On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 14:25 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
snip
* Gstreamer plugins - Is it separate? Is anyone looking into that?
They're currently separate branches of the usual -base, -good, and -bad
GStreamer plugins. They will be merged in the near future, and will
probably land in
Bastien Nocera (bnoc...@redhat.com) said:
Any grand plans? Should we put up a feature page?
I'd expect most of the support to end up in F13 updates, so I'm not sure
a feature page really makes sense.
Well, it's probably useful to list it simply from a PR/marketing
standpoint.
Does
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 10:03 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Bastien Nocera (bnoc...@redhat.com) said:
Any grand plans? Should we put up a feature page?
I'd expect most of the support to end up in F13 updates, so I'm not sure
a feature page really makes sense.
Well, it's probably
On 05/20/2010 03:19 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Expect a patent fight before the end of this.
Excerpt from http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=377
Addendum C: Summary for the lazy
... [a lot left out]
With regard to patents, VP8 copies way too much from H.264 for anyone
sane to be comfortable with
On 05/20/2010 08:38 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
On 05/20/2010 03:19 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Expect a patent fight before the end of this.
Excerpt from http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=377
Addendum C: Summary for the lazy
... [a lot left out]
With regard to patents, VP8
On Thu, 20 May 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/20/2010 08:38 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
On 05/20/2010 03:19 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Expect a patent fight before the end of this.
Excerpt from http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=377
Addendum C: Summary for the lazy
... [a lot left
On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:10:39 -0800
Jeff Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net
wrote:
Well, no, not if there's an easy way to find the existing stuff. Is
there a way to extract this info from Bugzilla? I'd stick that
query in my
On 05/11/2010 10:03 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 11.05.2010, 17:47 +0800 schrieb Chen Lei:
2010/5/11 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 14:25 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I'd expect most of the support to end up in F13 updates, so I'm not
sure
a feature page really makes sense.
This happens with a lot of our features anyway, but it does make a nice
talking point and media splash to announce Fedora 14 is
On 05/17/2010 06:49 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
What is the recommended method? Two of the packages - deja-dup and
simple-scan are mine and I have gotten a bug report to drop the Yelp
dependency on deja-dup.
Rahul
I think it's the same case as man page, packages which
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: pls upgrade mldonkey
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594454
Summary: pls upgrade mldonkey
Product: Fedora
Version: 12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594454
--- Comment #1 from Evert epm.augusti...@gmail.com 2010-05-20 13:49:07 EDT ---
appologies
this is a duplicate upgrade
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594454
Evert epm.augusti...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 10:03 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Bastien Nocera (bnoc...@redhat.com) said:
Any grand plans? Should we put up a feature page?
I'd expect most of the support to end up in F13 updates, so I'm not sure
a feature page really makes sense.
Well, it's probably
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-POE-Component-IRC/F-13
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv26184
Modified Files:
perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec
Added Files:
0001-apply-fixes-for-rhbz-591215.patch
Log Message:
* Thu May 20 2010 Iain Arnell
On 05/20/2010 11:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I believe this kind of situation is why marketing has the 'talking
points' concept.
... which is derived from the feature list.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-POE-Component-IRC/F-12
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv26672
Modified Files:
perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec
Added Files:
0001-apply-fixes-for-rhbz-591215.patch
Log Message:
* Thu May 20 2010 Iain Arnell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591216
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591215
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-POE-Component-IRC: arbitrary IRC command execution due to
insufficient stripping of CR/LF [fedora 11]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594464
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 23:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/20/2010 11:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I believe this kind of situation is why marketing has the 'talking
points' concept.
... which is derived from the feature list.
Yup. Derived from. The point is that it's *not* the same,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591216
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 23:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/20/2010 11:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I believe this kind of situation is why marketing has the 'talking
points' concept.
... which is derived from the feature
2010/5/20 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) ngomp...@gmail.com:
It's too bad that we can't say that Fedora 13 has all these cool things.
Fedora would get some considerable notoriety for being the first to fully
support it. Then again, we cannot fully support it for HTML5 since Firefox
doesn't have it...
