On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 05:42:38PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 05:25:00PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
Hi Everyone,
If you are receiving this email then you are listed as the owner of a
mailing list hosted by the fedora
On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:41:14 -0500, Matt_Domsch wrote:
It has nothing to do with disk space. Sitting on a few hundred thousand spam
messages for no reason, that'll get ignored forever, and that slow mailman
down, serves no purpose.
If moderators want to actually moderate their lists for
On 20.05.2010 18:42, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 14:25 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I'd expect most of the support to end up in F13 updates, so I'm not
sure a feature page really makes sense.
This happens with a lot of our features anyway, [...]
And that imho is quite bad for
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
early in the F13 cycle, we enabled the bytecode interpreter in our
freetype package, since the patents on that have expired last fall.
Unfortunately, it turned out that many free fonts don't actually benefit
from this,
Hi,
Google released a set of high quality fonts as open source and I'm
wondering of those can be packaged and included for/in the next Fedora
14. Would that be possible?
http://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/
-Ilyes Gouta
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
On 05/17/2010 03:13 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
2010/5/16 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) fo...@hubbitus.com.ru
mailto:fo...@hubbitus.com.ru
About ABI breakage there separate problem in ImageMagick -
http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org/msg736218.html
Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Google released a set of high quality fonts as open source and I'm
wondering of those can be packaged and included for/in the next Fedora
14. Would that be possible?
http://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/
You should look at
Compose started at Sat May 22 08:15:37 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
SolarModel-2.1-7.fc14.i686 requires libIrrlicht.so.1.6
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686
On 22.05.2010 11:59, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 10:14 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 20.05.2010 18:42, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 14:25 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I'd expect most of the support to end up in F13 updates, so I'm not
sure a feature page
2010/5/22 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Hi,
On 05/17/2010 03:13 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --alldeps ImageMagick-c++
ImageMagick-c++-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.i686
ImageMagick-c++-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.x86_64
inkscape-0:0.48-0.2.20100505bzr.fc14.x86_64
2010/5/22 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se
fre 2010-05-21 klockan 19:55 -0500 skrev Matt Domsch:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 08:40:12AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 07:44:48AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rawhide Report wrote:
mumble-1.2.2-8.fc14
Chen Lei wrote:
I'd rather like to suggest of forbidden using of initscript in redhat-lsb
for fedora packages. Despite of the depencencies issue, we can easily
switch from /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions to /lib/lsb/init-functions and
historically /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd and
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
So the problem is not length of time, but number of messages in a
directory. Why is the limit not set on number of messages, rather
than time? Is there one directory for the whole of the Fedora mail
system, or one directory per mailing list? Can individual mailing
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Unfortunately I couldn't find a really good way to differentiate
between Debian from Ubuntu without using 'lsb_release -i'.
/etc/issue contains that information. It says something like:
Ubuntu 9.04 \n \l
(blank line)
By the way, that also works on Fedora, my
Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Google released a set of high quality fonts as open source and I'm
wondering of those can be packaged and included for/in the next Fedora
14. Would that be possible?
http://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/
Not all of those fonts were actually released by Google,
Is it worth using tmpfs for some directories(/var/run, lock...) ?
This is ubuntu /proc/mounts:
rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
none /sys sysfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
none /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
none /dev devtmpfs rw,relatime,size=4092312k,nr_inodes=1023078,mode=755 0
On 05/23/2010 02:36 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
(And as a side note: systemd by default puts a tmpfs to both /var/run
and /var/lock).
So do you plan on getting it by default for Fedora 14? :-)
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 05/23/2010 03:04 AM, Uwe Kubosch wrote:
Hi all!
I am having trouble building zfs-fuse for F-13 and devel:
/usr/bin/ld: lib/libzfs/libzfs.a(libzfs_sendrecv.o): undefined reference to
symbol 'SHA256_Init'
/usr/bin/ld: note: 'SHA256_Init' is defined in DSO /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.10
On 19 May 2010 18:01, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello all, I just sent an email to several of you with the F12-F13
updates list. I included f13-updates-testing but forgot f13-updates so
some of those in the list were false positives. Below is an updated
list. Sorry about
On Sun, 23.05.10 02:40, Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 05/23/2010 02:36 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
(And as a side note: systemd by default puts a tmpfs to both /var/run
and /var/lock).
So do you plan on getting it by default for Fedora 14? :-)
Well, I am
On Sat, 22.05.10 22:11, Ilyes Gouta (ilyes.go...@gmail.com) wrote:
I'd love to play with it. Is systemd stable enough to try it on Fedora 13?
Well, I guess you should really know what you do if you try that.
That said, if you steal the libcgroup and udev version from rawhide
(which is
Hey Lennart,
So how fast is a systemd boot (with all the changes to the scripts)
compared to the current F13 setup? How about a ratio?
-Ilyes Gouta
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/23/2010 04:04 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
ATM everything
Never mind. Missing #include sys/stat.h
On May 23, 2010, at 12:58 AM, Uwe Kubosch wrote:
Thank you for your reply. I was able to fix the immediate error by linking
with libcrypto as suggested.
Now I get
gcc -o cmd/zdb/zdb -pipe -Wall -s cmd/zdb/zdb.o cmd/zdb/zdb_il.o
On Sun, 23.05.10 00:04, Ilyes Gouta (ilyes.go...@gmail.com) wrote:
Heya,
So how fast is a systemd boot (with all the changes to the scripts)
compared to the current F13 setup? How about a ratio?
Please be patient. To quote myself: I'll publish the numbers of a 100%
socket-activated boot soon.
24 matches
Mail list logo
