On 25 May 2010 20:22, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
Long-term, it would be nice for this to integrate with PackageKit
somehow. Short-term, the simplest solution would seem to be to provide a
stub package that provides: yelp and a yelp binary, and then have that
binary do nothing
CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS LDFLAGS=-lm waf configure --prefix=%{_prefix}
-
waf configure --prefix=%{_prefix} --no-runtime-deps
All python modules are not needed in runtime, don't check them. Also,
the package is noarch, optflags is not needed.
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
2010/5/26 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com:
CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS LDFLAGS=-lm waf configure --prefix=%{_prefix}
-
waf configure --prefix=%{_prefix} --no-runtime-deps
All python modules are not needed in runtime, don't check them. Also,
the package is noarch, optflags is not needed.
Chen
Hi,
A merge is the most appropriate here. After all libjpeg-turbo just
offers a set of x86 specific SSE/MMX routines such as IDCT (maybe
huffman, but I didn't check that) that would be easily plugged into
ijg, but doesn't change the foundations (architecture and exposed
public API) of libjpeg.
On 26/05/10 04:02, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:45:07PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 25.05.10 10:21, Casey Dahlin (cdah...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:05:31AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 05/23/2010 04:19 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Lennart
James Findley wrote:
Modern systems just don't take very long to spawn awk. Or sed. Or cut.
Or bash. IMO this sort of tradeoff between speed and ease of use hasn't
been appropriate in 20 years.
It's really not at all uncommon for me to need to modify an init script.
There would be much
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Net-Patricia-1.17_03 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596103
Summary: perl-Net-Patricia-1.17_03 is available
Product:
On 26/05/10 11:12, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:01 +0100, James Findley wrote:
On 26/05/10 04:02, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:45:07PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 25.05.10 10:21, Casey Dahlin (cdah...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010
Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl writes:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:58:29AM +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
...
nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.6-1.2.fc11.x86_64
my version is currently at:
nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.4-19.fc12.i686
on a fully updated F13 box.
That's look like a problem betwee F11
Hi,
I ran a couple of preupgrades to go from F12 to F13 last night and it
all went very smoothly. I have only one slight criticism and that is
that the final stage of the upgrade takes a subjectively long time,
during which the progress indication is a frantic bouncing progress
bar. What is
On Tue, 25.05.10 23:02, Casey Dahlin (cdah...@redhat.com) wrote:
Why do you say cgroups are a dead end? Sure, Scott claims that, but
uh, it's not the only place where he is simply wrong and his claims
baseless. In fact it works really well, and is one of the strong points
in systemd. I
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 01:04:31PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl writes:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:58:29AM +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
...
nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.6-1.2.fc11.x86_64
my version is currently at:
nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.4-19.fc12.i686
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 17:24 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Can you point us to where any background discussion has taken place
with Upstart folks?
No, I cannot. Kay and I and a couple of others sat down at various LPC
and GUADEC and discussed what we would like to see in an init
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com wrote:
CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS LDFLAGS=-lm waf configure --prefix=%{_prefix}
-
waf configure --prefix=%{_prefix} --no-runtime-deps
All python modules are not needed in runtime, don't check them. Also,
the package is noarch,
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 01:26:48PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
The problem we've found is that cgroups are too aggressive. They don't have
a
notion of sessions and count too much as being part of your service, so you
end
up with your screen session being counted as part of gdm.
On Wed, 26 May 2010 12:42:13 +0200
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Casey Dahlin cdah...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:45:07PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 25.05.10 10:21, Casey Dahlin (cdah...@redhat.com) wrote:
[...]
3)
Compose started at Wed May 26 08:15:13 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.3-1.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12
1:anerley-0.1.8-4.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12
anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 12:35 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
We did sit down and discuss things, and you convinced me that
launchd-style activation was a useful thing to have. Then you went off
and wrote systemd anyway.
If you want to add socket passing to upstart as well, we can turn
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
While you don't edit them *all* the time, it is something that is done
regularly, and it is something most admins can do with ease.
Turn them in a C program and you left admins out in the cold, most of
them.
I would be very, very wary of accepting a
* Ola Thoresen [26/05/2010 14:39] :
Would it not be more fruitful to discuss _why_ you (we?) need to edit
the initscripts? Describe what functionality is missing or wrong in the
default ones?
Editing environnement variables and indicating which specific interfaces
I want the daemon to
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Klaus Grue wrote:
Hi,
I just upgraded to F13. It's nice. But look at this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PreUpgrade says
Common post-upgrade tasks ...
Some packages may no longer be supported by the new release ...
