rawhide report: 20100613 changes

2010-06-13 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun Jun 13 08:15:04 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9 cpanspec-1.78-5.fc14.noarch requires perl(IO::Uncompress::Bunzip2)

Re: Hey Presto!

2010-06-13 Thread Christopher Brown
On 12 June 2010 16:48, Jonathan Dieter jdie...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 16:35 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 05:27:32PM +0200, drago01 wrote: We don't generate deltas for packages with a size of = 100MB which kind of makes it useless for this case

Re: dist-git project update

2010-06-13 Thread Christopher Brown
Hi Jesse, On 11 June 2010 22:57, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: Is it necessary to do fedpkg clone ? Or can regular git be used ? Not necessary at all.  The current url is pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/package  and that works

Re: dist-git project update

2010-06-13 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jesse Keating wrote: I hope you are all as excited as I am about this! Count me as not excited. As I already pointed out several times, I don't see anything obviously wrong with our CVS setup, so I don't see what we have to gain from switching to one of the hardest to use SCM systems out

Re: dist-git project update

2010-06-13 Thread Rakesh Pandit
On 13 June 2010 22:24, Kevin Kofler wrote: Jesse Keating wrote: I hope you are all as excited as I am about this! Count me as not excited. As I already pointed out several times, I don't see anything obviously wrong with our CVS setup, so I don't see what we have to gain from switching to

Re: dist-git project update

2010-06-13 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:05:38AM +0530, Rakesh Pandit wrote: I second that, unless there are some obvious advantages which I cannot see. In case there are some it would be great if they get mentioned in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Dist_Git_Proposal Linked from there: Current Pain

Re: dist-git project update

2010-06-13 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:22 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote: The current url is pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/package and that works with git:// and ssh://. Any chance of making that work with http:// and https:// (for

Re: dist-git project update

2010-06-13 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sun, 2010-06-13 at 17:26 +0100, Christopher Brown wrote: Hi Jesse, On 11 June 2010 22:57, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: Is it necessary to do fedpkg clone ? Or can regular git be used ? Not necessary at all. The

rpms/perl-Font-TTF/devel perl-Font-TTF.spec,1.18,1.19

2010-06-13 Thread nim
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Font-TTF/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4546 Modified Files: perl-Font-TTF.spec Log Message: Remove BuildRoot specification, it's been ignored since rpm 4.6.0 Index: perl-Font-TTF.spec

[Bug 603502] [abrt] crash in perl-Padre-0.50-4.fc13: Process /usr/bin/perl was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

2010-06-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603502 --- Comment #1 from it_...@gmx.de 2010-06-13 11:05:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=423642) --

[Bug 603502] New: [abrt] crash in perl-Padre-0.50-4.fc13: Process /usr/bin/perl was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

2010-06-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [abrt] crash in perl-Padre-0.50-4.fc13: Process /usr/bin/perl was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603502 Summary: