/2010 05:06 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 10/05/10 12:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> --snip--
>
>>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-May/135944.html
>>> Should work for F13+
>>> even for new users.
>>>
>>>
>> What you describe is not as easy as enabling any other
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 13:21 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 10.5.2010 12:48, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > That's the wrong argument. We all know why we _can't_ make it just work,
> > but that doesn't excuse us. Sorry to take a well-worn analogy, but if
> > two guys are trying to sell you cars, and
On 10/05/10 12:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snip--
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-May/135944.html
>> Should work for F13+
>> even for new users.
>>
>
> What you describe is not as easy as enabling any other repository
How is it not as easy?
fedora-release*rpm
contains re
Hello,
I don't have the time to maintain calibre any more so I'm orphaning it.
I fell behind on bugzilla, too.
Beware, it requires a lot of love. Upstream moves very fast. Releases
happen weekly and there are always new features and sometimes new
bundled libs (yeah...).
Whoever picks this up
On 05/10/2010 04:48 PM, Frank Murphy wrote
> Hi Rahul,
> Check my reply from 11:04
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-May/135944.html
> Should work for F13+
> even for new users.
>
What you describe is not as easy as enabling any other repository and
there is no reason it sho
Dne 10.5.2010 12:48, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> That's the wrong argument. We all know why we _can't_ make it just work,
> but that doesn't excuse us. Sorry to take a well-worn analogy, but if
> two guys are trying to sell you cars, and one doesn't have an engine,
> would the fact that the guy se
On 10/05/10 12:10, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snip--
>> All it takes is adding method to wiki.
>> "How to use DVD\CD as repo
>>
>
> Frank,
>
> We are trying to make the process easier by making it a click through
> process.
It doesn't help if you insist that it can be done manually.
> Everyone
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 16:25 +0530, P J P wrote:
>
> Updated nss-softokn-3.12.4-15.fc12.i686
> Update 3.12.4-17.fc12.i686
> Updated nss-softokn-devel-3.12.4-15.fc12.i686
> Update 3.12.4-17.fc12.i686
> Updated nss-softokn-f
On 05/10/2010 02:46 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Look earlier in the thread,
> how to mount a DVD as a repo has been demonstrated.
>
> All it takes is adding method to wiki.
> "How to use DVD\CD as repo
>
Frank,
We are trying to make the process easier by making it a click through
process. It do
Hi,
After I did yum update today morning(May 10'Th), I'm facing a weird login
problem. None of the authentications - gdm login, su - user, or ssh from a
remote host etc. are being resolved.
Even passwd(1) segfaluts while changing password.
I just can't login to the machine, in any way.
did
On 05/10/2010 12:38 PM, Jos Vos wrote:
> What is the status of support for the Realtek 8192se WiFi
> controller in F12 and F13?
staging drivers are out of Fedora kernel, only crystalhd is
included.
see http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/rtl819x
--
«Allá muevan feroz guerra, ciegos reyes
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 2010 02:09:45 -0400, Orcan wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
>> >
>> > As I mentoned below, some packges need update to the
>> > lastest release badly to get rid of gtk+ 1.2. And some packages can s
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:33 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 10.5.2010 11:26, drago01 napsal(a):
> > To have stuff just work.
>
> Go to http://senate.gov/ and ask your congressman to fix it. Otherwise
> (for example if you don't have your congressman because you are not a
> U.S. citizen), you can
On So, 2010-05-09 at 11:45 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
[...]
> 1) Why chrony? Why not OpenNTPD [fill in the blank here]
Dunno if this is important for this discussion but the portable version
of OpenNTPD is stuck. The last portable version was made available in
May 2006 while the OpenBSD ve
Hi,
What is the status of support for the Realtek 8192se WiFi
controller in F12 and F13?
I see in some wiki page a reference to the Realtek website,
at least for (stock) F12.
Is this chipset in the meantime supported in the F12 kernel
and/or will it be supported in F13?
Thanks,
--
--Jos Vo
On Mon, 10 May 2010 02:09:45 -0400, Orcan wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
> >
> > As I mentoned below, some packges need update to the
> > lastest release badly to get rid of gtk+ 1.2. And some packages can safely
> > retire from fedora, e.g. xmms.
> >
>
> At that point
On 10/05/10 10:54, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 05/10/2010 10:16 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
--snip--
>>
>> Look earlier in the thread,
>> how to mount a DVD as a repo has been demonstrated.
>
> Yes, it has. And it's more difficult that installing from the repos.
> Which was my point.
>
> Andrew.
But t
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 11:45:49AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > With the latest improvements in the chrony package related to
> > NetworkManager and name resolving I think it is now good enough to
> > replace ntpd in the default c
On 05/10/2010 10:16 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 10/05/10 10:08, Andrew Haley wrote:
> --snip--
>>
>> This is a bad argument IMO. Many users are advanced in some areas,
>> but not others. The whole idea that "Fedora is a distro for advanced
>> users therefore it should be hard to use" is absurd.
Dne 10.5.2010 11:35, drago01 napsal(a):
> I didn't say that we can fix it; just that it *is* easier in other
> distributions.
Which don't have principal headquarters of their sponsor in US (but on
the Isle of Man, which was chosen exactly because of its lax legal and
especially tax, true, regime
On 05/10/2010 11:18 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 10.5.2010 06:54, Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
>> Have you ever talked to Ubuntu/openSUSE users and listened to their
>> replies when telling them you are using Fedora?
>>
>> You will hear answers along the line of too much inconvenience to get
>> multime
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 10.5.2010 11:26, drago01 napsal(a):
>> To have stuff just work.
>
> Go to http://senate.gov/ and ask your congressman to fix it. Otherwise
> (for example if you don't have your congressman because you are not a
> U.S. citizen), you can also
Dne 10.5.2010 11:26, drago01 napsal(a):
> To have stuff just work.
Go to http://senate.gov/ and ask your congressman to fix it. Otherwise
(for example if you don't have your congressman because you are not a
U.S. citizen), you can also try to move Red Hat's headquarters outside
of U.S. (althoug
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 10.5.2010 06:54, Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
>> Have you ever talked to Ubuntu/openSUSE users and listened to their
>> replies when telling them you are using Fedora?
>>
>> You will hear answers along the line of too much inconvenience to get
Dne 10.5.2010 06:54, Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
> Have you ever talked to Ubuntu/openSUSE users and listened to their
> replies when telling them you are using Fedora?
>
> You will hear answers along the line of too much inconvenience to get
> multimedia working, too unstable (in the sense of low MT
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