These can be identified with the following
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 08:54:23AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
While you don't edit them *all* the time, it is something that is done
regularly, and it is something most admins can do with ease.
Turn them in a C program and you left admins out in
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:58:29AM +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
...
nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.6-1.2.fc11.x86_64
my version is currently at:
nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.4-19.fc12.i686
on a fully updated F13 box.
That's look like a problem betwee F11 and
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Chuck Anderson wrote:
-21 million.
Scripts are a crutch to avoid properly designed daemons and
configuration systems. I never edit initscripts to configure
daemons, because they would just be overwritten at the next package
upgrade. Configuration should be separate
On Wed, 26 May 2010 09:08:09 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Chuck Anderson wrote:
-21 million.
Scripts are a crutch to avoid properly designed daemons and
configuration systems. I never edit initscripts to configure
daemons,
I got a BZ for a package I maintain from someone who needs multilib
support without using Mock:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595923
I found myself asking what the requirements are for a -devel package. In
general, do we support this in -devel libs or not? On IRC, I think I've
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:01:35PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 01:26:48PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
The problem we've found is that cgroups are too aggressive. They don't
have a
notion of sessions and count too much as being part of your service, so
you
On 26/05/10 14:24, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010 09:08:09 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidalskvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Chuck Anderson wrote:
-21 million.
Scripts are a crutch to avoid properly designed daemons and
configuration systems. I never edit initscripts
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 08:54:23AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
While you don't edit them *all* the time, it is something that is done
regularly, and it is something most admins can do
On Wed, 26.05.10 14:01, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 01:26:48PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
The problem we've found is that cgroups are too aggressive. They don't
have a
notion of sessions and count too much as being part of your service, so
Seth Vidal wrote:
+20 million.
I couldn't agree more. They need to be scripts, considering how seldom
they actually run it makes even less sense to chase down optimization in
them by making them compiled.
Absolutely. I have no idea why you shouldn't use a small and light
interpreted
Once upon a time, drago01 drag...@gmail.com said:
This does make a lot of sense to me, initscripts being scripts is a
major slowdown factor
by itself.
But they aren't a major slowdown factor (see the example numbers in this
thread).
And, if they were, any init scripts that are a problem could
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 08:54 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
While you don't edit them *all* the time, it is something that is done
regularly, and it is something most admins can do with ease.
Turn them in a C program and you left admins out in the cold,
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 08:54 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
While you don't edit them *all* the time, it is something that is done
regularly, and it is something most admins can do with ease.
Turn them in a C
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Jeremy Sanders
jer...@jeremysanders.net wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
+20 million.
I couldn't agree more. They need to be scripts, considering how seldom
they actually run it makes even less sense to chase down optimization in
them by making them compiled.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Once upon a time, drago01 drag...@gmail.com said:
This does make a lot of sense to me, initscripts being scripts is a
major slowdown factor
by itself.
But they aren't a major slowdown factor (see the example numbers in
Once upon a time, drago01 drag...@gmail.com said:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Once upon a time, drago01 drag...@gmail.com said:
This does make a lot of sense to me, initscripts being scripts is a
major slowdown factor
by itself.
But they
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 09:51:53PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
The patents for the former expired but apparently some fonts look
worse with it so we decided to disable it.
(I have been running with it enabled for years and for me stuff does
look _way_ better with the bci ... but well this is a
On 26/05/10 15:20, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 08:54 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
While you don't edit them *all* the time, it is something that is done
regularly, and it is something most admins can do with ease.
Turn them in a C program
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 08:43 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 12:35 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
We did sit down and discuss things, and you convinced me that
launchd-style activation was a useful thing to have. Then you went off
and wrote systemd anyway.
If
2010/5/26 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com:
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 14:26 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
llvm-2.7-2.fc14
---
* Mon May 24 2010 Michel Salim sali...@fedoraproject.org - 2.7-2
- Exclude llm-gcc manpages
- Turn on apidoc generation
- Build with srcdir=objdir, otherwise
Adam Williamson wrote:
I beg to differ. I've had to create or modify initscripts quite often,
either as a sysadmin or a packager. If this is now going to require C
coding skills, I'm not going to be able to do it. I don't think it's
safe to assume that everyone who needs to write or modify an
On Wed, 26.05.10 10:01, James Findley (s...@gmx.com) wrote:
3) Cutting down on the forking by replacing some of the shell scripts...
cool
3a) With C code... really?
Yeah. I think this is odd too.