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Not all of the packages that use Yelp actually depend on it and the
current package list seems completely arbitrary.
The reason dependencies on yelp are considered harmful is that they were
dragging yelp, and with it the entire xulrunner stack, onto non-GNOME spins
On 05/21/2010 03:34 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
People are asking you to drop the dependency for a reason. Please do it.
Let's fight dependency bloat!
Blindly dropping dependencies and breaking the help menu items is not a
way to fight so called dependency bloat. Anyway as you are already
Matěj Cepl wrote:
Which don't have principal headquarters of their sponsor in US (but on
the Isle of Man, which was chosen exactly because of its lax legal and
especially tax, true, regime). Instead of comparing with Ubuntu, how is
our configuration more complicated than OpenSuSE, which is in
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
This is also wrong because we want 0%{?rhel} = 5.
To avoid having to specify negation I'd also reverse the condition:
%if 0%{?rhel} = 5 || 0%{?fedora}
BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers-devel
%else
BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers
%endif
I'd spell the condition as:
%if
Adam Williamson wrote:
To answer the question someone posed earlier in the thread, when I was
doing a lot of testing of various F13 RC2 installs yesterday, none of
them - not the default desktop install from DVD, the desktop spin, the
KDE spin or the Xfce spin - had more than 12 updates
Till Maas wrote:
A current problem I see with using upstream release monitoring is that
there is no easy way to query which bugs are ignored, because it is
perfectly valid to not touch the bug as a maintainer but only update the
package. This will avoid a new bug to be filed, but the
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 01:34 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
A solution, flags!
Well, we should carefully consider the disadvantages of that change. For
example, one thing we will lose with a flag-based solution is the
transitiveness of blocking a tracker bug. So we'd lose
Rakesh Pandit wrote:
No change in normal process. Just 2-3 days extra between this
particular case in which a nack (-ve karma) is received between
maintainer requesting a push for stable and rel-eng submitting it. It
will prevent `race condition` where say maintainer wants to pull it
back but
Michael Schwendt wrote:
The longer it takes to push packages into a repo, the longer the window
that creates the race condition. It could be that the push has completed
98% of the stuff that needs to be done, and a tester would vote -1 late
because of a show-stopper bug in one package.
If
Bastien Nocera wrote:
Just stick by it. The next version of yelp will use webkit.
But webkitgtk is still an extraneous dependency of significant size on the
KDE spin.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
skvidal and I are working on a builder for third party add on repositories
for Fedora. That builder would be separate from koji and would, indeed
use a vm for building.
Yet another one? We already have Plague and Koji, what would the new one
offer over those? Would it
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
I think because macroses should be included before it processed as shell
script.
Is there some variant of %include or similar?
AFAIK, no. E.g. in kde-filesystem, we end up defining things twice, once for
the specfile itself and once for the .macros
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 11:10 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
I sure hope this is solved somewhat intelligently and does not compile
each and every schema on every installed package. Whatever it is that
gconf is doing on updates/installs now is bad enough.
Yes, it does
2010/5/21 Patrice Dumas pertu...@free.fr
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:56:07PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Any other recommendations? Otherwise I am dropping yelp dependencies in
rawhide.
I added a dependency on yelp in gnochm because I thought that having a
click on the help button
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 03:29 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 11:10 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
I sure hope this is solved somewhat intelligently and does not compile
each and every schema on every installed package. Whatever it is that
gconf is
Kevin Kofler píše v Pá 21. 05. 2010 v 03:29 +0200:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 11:10 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
Why can the package not come with it's schema precompiled?
Because they all go into a single binary file.
Yuck! Hello, registry! :-/
What's next?
Rawhide Report wrote:
mumble-1.2.2-8.fc14
---
* Sun May 16 2010 Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name - 1.2.2-8
- Rebuild for protobuf ABI change
- Added redhat-lsb to the Requires for murmur
As already noted by Rahul Sundaram when this change was made in CVS, redhat-
lsb is NOT
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591216
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-20
14:38:02 EDT ---
42 matches
Mail list logo