The blog complains about how many awk spawns there are - but this looks
like a
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 12:42 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Casey Dahlin cdah...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:45:07PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 25.05.10 10:21,
On Wed, 26.05.10 12:27, seth vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
Right, would be good if you could elaborate about that. I alead asked
you a couple of times about this. Would love to hear about the
reasoning.
Scott, Lennart,
A Proposal: maybe the two of you should continue this
I've made some benchmarks starting a dummy service (do not call any programs
or kill) and a samba server on my notebook. I run those tests 4 times and
discarded the first one. Each test execute 100 times the command:
service dummy restart = 0,023ms
service smb restart = 0,158ms
c application =
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 06:39:43PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
Again the sysadmin case just implies that something *else* is broken.
Sure. As a distribution, we don't have control over upstream projects and
their assumptions for daemon startup, shutdown, status, etc. Sometimes, they
want odd things.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
http://0pointer.de/public/dbus.service.
Note the ExecStartPre here, like most daemons, is conceptually busted.
There's no reason we shouldn't lay that file down once when the OS is
installed, and not check it
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/5/26 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com:
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 14:26 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
llvm-2.7-2.fc14
---
* Mon May 24 2010 Michel Salim sali...@fedoraproject.org - 2.7-2
- Exclude llm-gcc
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
Well, that depends on configuration.
In systemd you can choose individually for each unit whether you want to
allow it to continue run processes on shut down, whether you want the
main process killed, the process
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 18:14 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Oh come on. Thanks for turning this into something personal.
You did that last week - I got forwarded logs from #systemd. That's
probably why I wasn't in a great mood with you this morning ;-)
I'd prefer it we would keep this
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Wed, 26.05.10 09:07, Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 12:42 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Casey Dahlin cdah...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25,
On 05/26/2010 12:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
It is not like you want to edit the scripts all the time, so there is
no reason for them being scripts.
I beg to differ. I've had to create or modify initscripts quite often,
either as a sysadmin or a packager. If this is now going to require C
ons 2010-05-26 klockan 10:01 +0100 skrev James Findley:
It's really not at all uncommon for me to need to modify an init script.
There would be much rage if in order to do this I had to download the
SRPM, extract the init code, figure out what I needed to change, modify
it, recompile
Le dimanche 23 mai 2010 à 00:34 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
ATM everything looks rosy. I just finished porting over all F13
installed-by-default daemons to socket activation, and a few more (and
the patches are good enough to be upstreamable).
For this kind of stuff I strongly
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:29 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 09:51:53PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
The patents for the former expired but apparently some fonts look
worse with it so we decided to disable it.
(I have been running with it enabled for years and for me stuff
Le mercredi 26 mai 2010 à 19:39 +0200, Alexander Boström a écrit :
ons 2010-05-26 klockan 10:01 +0100 skrev James Findley:
It's really not at all uncommon for me to need to modify an init script.
There would be much rage if in order to do this I had to download the
SRPM, extract the
+1
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Martin Sourada
martin.sour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:29 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 09:51:53PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
The patents for the former expired but apparently some fonts look
worse with it so we decided
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 08:54 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
While you don't edit them *all* the time, it is something that is done
regularly, and it is something most admins can do with ease.
Turn them in a C program and you left admins out in the cold,
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:30:56PM +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
Depends on the criteria you use. The with bytecode version has better
kerning, better shapes, better flow, but is blurry (yeah, without
Not just blurry, though -- awkwardly blurry. At screen resolution, in fact,
I think it's
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 14:08 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 08:54 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
While you don't edit them *all* the time, it is something that is done
regularly, and it is something most admins can do with ease.
Hi all,
On 05/22/2010 05:55 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
hi there,
Can it be updated to upstream version in rawhide ?
The libjpeg version(6b) in Fedora is quite old(27-Mar-1998).
And newer versions were released on:
Version 7 27-Jun-2009
Version 8 10-Jan-2010
Version 8a
On Wed, 26 May 2010 18:20:08 +0200
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
Regarding the LISTEN_PID env var:
environment variables are normally inherited when forking/execing. We
want to make sure that only the process we actually start ourselves
parses and handles LISTEN_FDS. We
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 18:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I beg to differ. I've had to create or modify initscripts quite often,
either as a sysadmin or a packager. If this is now going to require C
coding skills, I'm not going to be able to do it. I don't think it's
safe to assume
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 11:32 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
OTOH, why is this even a sub-topic in this sub-topic of a thread? I'd
love to see some numbers from the complainers about scripting being
slow. I have a normal Fedora 13 x86_64 system that boots through
initscripts in under 10
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Mamoru Tasaka
mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp wrote:
Ratnadeep Debnath wrote, at 05/26/2010 08:46 PM +9:00:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Chen Leisupercyp...@gmail.com wrote:
CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS LDFLAGS=-lm waf configure --prefix=%{_prefix}
-
waf
Lennart Poettering wrote:
Regarding the LISTEN_PID env var:
environment variables are normally inherited when forking/execing. We
want to make sure that only the process we actually start ourselves
parses and handles LISTEN_FDS. We want to avoid that if this daemon
might spawn some other
James Findley wrote:
You're comparing the wrong thing here - I was demonstrating that it
doesn't take noticeably longer to spawn awk than a small C app on modern
systems.
thus using:
for i in {1..1000}; do awk 'BEGIN{print Hello World}' /dev/null; done
for i in {1..1000}; do ./helloworld
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sssd-1.2.0-12.fc13
Appears to be in limbo.
Status: pending
sgallagh - 2010-05-07 21:51:09
This update has been submitted for testing.
bodhi - 2010-05-08 16:09:51
This update has been pushed to testing
sgallagh - 2010-05-18 18:34:06
This update
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 15:03 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sssd-1.2.0-12.fc13
Appears to be in limbo.
Status: pending
sgallagh - 2010-05-07 21:51:09
This update has been submitted for testing.
bodhi - 2010-05-08 16:09:51
This update has
Jonathan Robie wrote:
I got a BZ for a package I maintain from someone who needs multilib
support without using Mock:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595923
Please send a new message instead of replying to an unrelated one. It
matters for mail clients which support proper
Jeremy Sanders (jer...@jeremysanders.net) said:
Something like Lua would be very good. The overheads over C would be
minimal, and it would have the advantage of being editable.
I've had to edit an init script to get something working properly many
times.
If you're going to want them to
seth vidal wrote:
It appears this subject has been picked up on lwn - so I'm certain there
will be a fruitful, productive and constructive discussion there.
Hahaha! You gotta be kidding! LWN keeps posting flamewars as news and
their comments are infested by trolls like no other place!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592209
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
James Findley (s...@gmx.com) said:
Actually the blog post is proposing exactly that, as I read it. And it
seems not only that lots of other people read it the same way, but some
even agree with it.
So I'm not sure I see how this is going off into the weeds - if
transitioning some/all
On 26/05/10 22:03, Orion Poplawski wrote:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sssd-1.2.0-12.fc13
Appears to be in limbo.
Needs cuddles and kisses.
If you are using it leave a comment.
If not:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=174916
Frank
--
devel mailing list
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 23:39 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
seth vidal wrote:
It appears this subject has been picked up on lwn - so I'm certain there
will be a fruitful, productive and constructive discussion there.
Hahaha! You gotta be kidding! LWN keeps posting flamewars as news and
their
Rawhide Report wrote:
gcc-4.4.4-5.fc14
* Tue May 25 2010 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com 4.4.4-5
- update from gcc-4_4-branch
Can we get 4.5 for F14?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Rawhide Report wrote:
In order to keep the WenQuanYi Zen Hei as default Simplified Chinese font,
the fontconfig file of this WenQuanYi Micro Hei font is removed.
I think this is wrong. It'll break if somebody only has Micro Hei installed,
for space reasons (e.g. the F13 KDE spin ships
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 23:39 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
seth vidal wrote:
It appears this subject has been picked up on lwn - so I'm certain there
will be a fruitful, productive and constructive discussion there.
Hahaha! You gotta be kidding! LWN keeps posting flamewars as news and
their
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 23:39:49 +0200,
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
seth vidal wrote:
It appears this subject has been picked up on lwn - so I'm certain there
will be a fruitful, productive and constructive discussion there.
Hahaha! You gotta be kidding! LWN keeps posting
There has been some instability in rawhide pkg-config in the last few
days. The reason is that I've built the long-overdue 0.24, which turned
out to have a few small issues.
One remaining problem that is still causing some build problems is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596433
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Luming Yu luming...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 26 May 2010 08:16, Luming Yu wrote:
Hi there,
I happen to see a banshee-1 hang after it was accidentally left
repeatedly playing two
hey,
I recently packaged nautilus-pastebin. I tested it successfully, so did
Rahul [1]
A few days ago, it stopped functioning. That is, a right click no longer
shows a send to pastebin option. I'm sure this isn't an error in the
nautilus-pastebin package since it's the same package that
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-BerkeleyDB/F-13
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv17430/F-13
Modified Files:
perl-BerkeleyDB.spec
Log Message:
* Tue May 25 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
- Rebuild for Berkeley DB 4.8.30 in F-13 and Rawhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595831
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592209
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595834
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
88 matches
Mail list logo
